Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to configure SA to check only last Received address
against RBL tests ??? I would like to avoid checking ALL Received
addresses, because they can possible have DSL/cable addresses that can
be blacklisted somewhere.
I would
Hello,
Is it possible to configure SA to check only last Received address
against RBL tests ??? I would like to avoid checking ALL Received
addresses, because they can possible have DSL/cable addresses that can
be blacklisted somewhere.
I would like, if possible, to check only last
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 00:55:50 mouss wrote:
Ken A wrote:
Can be a probe too. Accepting mail from that IP with that content says
something about your system. Spammers aren't stupid. They fingerprint us
just like we fingerprint them.
If I was a spammer, I don't
Moderated, Cc'ing the OP. Please do subscribe to a mailing list, before
posting.
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 14:13 -0400, Debbie Fister wrote:
> 1. How do I view the spam box? I want to double check and make sure no
>legitimate email is not there.
Ask your administrator. SA itself just scans and
1. How do I view the spam box? I want to double check and make sure no
legitimate email is not there.
2. How do I configure Spam Assassin so legitimate email comes to me?
I ask these questions because the number of spam email has drastically
decreased even though I have disabled th
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 09:21 -0500, Ken A wrote:
> Yes. And also, in any war, consider resource usage.
> A simple example: Spammer at any given time may have access to a number
> of DNSRBL listed bots, and a number of unlisted bots. With an
> understanding of how ISP handles filtering based on a
ram wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 09:21 -0500, Ken A wrote:
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 00:55:50 mouss wrote:
Ken A wrote:
Can be a probe too. Accepting mail from that IP with that content says
something about your system. Spammers aren't stupid. They fingerprint us
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 01:31 +0200, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> No. Some spammers are a lot more clever then that.
> Especialy if you sell lists, you usually make sure they are high quality.
> This is a low volume probe. Propably to clean out harvested lists.
What makes you believe this is lo
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 09:21 -0500, Ken A wrote:
> Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 00:55:50 mouss wrote:
> >> Ken A wrote:
> >>> Can be a probe too. Accepting mail from that IP with that content says
> >>> something about your system. Spammers aren't stupid. They fingerpr
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 00:55:50 mouss wrote:
Ken A wrote:
Can be a probe too. Accepting mail from that IP with that content says
something about your system. Spammers aren't stupid. They fingerprint us
just like we fingerprint them.
If I was a spammer, I don't
On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
>On 7/29/2008 4:38 PM, Kevin Parris wrote:
>> Sample posted here: http://pastebin.com/m7d993dc7
>>
>> Have seen several similar to this, the message contains only random
>> words, no images, no web links. What's the point? It's not
>> advertising
On 7/29/2008 4:38 PM, Kevin Parris wrote:
Sample posted here: http://pastebin.com/m7d993dc7
Have seen several similar to this, the message contains only random
words, no images, no web links. What's the point? It's not
advertising, or trying to lure victims to a site, or carrying any
payload.
> Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
>>
>> I have created the directory, restartet sa-spamd, run sa-update, but
>> the /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/ directory is empty?
>
> Did you run sa-update, or sa-learn? You have to learn something before
> it will create the files.
>
> Try running sa-learn with th
13 matches
Mail list logo
