Nitin Bhadauria wrote:
mouss wrote:
Nitin Bhadauria wrote:
Hello All,
If i add my domain to the whitelist, i start getting spam mails from
my address
don't whitelist your domain in SA. This has probably polluted your AWL
and Bayes...
and when i remove white listing genuine mails from m
mouss wrote:
Nitin Bhadauria wrote:
Hello All,
If i add my domain to the whitelist, i start getting spam mails from
my address
don't whitelist your domain in SA. This has probably polluted your AWL
and Bayes...
and when i remove white listing genuine mails from my local domain
are comi
Damn! I should have RTFM!
Okay, I'm showing my inexperience here...
Firstly, thanks a lot Jared! Good to know this option exists. Also,
thanks to Henrik. I guess this would have been the easiest option since
apparently ShortCircuit.pm didn't exist.
Now, for the small fiasco...
When I ran a spa
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:18:38PM -0600, Brett Millett wrote:
>
> I was hoping to completely bypass spamassassin for mail originating in the
> local ip range or at least strip those emails of any spam checking
> headers. Any ideas how to accomplish this?
>
> The mail server is running Debian with
Hi,
Hoping somebody can help with a problem. For some time now, many of our
customers have been complaining that email that originates from our mail
exchange (local relays) is not being delivered to their customers. I
have checked rdns, blacklists, etc. I really am not sure why, but I am
tryi
Got about 110k worth of this in my hourly syslog snip today:
Sep 8 05:47:06 localhost spamd[13261]: Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected
continuation byte 0x8e, with no preceding start byte) in pattern match (m//)
at
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/70_sare_specific_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_ne
> I am currently running SA 3.2.4 on perl 5.8.8, and want to upgrade perl
> to 5.10.0
SA 3.2.5 adds in the perl version in order to fix this issue, because, yes,
it is perl specific.
Try upgrading to SA 3.2.5 with perl 5.8.8 (since you know 3.2.4 and 5.8.8
works). Test it a few days, then upgrad
I am currently running SA 3.2.4 on perl 5.8.8, and want to upgrade perl
to 5.10.0
After compiling perl 5.10.0 from source, and regenerating SA 3.2.4 using
the newly compiled perl binary, satisfying all Required Module
dependencies, I get a segmentation fault when trying to load compiled regex:
#
mouss-2 wrote:
>
> Nitin Bhadauria wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>>
>> If i add my domain to the whitelist, i start getting spam mails from my
>> address
>
> don't whitelist your domain in SA. This has probably polluted your AWL
> and Bayes...
>
>> and when i remove white listing genuine mails
>qsch wrote:
>> Hi I am using cpanel and I was wondering how to configure my email which
>is
>> horde to sent email marked as spam into spam folder. I am not sure if I
>have
>> to use and create a filter. I tried it but it didn't work. Thank You
>>
>If no one here's able to answer you, you may want
qsch wrote:
Hi I am using cpanel and I was wondering how to configure my email which is
horde to sent email marked as spam into spam folder. I am not sure if I have
to use and create a filter. I tried it but it didn't work. Thank You
If no one here's able to answer you, you may want to ask on
Hi I am using cpanel and I was wondering how to configure my email which is
horde to sent email marked as spam into spam folder. I am not sure if I have
to use and create a filter. I tried it but it didn't work. Thank You
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-to-gt-email-by-
Hi normally this is a timeout issue, check your dns (local caching dns on the
spamd server helps alot) andake you are not running all rbls as this can take
along time.
--
martin
-Original Message-
From: ersteller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 6:35 PM
To: users@sp
I removed the [#]s from the beginning of the live and the test debugs and
opened them in KDiff3 and it becomes really apparent around like 57 in on
file and 108 in the other that they aren't both running the same tests. One
appears to only be running 10_default_prefs.cf.
--
View this message
hallo
I use SpamAssassin with a PLESK Control Panel.
Very often I receive spam not "worked by" SpamAssassin, can anybody please
explain the reason?
Here a very interesting case: two almost equal mails, one worked by
SpamAssassin and one not... Why???
*** this NOT seen by SpamAssassin (Subj
Justin Mason wrote:
have you seen this?
http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
That bug in Red Hat perl will almost definitely slow down SpamAssassin,
too, I would say. Can anyone verify?
--j.
I don't notice any difference between my RHEL 4 (not affected) and my
R
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> However, Centos 5.2 32-bit and perl 5.8.8 chokes:
>
> time perl perltest.pl
> ..
> real0m4.312s
> user0m4.272s
> sys 0m0.036s
As does CentOS 5.2 64-bit and perl 5.8.8:
# time perl perltest.pl
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 10:03 AM
> To: Justin Mason
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: using RHEL / CentOS / Fedora perl?
>
> I can verify that CentOS release 4.6 (Final) with perl, v5.8.5 bu
On Sun, September 7, 2008 10:09 am, Skip wrote:
>
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> It was the
>>> firewall. I go that fixed. Now, here's my next problem. I think taint
>>> mode is stopping razor from running on my system. Since I can't be root,
>>> I have to install Razor in my home home director
Justin Mason wrote:
have you seen this?
http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
That bug in Red Hat perl will almost definitely slow down SpamAssassin,
too, I would say. Can anyone verify?
--j.
I can verify that CentOS release 4.6 (Final) with perl, v5.8.5 built
for
On 8-Sep-08, at 6:38 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
have you seen this?
http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
That bug in Red Hat perl will almost definitely slow down
SpamAssassin,
too, I would say. Can anyone verify?
--j.
I know as far as centos goes, there are some
have you seen this?
http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
That bug in Red Hat perl will almost definitely slow down SpamAssassin,
too, I would say. Can anyone verify?
--j.
nightduke wrote:
Hi i'm trying to use rblcheck at my spamassassin but it dosen't work.
Here's my local.cf file
cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
# These values can be overridden by editing ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.cf
# (see spamassassin(1) for details)
# These should be safe assumptions an
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:24 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: rblcheck not working
>
> > Hi i'm trying to use rblcheck at my spamassassin but it dosen't work.
>
>
> > What's wrong?
>
> Hi i'm trying to use rblcheck at my spamassassin but it dosen't work.
> What's wrong?
>
> Nightduke
>
Sorry, too early in the morning, sarcasm alert:
There is no way in the world to tell what is wrong.
Post the email to your web site with a link (don't post it here).
Possibilities include n
Hi i'm trying to use rblcheck at my spamassassin but it dosen't work.
Here's my local.cf file
cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
# These values can be overridden by editing ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.cf
# (see spamassassin(1) for details)
# These should be safe assumptions and allow for simple
26 matches
Mail list logo
