I wish that they can modify the High speed
AntiRadiation Missile (HARM) or similar type of
missile from other country and have it find the
bot head (which is real source of the spam and
not bot slaves) the blast them with those.
Obviously, we need to get the hold of the bot
controls and defus
On Friday 15 August 2008, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
>2008/8/15 John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> From a Slashdot thread about somebody suddenly seeing no spam on their
>> mail feed and wondering why:
>>
>> A group of the original SpamAssassin developers got together
>> with a group of mercenari
John Hardin wrote:
> Is there any reason the base rules should _not_ contain a
> whitelist_from_spf or whitelist_from_rcvd for the list?
Larry Nedry wrote:
> Would you really want to auto-train your bayes with mail from this list?
The whitelist rules are ignored when SpamAssassin decides whether
On 8/15/08 at 8:07 AM -0700 John Hardin wrote:
>Is there any reason the base rules should _not_ contain a
>whitelist_from_spf or whitelist_from_rcvd for the list?
Would you really want to auto-train your bayes with mail from this list?
Nedry
You could write yourself a rawbody rule to match on the string: td>NEVOB>> "Dietmar Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/14/08 1:53 AM >>>
Recently there are tons of simple mails like:
ftp://pve.proxmox.com/tmp/sample-spam1.txt
ftp://pve.proxmox.com/tmp/sample-spam2.txt
Seems that they trigger some
Perhaps "Spambuster MX" :-)
Targets the originator and destroys the target!
On Friday 15 August 2008, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
> 2008/8/15 John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > From a Slashdot thread about somebody suddenly seeing no spam on their
> > mail feed and wondering why:
> >
> > A group
2008/8/15 John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> From a Slashdot thread about somebody suddenly seeing no spam on their mail
> feed and wondering why:
>
> A group of the original SpamAssassin developers got together
> with a group of mercenaries and created SpammerAssassin. It's
> in alpha, and look
From a Slashdot thread about somebody suddenly seeing no spam on their
mail feed and wondering why:
A group of the original SpamAssassin developers got together
with a group of mercenaries and created SpammerAssassin. It's
in alpha, and looks good except it seems to have started a
teeny-
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Greg Troxel wrote:
Sort of related, occasionally some messages on the list get so many
points that my MTA rejects them (score > 10).
I looked on the wiki, and haven't found pre-cooked rules for this.
Is there any reason the base rules should _not_ contain a
whitelist_fro
Greg Troxel wrote:
Sort of related, occasionally some messages on the list get so many
points that my MTA rejects them (score > 10). I'd like to not do that,
since it seems rude to the list (although ezmlm seems to not really
care). I'm guessing that I need a custom rule to assign negative poin
I assume subscribers to the SpamAssassin users list know that it's
spam, though ;)
Unfortunately it didn't score that high:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=1.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 autolearn=no
version=3.2.5
Sort of related, occasionally some messages on the list get so many
points t
Hi!
maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks like
it has been sent by this mailinglist.
yeah, sorry about that. I accidentally moderated it through.
I assume subscribers to the SpamAssassin users list know that it's
spam, though ;)
ROFL ... SA list, of all p
Hi *,
Am 2008-08-01 19:28:44, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> Right, spamassassin scored the spams with only -0.8 to +1.9 and I had to
> install an additional procmail rule which now capture arround 99.9% of
> it. But I should mention, that I get curently arround 180.000 per day.
Since Saturday 20
Am 2008-08-03 13:06:20, schrieb Robert - elists:
> SNIP - almost 300k of debug baloney
>
> Munroe,
>
> Sending out 300k on a mailing list is not a very bright decision
The message had 92 kByte...
> That is why pastebin etc is used.
>
> You probably sent out many gigabytes of data via the list
Saw it here as well. Good thinkin' spammer, send it to the list! Job
well done.
Thanks,
James
> -Original Message-
> From: Arvid Ephraim Picciani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 7:16 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Fwd: Attn: webmail Subscriber
On 15.08.08 13:16, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks like
> it has been sent by this mailinglist.
yes, it was. I wonder if someone bounces it here or if it was really
directed here...
Content-Description: "WEB-MAILTEAMS" <[EMA
Arvid Ephraim Picciani writes:
> maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks like
> it has been sent by this mailinglist.
yeah, sorry about that. I accidentally moderated it through.
I assume subscribers to the SpamAssassin users list know that it's
spam, though ;)
maybe i'm missinterpreting the headers, but this message actually looks like
it has been sent by this mailinglist.
--
best regards
Arvid Ephraim Picciani
--- Begin Message ---
Attn: webmail Subscriber:
This mail is to inform all our webmail Subscriber that would will be
upgrading our site i
18 matches
Mail list logo
