I am sorry for being such a bad person. I am using Outlook Express as
mailclient and was not aware of the HTML code. Why is it such a big problem?
However after looking around in the mailclients setup I have changed it.
My background: I started to study computers about 1973. It was specialized
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
It's a lousy, braindead bare-word scanner, run by (or in front of) a
subscriber to this list. It's known, and has been discussed before. (Too
lazy to dig out the previous thread.)
Can we get the offender unsubscribed?
Is there a list policy to
Skip Morrow wrote:
On Sun, September 7, 2008 10:09 am, Skip wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
It was the
firewall. I go that fixed. Now, here's my next problem. I think taint
mode is stopping razor from running on my system. Since I can't be root,
I hav
PileOfMush wrote:
> Can someone help me understand why a message can come through and get
> one score, then I can scan it again 1 minute later and get a much
> higher score? Here's the message. http://slexy.org/raw/s2JoVC8OlP The
> top copy of the message was how it was scanned coming in. Immediate
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, PileOfMush wrote:
Can someone help me understand why a message can come through and get one
score, then I can scan it again 1 minute later and get a
much higher score? Here's the message. http://slexy.org/raw/s2JoVC8OlP The top
copy of the message was how it was scanned com
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 16:17 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >
> > What's got HTML to do with that?
>
> I believe mouss was talking about your prior message which likely was
> the trigger:
Wait. That is *not* my post. :)
I never, ever have been posting HTML to a mailing
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
What's got HTML to do with that?
I believe mouss was talking about your prior message which likely was
the trigger:
Subject: Can't build spamassassin 3.2.4 on HP-UX
Which was filled with HTML.
HTML shouldn't be posted to this list (or any list, IMHO.)
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 22:59 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Lars Ebeling wrote:
> > Got this after sending message earlier to this list. Could someone here
> > explain it?
>
> explain what?
Oh, come on, mouss, had a bad day? :)
> - stop posting html to the list
> - avoid posting spammy content. instead
Lars Ebeling wrote:
Got this after sending message earlier to this list. Could someone here
explain it?
explain what?
- stop posting html to the list
- avoid posting spammy content. instead, use your web server and post
the URL here.
even your server (apparently) said: PORN_URL_MISC.
anyw
Heinrich Christian Peters wrote:
Hello,
I recently got some mails (eg. [3]) from local daemons (eg. uucp,
fetchmail). This mails all got hit by MISSING_HEADERS, cause they have
no To:-field, which is optional [1]. In the last 7 days MISSING_HEADERS
didn't hit any spam-mail on my setup [2]. Have
Quoting Lars Ebeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Got this after sending message earlier to this list. Could someone
here explain it?
The most apparent explanation would be that Antigen is being stupid.
jp
--
Simple compliance is a hacker's best friend
-
Got this after sending message earlier to this list. Could someone here
explain it?
Regards
Lars Ebeling
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 5:26 PM
Subject: Antigen Notification: Antigen found a message matching
Hi Patrick,
relaxing from my hassle with the new machine :)
I'd like to set up a rule catching multiple dollar-signs in a message, I
don't see any other way to catch those heavily "encrypted" pill-emails like
this:
C A aN A DvAN P c cH A RM A oCY
VzA zG _RA - $1.48
C 9a A L u S - $2.2
SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
Solaris 9 SPARC
For the past few days I have noticed SpamAssassin takes much longer to process
messages between about 10:00am and 1:00pm EDT. It doesn't appear to be a
memory problem or a problem with our DNS server. To try to figure i
Like I said, if you can't get an answer here, ask on a Cpanel group.
This has nothing to do with SpamAssassin.
qsch wrote:
I dont know what to say all I am trying to do is get the spam (which is
currently going into my inbox) into the spam mail folder. I would assume
that I need to use filters
Hi all,
relaxing from my hassle with the new machine :)
I'd like to set up a rule catching multiple dollar-signs in a message, I
don't see any other way to catch those heavily "encrypted" pill-emails like
this:
C A aN A DvAN P c cH A RM A oCY
VzA zG _RA - $1.48
C 9a A L u S - $2.24
S0
qsch a écrit :
I dont know what to say all I am trying to do is get the spam (which is
currently going into my inbox) into the spam mail folder. I would assume
that I need to use filters but am not sure. It should be easy to do...
James Butler-2 wrote:
qsch wrote:
Hi I am using cpan
I dont know what to say all I am trying to do is get the spam (which is
currently going into my inbox) into the spam mail folder. I would assume
that I need to use filters but am not sure. It should be easy to do...
James Butler-2 wrote:
>
>>qsch wrote:
>>> Hi I am using cpanel and I was wonder
Hello,
I recently got some mails (eg. [3]) from local daemons (eg. uucp,
fetchmail). This mails all got hit by MISSING_HEADERS, cause they have
no To:-field, which is optional [1]. In the last 7 days MISSING_HEADERS
didn't hit any spam-mail on my setup [2]. Have any of you similar
ham-mails, which
Randal, Phil wrote:
Andrew Hearn wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
have you seen this?
http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
That bug in Red Hat perl will almost definitely slow down
SpamAssassin, too, I would say. Can anyone verify?
--j.
This fixed it for me on a couple
Andrew Hearn wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> have you seen this?
>>
>> http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
>>
>> That bug in Red Hat perl will almost definitely slow down
>> SpamAssassin, too, I would say. Can anyone verify?
>>
>> --j.
>>
>
> This fixed it for me on
Justin Mason wrote:
have you seen this?
http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
That bug in Red Hat perl will almost definitely slow down SpamAssassin,
too, I would say. Can anyone verify?
--j.
This fixed it for me on a couple of centos servers:
http://people.centos
22 matches
Mail list logo
