Re: check_whitelist

2008-10-08 Thread Chris
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 12:49 pm, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hi, > > The check_whitelist tool is apparently gone, > - can we use this tool from older releases with 3.2.5? > --per It works fine here. -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C pgpZVyhELmmep.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [OT?] rDNS tomfoolery - "localhost"

2008-10-08 Thread mouss
John Hardin a écrit : > On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, mouss wrote: > >> John Hardin a écrit : >> >>> I've recently come across some anomalous behavior in Vista and Win2k3 >>> when confronted with a host's rDNS returning "localhost". It seems >>> Vista and Win2k3 replace this with the local hostname. To illus

Re: [OT?] rDNS tomfoolery - "localhost"

2008-10-08 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, mouss wrote: John Hardin a écrit : I've recently come across some anomalous behavior in Vista and Win2k3 when confronted with a host's rDNS returning "localhost". It seems Vista and Win2k3 replace this with the local hostname. To illustrate: ping -a 123.30.74.2 AFAIK,

Re: [OT?] rDNS tomfoolery - "localhost"

2008-10-08 Thread mouss
John Hardin a écrit : > All: > > I've recently come across some anomalous behavior in Vista and Win2k3 > when confronted with a host's rDNS returning "localhost". It seems > Vista and Win2k3 replace this with the local hostname. To illustrate: > >ping -a 123.30.74.2 > AFAIK, "-a" doesn't change

[OT?] rDNS tomfoolery - "localhost"

2008-10-08 Thread John Hardin
All: I've recently come across some anomalous behavior in Vista and Win2k3 when confronted with a host's rDNS returning "localhost". It seems Vista and Win2k3 replace this with the local hostname. To illustrate: ping -a 123.30.74.2 (Note: this isn't new, some searching reveals a blog post

Re: check_whitelist

2008-10-08 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 07:49:41PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: The check_whitelist tool is apparently gone, - can we use this tool from older releases with 3.2.5? Not sure. Probably, unless the format changed. Is there any work to get tools/ back? It got remove

Re: check_whitelist

2008-10-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 07:49:41PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > The check_whitelist tool is apparently gone, > - can we use this tool from older releases with 3.2.5? Not sure. Probably, unless the format changed. > Is there any work to get tools/ back? It got removed from the tarball beca

check_whitelist

2008-10-08 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Hi, The check_whitelist tool is apparently gone, - can we use this tool from older releases with 3.2.5? Is there any work to get tools/ back? Thanks, --per

German for the backscatter-plagued (was: an OT thread)

2008-10-08 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:39 +0200, mouss wrote: > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Suffering from a backscatter wave, > > same here, started yesterday. Yeah, pretty much so. *sigh* > > and haven't even got sufficient > > caffeine. "Your email was quarantined due to an unauthorized Cyrillic > >

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-08 Thread mouss
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Can this off-topic thread please die already? It has been quite for days. I prefer it like that. +1 guenther Suffering from a backscatter wave, same here, started yesterday. and haven't even got sufficient caffeine. "Your email was quarantined due to an u

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-08 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
Can this off-topic thread please die already? It has been quite for days. I prefer it like that. guenther Suffering from a backscatter wave, and haven't even got sufficient caffeine. "Your email was quarantined due to an unauthorized Cyrillic Language Character Set". Yeah, right... -- char

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, October 8, 2008 02:25, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2008-10-07 11:35:31, schrieb Don Saklad: > Why wast resources for funny 2500x1900 screens? here i have 1600x1200 in a frammebuffer, why do i need to install x11 ? > Servers doing non-releated stuff are bad for our Environement, consumin

Re: Identifying headers for users@spamassassin.apache.org

2008-10-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-10-07 11:35:31, schrieb Don Saklad: > Someday, in the future when we have real computers users would have > things the way they prefer. Do you relay think, Servers would change? Why wast resources for funny 2500x1900 screens? Servers doing non-releated stuff are bad for our Environement,

spam score not counted correctly

2008-10-08 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Hi, i'm using Debian stable and spamassassin v3.2.3. Recently i noticed a few spam mails getting through although the combined scores should be high enough. The email is however flagged as not being spam, the score is set to 3.9 but should actually be way higher. I also encountered something simil

Re: DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE broken?

2008-10-08 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Sm wrote on Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:03:57 -0700: > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5672 so, if you (OP) were using sa-update you wouldn't have even noticed ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com