I am seeing a clear downtrend in the number for spams hitting our
servers, I am not sure why ? Since Last week spams are at 50% of what
they used to be last month. Is this what you all are seeing
But the irritant 419's are still coming in ( and some get past SA ),
in many new variants. I have
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
>
> metamorph wrote:
>> James Lay wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/22/08 9:30 PM, "metamorph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
Spamassassin/Clamav/Ubuntu/PHP5/Apache2/citadel/
I just installed spamassasin and tested it with gtube and it worked,
but
when
On Tue, June 24, 2008 01:10, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> I'm guess this doesn't work:
> amavis[31206]: (31206-01) SPAM-TAG, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, Yes,
> score=7.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8,
> BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, JM_SOUGHT_3=4, JM_SOU
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
On Monday 23 June 2008 18:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, June 23, 2008 14:33, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sought_rules.cf with this content:
score JM_SOUGHT_1 2.2
meta JM_SOUGHT_1_ADJ (JM_SOUGHT_1)
score JM_SOUGHT_1_A
On Monday 23 June 2008 18:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Mon, June 23, 2008 14:33, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin/sought_rules.cf with this content:
> > score JM_SOUGHT_1 2.2
>
> meta JM_SOUGHT_1_ADJ (JM_SOUGHT_1)
> score JM_SOUGHT_1_ADJ -0.1
>
> > score JM_SOUGHT_2
On Mon, June 23, 2008 21:27, mouss wrote:
> 14400 is 4 hours (4*3660) which is a bit low for an MX 86400 (24
> hours) is probably better.
nice calc for 4 hours :-)
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
Justin Mason wrote:
The dirs are lexically sorted by the hostname they're downloaded from.
So if you name your hosts "zz-local-sa-updates.domain.org" for example,
those rules will be loaded after "updates.SpamAssassin.org".
Butbutbut that's so *ugly*.
(I figured I'd have to do that
metamorph wrote:
James Lay wrote:
On 6/22/08 9:30 PM, "metamorph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Spamassassin/Clamav/Ubuntu/PHP5/Apache2/citadel/
I just installed spamassasin and tested it with gtube and it worked, but
when I tried to install clamav it still lets the EICAR files through.
James Lay wrote:
>
>
> On 6/22/08 9:30 PM, "metamorph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Spamassassin/Clamav/Ubuntu/PHP5/Apache2/citadel/
>>
>> I just installed spamassasin and tested it with gtube and it worked, but
>> when I tried to install clamav it still lets the EICAR files through.
Marc Ferguson wrote:
Hi,
I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in simplified
language. Thanks.
I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out spam (
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks). I'm using Evolution at
home and on my laptop and I
Marc Perkel wrote:
Marc Ferguson wrote:
Hi,
I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in
simplified language. Thanks.
I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out
spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks). I'm using
Evolution at home an
Re,
I excluded the last two rules from my masscheck to avoid FPs as these
ESPs/X-Mailers are definitely grey, "import rcpt list and blast" sort of ESPs
not black for global use.
If you can point me to some more information on how to do that, on-list or
off-list, I am interested. I am new to
Hi,
You run "seek-phrases-in-corpus" over the 2 corpora, and it'll spit out
the patterns; you can then write rules based on these.
I did so, the results are interesting, though I do not really know where
to go from there. If I take the first 50 "best" patterns and strip off the
obvious stand
Marc Ferguson wrote:
Hi,
I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in
simplified language. Thanks.
I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out
spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks). I'm using
Evolution at home and on my laptop and
On Mon, June 23, 2008 14:33, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/sought_rules.cf with this content:
> score JM_SOUGHT_1 2.2
meta JM_SOUGHT_!_ADJ (JM_SOUGHT_1)
score JM_SOUGHT_!_ADJ -0.1
> score JM_SOUGHT_2 2.2
meta JM_SOUGHT_2_ADJ (JM_SOUGHT_2)
score JM_SOUGHT
On 6/23/2008 4:36 PM, John GALLET wrote:
Hi,
First of all, thanks to Justin for patiently helping me to install
mass-check and pointing me in the right direction. I will try to run the
algorithms tonight to see what they come up with.
