Hello Sir,
Thanks for the support and thanks for the list my spams are now reduced..
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> I just blacklisted you. stop what you are doing.
> Eh? What did Nitin do that's so wrong? It's perfectly ordinary to expect
> folks to post spam samples here. You asked for full hea
> Why would I not be whitelisted here? I have the
> following entrines in
> my user_prefs file
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] pelorus.org
> internal_networks 192.168/16
> internal_networks 69.89.22.106
It seems pelorus.org is your mx for incoming mail.
According this the snippet, and y
Why would I not be whitelisted here? I have the following entrines in
my user_prefs file
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] pelorus.org
internal_networks 192.168/16
internal_networks 69.89.22.106
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on box106.bluehost.com
Nitin Bhadauria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here i am attaching file with some mails ..
[...]
The attachment was caught by ClamAV sanesecurity signature; consider
deploying that in front of SA.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yves Goergen wrote:
On 24.07.2008 08:32 CE(S)T, Matt Kettler wrote:
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Since many mailservers will query the same DNS-related information (eg
DNSxL lookups on widely-used mailservers like eg from Yahoo, or from
the
same botnets), traffic savings through caching are _conside
On Thursday 24 July 2008 22:33:25 Yves Goergen wrote:
> I'm forwarding this issue to the Hetzner support team now. It seems that
> some other customers have the same problem.
hetzner dns is broken since forver. as well as their dhcp and their swicthes
and don't get me started. just don't us
I noticed something about my spamd processes.
There is a "main" process at the top that spawns children.
5 of 6 of the top memory (by %) are 'spamd'.
5/6 top Resident (28M for parent), 40m-49m /child (268M total + parent)
5/7 top Data users (26M for parent) 38-47m/child (259M total + parent)
So
On 24.07.2008 08:32 CE(S)T, Matt Kettler wrote:
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Since many mailservers will query the same DNS-related information (eg
DNSxL lookups on widely-used mailservers like eg from Yahoo, or from the
same botnets), traffic savings through caching are _considerable_.
True, but you
I am now getting loads of these:
Jul 24 08:46:57 d_baron spamd[5965]: spamd: still running as root: user not
specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobody
scantime=7.6,size=1901,user=root,uid=65534,required_score=5.0,rhost=ip6-
localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=36060,mid=<[EM
Michael Scheidell wrote:
I just blacklisted you. stop what you are doing.
Eh? What did Nitin do that's so wrong? It's perfectly ordinary to expect
folks to post spam samples here. You asked for full headers, and got them.
Admittedly they've been mozillified, but...
you need professional help
I just blacklisted you. stop what you are doing.
you need professional help. read the faq's, read the man pages.
_
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.spa
amazon.com has a decade long history of spamming and should not be in
the def_whitelist_from_spf or dnswl.
they have a history of rfc abuse (the bounce emails to abuse@, with 'if
you wish to report fraud or phish, go to this url, jump though these
hoops), or just bounce their abuse@ address du
You need professional help if you don't know that.
_
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com
__
scores hire enough here. (even with the -15 point credits for mailing
list ) without it , would have scored over 21 points.
always best to put that email on a web page if you want people to be
able to check the scores, especially spam. without doing that, you
poison the AWL scores for users@sp
14 matches
Mail list logo
