Re: Uribl for myself

2008-10-02 Thread Kris Deugau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, i want to start my own local uribl. Spamassassin should read a raw-textfile for example /home/spamblack.txt where some url's are in wunschurlaub.biz euromillion.de and another.. If match one of these entries, the Mail should marked with X Points. How do

Uribl for myself

2008-10-02 Thread usenet
Hello, i want to start my own local uribl. Spamassassin should read a raw-textfile for example /home/spamblack.txt where some url's are in wunschurlaub.biz euromillion.de and another.. If match one of these entries, the Mail should marked with X Points. How do i implement this? Thx S

Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

2008-10-02 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:02 PM +0100 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is just in the dev ruleset -- for 3.3.0 -- so you're best off adding it manually. right now it's like this: # thanks to Phil Randal on the users list for this tip rawbody __PR_TD_NOWRAP // m

Re: SPF rules

2008-10-02 Thread mouss
Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu, October 2, 2008 16:28, Ray Jette wrote: Good morning, evening here :) it keeps changing here :) The SPF_PASS and SPF_HELO_PASS rules hit several hundred messages a day. I am doing SPF lockup's at the MTA. How do I go about stopping these tests from within SA

Re: SPF rules

2008-10-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, October 2, 2008 16:28, Ray Jette wrote: > Good morning, evening here :) > The SPF_PASS and SPF_HELO_PASS rules hit several hundred messages a day. > I am doing SPF lockup's at the MTA. How do I go about stopping these > tests from within SA? perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf perldoc Mail

Re: problem with RDNS_NONE: false positive

2008-10-02 Thread mouss
nik600 wrote: I'm experiencing a strange problem with RDNS_NONE. On the same sender host, sometimes it is marked with RDNS_NONE, and sometimes not. The host has a reverse dns! Example: Received: from dadosoftware.com (dns2.dadosoftware.com [217.199.13.2]) -> OK Received: from dadosoftware.com

Re: SPF rules

2008-10-02 Thread Kelson
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Of course, PASS tells nothing, but there are *FAIL, NEUTRAL etc. Actually, PASS can tell you quite a bit if you're trying to whitelist a specific address or domain (eg. whitelist_from_spf). -- Kelson Vibber SpeedGate Communications

Re: SPF rules

2008-10-02 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 10:57 -0400, Ray Jette wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply. Do you know what .pre file this is contained > in? From the /etc/spamassassin directory I ran the following: > grep SPF_PASS *.pre but came up with nothing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]$ grep -i -C 1 spf *.pre ini

Re: SPF rules

2008-10-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 10:28 -0400, Ray Jette wrote: > > Good morning, > > The SPF_PASS and SPF_HELO_PASS rules hit several hundred messages a day. > > I am doing SPF lockup's at the MTA. How do I go about stopping these > > tests from within SA? On 02.10.08 09:44, McDonald, Dan wrote: > score SP

Re: SPF rules

2008-10-02 Thread Ray Jette
Thanks for the quick reply. Do you know what .pre file this is contained in? From the /etc/spamassassin directory I ran the following: grep SPF_PASS *.pre but came up with nothing. Thanks. On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 09:44 -0500, McDonald, Dan wrote: > or just remove the module from the .pre file that

Re: SPF rules

2008-10-02 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 10:28 -0400, Ray Jette wrote: > Good morning, > The SPF_PASS and SPF_HELO_PASS rules hit several hundred messages a day. > I am doing SPF lockup's at the MTA. How do I go about stopping these > tests from within SA? score SPF_PASS 0 score SPF_HELO_PASS 0 or just remove the m

Re: SPF rules

2008-10-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 02.10.08 10:28, Ray Jette wrote: > The SPF_PASS and SPF_HELO_PASS rules hit several hundred messages a day. > I am doing SPF lockup's at the MTA. How do I go about stopping these > tests from within SA? if your MTA pushes Received-SPF: headers to the mail, the SA will use it. There are still m

Re: problem with RDNS_NONE: false positive

2008-10-02 Thread Quelonius
nik600 hotmail wrote: > > I'm experiencing a strange problem with RDNS_NONE. > > On the same sender host, sometimes it is marked with RDNS_NONE, and > sometimes not. > > The host has a reverse dns! > > Example: > Received: from dadosoftware.com (dns2.dadosoftware.com [217.199.13.2]) -> > OK >

SPF rules

2008-10-02 Thread Ray Jette
Good morning, The SPF_PASS and SPF_HELO_PASS rules hit several hundred messages a day. I am doing SPF lockup's at the MTA. How do I go about stopping these tests from within SA? Thanks, Ray

CFP open for ApacheCon Europe 2009 (fwd)

2008-10-02 Thread Justin Mason
--- Forwarded Message Date:Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:22:06 +0100 From:Noirin Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CFP open for ApacheCon Europe 2009 PMCs: Please send this on to your users@ lists! If you only have thirty seconds: The Call for Papers for ApacheC

RE: not everyone is happy with SA

2008-10-02 Thread Robert Taylor
So incredibly funny to have Stub Email referenced in an email to me. I was in on the original specification (by Nathan Cheng to CircleID) regarding this idea. I wish that it would be quickly adopted! Robot Terror (IRL: Robert Taylor) -Original Message- From: Robot Terror [mailto:[EM

Re: problem with RDNS_NONE: false positive

2008-10-02 Thread nik600
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Matthias Leisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Example: >> Received: from dadosoftware.com (dns2.dadosoftware.com [217.199.13.2]) -> >> OK >> >> Received: from dadosoftware.com (unknown [217.199.13.2]) -> FALSE POSITIVE > > I get timeouts on one of the servers (dns2

Re: problem with RDNS_NONE: false positive

2008-10-02 Thread nik600
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Rasmus Haslund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>From: nik600 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>And, in case of parse who decides to write dns2.dadosoftware.com > [217.199.13.2] instead of unknown >[217.199.13.2]? > > Your MTA decides to write unknown because it is most likely

Re: problem with RDNS_NONE: false positive

2008-10-02 Thread Matthias Leisi
> Example: > Received: from dadosoftware.com (dns2.dadosoftware.com [217.199.13.2]) -> > OK > > Received: from dadosoftware.com (unknown [217.199.13.2]) -> FALSE POSITIVE I get timeouts on one of the servers (dns2.bkom.it) responsible to resolve 217.199.13.2. This may explain the inconsistent beh

problem with RDNS_NONE: false positive

2008-10-02 Thread nik600
I'm experiencing a strange problem with RDNS_NONE. On the same sender host, sometimes it is marked with RDNS_NONE, and sometimes not. The host has a reverse dns! Example: Received: from dadosoftware.com (dns2.dadosoftware.com [217.199.13.2]) -> OK Received: from dadosoftware.com (unknown [217.1