On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:59 PM, RobertH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, the code works for me. If someone has a better solution I'll
>> switch to yours. I just created it because I needed it and thought I'd
>> share it with others who might need it. But if any of you want to
>> improve i
looks like (despite GA's TOS forbidding using GA to track personal
information and email), spammers are starting to use GA to track their spam.
Not unlike all the other WEB bugs that SA knows how to track.
given a GA like this in an email:
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protoc
>
> Well, the code works for me. If someone has a better solution I'll
> switch to yours. I just created it because I needed it and thought I'd
> share it with others who might need it. But if any of you want to
> improve it or replace it with something better I'm always looking for
> new tricks.
Well, the code works for me. If someone has a better solution I'll
switch to yours. I just created it because I needed it and thought I'd
share it with others who might need it. But if any of you want to
improve it or replace it with something better I'm always looking for
new tricks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:54 PM
> To: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: 'Giampaolo Tomassoni'; 'Marc Perkel'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Handy script for generating /etc/resolv.conf
>
> On 31 Aug 2008, Giampaolo
mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can check the DKIM signature if you have an unaltered copy of the
> message. but whether it's good or not, the IP is belongs to google.
Yep. Google has become a consistent source of spam, much like (though to
a lesser degree) Yahoo. Their postmasters an
On 31 Aug 2008, Giampaolo Tomassoni outgrape:
> Uff!
>
> Stock glibc v.2.6.1, source file resolv/res_libc.c, line#167:
>
> if (stat (_PATH_RESCONF, &statbuf) == 0 && last_mtime !=
> statbuf.st_mtime) {
>
> _PATH_RESCONF is /etc/resolv.conf; last_mtime is the last modify time (the
> previous
Skip wrote:
How about these rules? (watch the line wrap)
describe TO_HARVESTED To: obviously harvested
header TO_HARVESTED To =~ /\@(?:(?:(?:example|your|
some)\.domain)|(?:(?:example|your\.domain)\.com)|your\.favou?rite
\.machine)\b/
Can you tell me how this rule works?
it catches m
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 14:33 -0400, Skip wrote:
describe TO_HARVESTED To: obviously harvested
header TO_HARVESTED To =~ /\@(?:(?:(?:example|your|
some)\.domain)|(?:(?:example|your\.domain)\.com)|your\.favou?rite
\.machine)\b/
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 14:33 -0400, Skip wrote:
> >> describe TO_HARVESTED To: obviously harvested
> >> header TO_HARVESTED To =~ /\@(?:(?:(?:example|your|
> >> some)\.domain)|(?:(?:example|your\.domain)\.com)|your\.favou?rite
> >> \.machine)\b/
>
> Can you tell me how this rule works? Or give a
CPAN install fails consistently. E.g.,
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
---
t/spamc_optC.t94 2 4 6 8
t/spamc_optL.t 16 16 1-16
34 tests skipped.
Failed 2/143 test
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 19:50 +0200, mouss wrote:
> John Hardin wrote:
> >
> > How about these rules? (watch the line wrap)
> >
> > describe TO_HARVESTED To: obviously harvested
> > header TO_HARVESTED To =~ /\@(?:(?:(?:example|your|
> > some)\.domain)|(?:(?:example|your\.domain)\.com)|your\.favou
> -Original Message-
> From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:23 PM
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Handy script for generating /etc/resolv.conf
>
> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Nix [mailto:[EMAIL
How about these rules? (watch the line wrap)
describe TO_HARVESTED To: obviously harvested
header TO_HARVESTED To =~ /\@(?:(?:(?:example|your|
some)\.domain)|(?:(?:example|your\.domain)\.com)|your\.favou?rite
\.machine)\b/
Can you tell me how this rule works? Or give a more realistic ex
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 07:32 -0400, Skip wrote:
Got this one today. Never seen anything like this before.
http://pelorus.org/mix
(I couldn't even paste into pastebin--their spam catcher caught it)
I've noticed that too. it's annoying. time to setup a post-bin...
This one
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 5:12 PM
To: Marc Perkel
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Handy script for generating /etc/resolv.conf
On 28 Aug 2008, Marc Perkel told this:
Here's something I
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 07:32 -0400, Skip wrote:
> Got this one today. Never seen anything like this before.
> http://pelorus.org/mix
>
> (I couldn't even paste into pastebin--their spam catcher caught it)
> This one only scored a 2.9 on my installation, as you can see. I do
> have some custom
> -Original Message-
> From: Nix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 6:18 PM
> To: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: 'Marc Perkel'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Handy script for generating /etc/resolv.conf
>
> On 31 Aug 2008, Giampaolo Tomassoni stated:
>
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Nix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 6:18 PM
> To: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: 'Marc Perkel'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Handy script for generating /etc/resolv.conf
>
> On 31 Aug 2008, Giampaolo Tomassoni stated:
>
> >
On 31 Aug 2008, Giampaolo Tomassoni stated:
>> How do you arrange that all the existing programs that have already
>> sucked in resolv.conf note the change? They're generally not going to
>> unless you restart them: nothing polls resolv.conf looking for changes
>> to it as far as I know, that woul
> -Original Message-
> From: Nix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 5:12 PM
> To: Marc Perkel
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Handy script for generating /etc/resolv.conf
>
> On 28 Aug 2008, Marc Perkel told this:
>
> > Here's something I threw to
On 28 Aug 2008, Marc Perkel told this:
> Here's something I threw together to make sure the /etc/resolv.conf
> points to a working nameserver. I run this once a minute.
How do you arrange that all the existing programs that have already
sucked in resolv.conf note the change? They're generally not
On Sunday 31 August 2008 7:18 am, Skip wrote:
> > This one only scored a 2.9 on my installation, as you can see. I do
> > have some custom rules (Saught and SARE) but no hits there.
> >
> > Skip
>
> Oops... I meant to include this the first time. These were the rules
> that it triggered on my ins
This one only scored a 2.9 on my installation, as you can see. I do
have some custom rules (Saught and SARE) but no hits there.
Skip
Oops... I meant to include this the first time. These were the rules
that it triggered on my installation:
X-Spam-Report:
* 2.5 HEAD_LONG Message header
Got this one today. Never seen anything like this before.
http://pelorus.org/mix
(I couldn't even paste into pastebin--their spam catcher caught it)
This one only scored a 2.9 on my installation, as you can see. I do
have some custom rules (Saught and SARE) but no hits there.
Skip
--
Get
25 matches
Mail list logo
