Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

Kathryn Kleinschafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have some spam coming into the system that seems to be only going to a > couple of domains. [...] > The subject line is always REMINDER NOTIFICATION > > In order to get it recognised as spam am I best to have a custom rule for > t

Re: spam getting through because of bayes confidence

header LOCAL_REMINDERSubject =~ /^REMINDER NOTIFICATION/ score LOCAL_REMINDER5.0 Regards, Jared Hall General Telecom, LLC. Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote: Hi all, I have some spam coming into the system that seems to be only going to a couple of domains. The bayes confi

spam getting through because of bayes confidence

Hi all, I have some spam coming into the system that seems to be only going to a couple of domains. The bayes confidence is 0-1% for the spam so it is getting a -2.6. It is hitting on the following rules -2.60 BAYES_00Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% -0.19 CRM114_CHECK 2.17

Re: SA and legitimate mails.

Spamassassin checks all mails passed to it. So you need to not pass any mail to it you don't want scanned. I'd ask on a qmail list if you don't get any suggestions here. Marcin Praczko wrote: Hi There, I have a question about SA and legitimate mails. Main mail server is receiving a lot of em

Re: SA and legitimate mails.

On Jul 9, 2008, at 7:12, "Marcin Praczko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi There, I have a question about SA and legitimate mails. Main mail server is receiving a lot of emails from Internet, and should to filter mails (which are spam and which are not spam). But also it is sending a lot of l

SA and legitimate mails.

Hi There, I have a question about SA and legitimate mails. Main mail server is receiving a lot of emails from Internet, and should to filter mails (which are spam and which are not spam). But also it is sending a lot of legitimate emails. On this server are quite a lot of virtual domains. So

Re: How to make an exception to URIBL_SBL

On Wednesday, July 9, 2008, 3:03:32 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: >> whitelist_to *.example.com >> whitelist_from *example.com >> > These should be > whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Stupid boy! (Slaps self on wrist). > Martin URIBL_SBL checks the IP addresses

Re: How to make an exception to URIBL_SBL

> whitelist_to *.example.com > whitelist_from *example.com > These should be whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stupid boy! (Slaps self on wrist). Martin

Re: How to make an exception to URIBL_SBL

On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 07:27, ram wrote: > One of our customers domain is hitting URIBL_SBL. For no fault of his , > his DNS provider is listed > > So mails containing his own domain links get marked spam > How do I make an exception to this ? Is there a way to say for known > list of domains do n

Re: How to make an exception to URIBL_SBL

On 7/9/2008 8:27 AM, ram wrote: One of our customers domain is hitting URIBL_SBL. For no fault of his , his DNS provider is listed So mails containing his own domain links get marked spam How do I make an exception to this ? Is there a way to say for known list of domains do no uri checks I

Re: Spamassassin hang on bayes

Matus UHLAR - fantomas ha scritto: On 09.07.08 09:36, Paolo De Marco wrote: This problem still reappears also with SpamAssassin 3.2.5 Plese, there is a BIG problem with spamassassin!! Some mail locks spamassassin and the entire mail system! I can't understand which the problem

Re: Spamassassin hang on bayes

On 09.07.08 09:36, Paolo De Marco wrote: > This problem still reappears also with SpamAssassin 3.2.5 > >Plese, there is a BIG problem with spamassassin!! > > > >Some mail locks spamassassin and the entire mail system! > > > >I can't understand which the problem is, but is becoming a very very big

Re: Spamassassin hang on bayes

This problem still reappears also with SpamAssassin 3.2.5 No one can help me? Thanks -- Paolo De Marco Plese, there is a BIG problem with spamassassin!! Some mail locks spamassassin and the entire mail system! I can't understand which the problem is, but is becoming a very very big problem!