Sorry not sure what I was doing wrong before but it is hitting now.
Thanks
Kate
Jared Hall wrote:
header LOCAL_REMINDERSubject =~ /^REMINDER NOTIFICATION/
score LOCAL_REMINDER5.0
Regards,
Jared Hall
General Telecom, LLC.
Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
Hi all,
I have
Hi Jared,
Thanks for the help. I have made the file LOCALK.cf in my
/etc/mail/spamassassin/ folder and run spamassassin --lint (no errors)
However when I test the message it is not hitting the rule.
Am I supposed to reload a service or is there something else I have missed?
Thanks
Kate
Jared
Hi all,
I was testing a rule using the spamassassin -D --lint and I noticed a
few errors like the one below. Does this mean one of my rulesets is out
of date?
meta test KAM_BLANK01 has undefined dependency 'UNDISC_RECIPS'
Thanks
Kate
Hi,
Our system does train Ham and I do train spam that gets through (where
possible).
I thought though that training say 5 emails as spam (assuming they were
all the same) won't necessarily change the Bayes confidence, is this not
correct?
Kate
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Alex Woick wrote:
BAY
> if mail contains Received headers indicating that mail was forwarded by a
> trusted hop (a hop is not necessarily a box. it may be a proxy, an MTA
> instance, ... etc), then addresses may have been rewritten and are thus
> "untrusted".
On my box there's only my mail server & SA. No proxies etc.
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 21:01 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Nice looking script, where can I download it?
>
I found it here:
http://markmail.org/download.xqy?id=pb36yqssesebgdhj&number=1
-Bill
Nice looking script, where can I download it?
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>|SECNAP Network Security
Winner 2008 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
FreeBSD SpamAssassin Ports maintainer
_
This email has been scanned and cer
Wil Decius wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:30 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If mail is forwarded by a trusted hop before SA, you need
always_trust_envelope_sender=1
There's nothing special about this SA installation. It's just SA
running @ "mail.mydomain.com". I'm doing no f
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:30 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If mail is forwarded by a trusted hop before SA, you need
>
> always_trust_envelope_sender=1
There's nothing special about this SA installation. It's just SA
running @ "mail.mydomain.com". I'm doing no forwarding from one box
to
On Sunday 13 July 2008 5:56 pm, Bill Randle wrote:
> >
> > I'm not good at scripts so possibly you could find a way to fix this? I
> > would have emailed you privately however, I don't have your email address
> > so had to post to the list.
>
> Chris,
>
> This is actually working as designed. Acco
Wil Decius wrote:
I'm trying to get Spamassassin local configuration setup to
whitleist-by-SPF. The box, as delivered to me, runs Debian with
spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.2.5-r609689
running on Perl version 5.8.8
In local.cf I've added
whitelist_from_spf [EMAIL PR
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 16:52 -0500, Chris wrote:
> Bowie, you wrote this script back in 2006, I've been running it since back in
> Aug 0f 2006 and today just noticed something. The addition doesn't seem to be
> quite right. For instance:
>
> FreeMail.cf:
> Rule Name Score
Bowie, you wrote this script back in 2006, I've been running it since back in
Aug 0f 2006 and today just noticed something. The addition doesn't seem to be
quite right. For instance:
FreeMail.cf:
Rule Name Score Ham Spam %of Ham %of Spam
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:24:29 -0400:
> This means there weren't enough tokens in the message.
Thanks, Theo, for the quick answer.
Ok, false alarm? I used a real message and now I get Bayes and a score.
BUT:
I ran the lint under 3.2.4 on two different machines. The first show
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 06:09:03PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I get a weird Bayes result on one of my machines. It tells me there are
> too few tokens, although it should have much more than enough.
>
> [29963] dbg: bayes: cannot use bayes on this message; not enough usable
> tokens found
Thi
I get a weird Bayes result on one of my machines. It tells me there are
too few tokens, although it should have much more than enough.
SA 3.2.4, Bayes on local db.
[29963] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1215920690
[29963] dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 62748, nham = 42637
[29963] dbg:
Hi chris,
Am 2008-07-10 19:45:30, schrieb Chris:
> Anyone seen these lately? The spam consists of a multi-mb .pps between 3 and
> as of this occurance 6.8mb. I've got my procmail recipe for calling sa set to
> 3mb currently:
Since you are calling spamassassin from procmail, I would not even all
Alex Woick wrote:
BAYES_00 means that the bayes engine thinks the message is definitely
not spam. If this rule is hitting on spam messages, you have a problem.
Unless this is just a really hammy looking spam, you may want to
consider retraining your bayes database. And regardless, you should
al
18 matches
Mail list logo