In the meantime, you can find a hit-frequencies report at
Thanks for taking this burden upon yourself. One other thing you should be
prepared to do, if you're willing to devote long-term responsibility to these
rules, is to provide sa-update-compatible feeds of your dynamic rules. This
is another thing that Justin can probably help you with.
I am hap
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
But now I get a lint warning:
# spamassassin --lint
[12533] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule JM_SOUGHT_3
The problem is that the sought ruleset has sometimes three rules and sometimes
only two rules. But I don't like to change my c
Re,
Looking at the rules, I'm worried about false positives on genuine opt-in
advertising. I have a number of users who choose to receive all kinds of
advertising blurb,
This is one of the reasons why I did not hunt for "click here" and "if you
can't see this email in html". Now correct me i
John GALLET a écrit :
Any feedback on the results (not enough in corpus, bad rules, good
rules, etc.) appreciated.
Looking at the rules, I'm worried about false positives on genuine
opt-in advertising. I have a number of users who choose to receive all
kinds of advertising blurb, so I'll run
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, John GALLET wrote:
First of all, thanks to Justin for patiently helping me to install
mass-check and pointing me in the right direction.
Applause for Justin! This is the sort of thing we need to see for many
more specialized spam categories...
I will try to run the alg
Marc Ferguson escribió:
Hi,
I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in
simplified language. Thanks.
I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out
spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks). I'm using
Evolution at home and on my laptop
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, McDonald, Dan wrote:
But I'm not convinced that twiddling with fake MX records will reduce
your spam level any.
Cue Mr. Perkel... :)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
First of all, thanks to Justin for patiently helping me to install
mass-check and pointing me in the right direction. I will try to run the
algorithms tonight to see what they come up with.
In the meantime, you can find a hit-frequencies report at:
http://www.saphirtech.fr/spam/freqs_2008
Kris Deugau writes:
> Is it possible to determine the order channel-originated rulesets will
> be loaded in? Or *cause* a specific channel's rules to be loaded after
> another?
>
> I'm looking at creating several local channels for distributing local
> rules across the collection of mismatche
Marc Ferguson schrieb am 20.06.2008 16:38:
I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out
spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks). I'm using
Evolution at home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin so
I'm constantly clicking the "junk" icon.
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:38 -0400, Marc Ferguson wrote:
> Hi,
> I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out
> spam (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks). I'm using
> Evolution at home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin plugin
> so I'm constantly cli
On 20.06.08 10:38, Marc Ferguson wrote:
> I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in simplified
> language. Thanks.
>
> I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out spam (
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks). I'm using Evolution at
> home
Hi,
I'm a linux noob and a spam assassin noob so please reply in simplified
language. Thanks.
I saw on the wiki a trick to use fake mx records in order to weed out spam (
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OtherTricks). I'm using Evolution at
home and on my laptop and I have the spamassassin p
Hello list,
I'm using JM's sought ruleset, but the default score is in my opinion to high.
That's why I have the following file:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sought_rules.cf
with this content:
score JM_SOUGHT_1 2.2
score JM_SOUGHT_2 2.2
score JM_SOUGHT_3
On 23.06.08 02:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running spamassassin with postfix via amavisd on a FreeBSD Intel box.
> Email from Nintendo's Wii service is getting flagged as spam, despite me
> entering it into the whitelist. This seems to be the case with other
> unrelated entries that I ha
On 20.06.08 13:20, raulbe wrote:
> Couple new errors now :(
>
> config: cannot write to /var/spool/uucp/.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such
> file or directory
>
>
> spamd[19476]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> for uucp:10
there are independent on those you reported before... S
> On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:49 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> >10.x is (supposedly) not routable on the public internet. If you see
> >10.x (or other RFC-1918) traffic coming in from the world, your ISP
> >is broken.
On 20.06.08 11:57, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Does your ISP filter egress packets on your inter
On Mon, June 23, 2008 08:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] bsaa42453.tk.mesh.ad.jp
def_whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dont use both since its 2 diff scores, and only use the one that are needed
here is the spf
http://old.ope
34 matches
Mail list logo
