Re: trusted_networks set in local.cf, but not according to sa-update

2008-06-21 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 21/06/2008 10:45 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: >>> I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags: >>> >>> [20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended >>> that y

Re: FM_BIG_REASON scoring

2008-06-21 Thread Sahil Tandon
Robert - elists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Threshold? Yes, threshold. > Huh? What is so confusing? > You are joking right? No. > The default SA scoring spam tagging threshold is half that... Exactly. That is why I said it does seem high (in this case, assuming the default threshold

RE: FM_BIG_REASON scoring

2008-06-21 Thread Robert - elists
> > Seems high to me, but needs to be put in the context of your threshold. > > -- > Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Threshold? Huh? You are joking right? The default SA scoring spam tagging threshold is half that... :-) - rh

Re: FM_BIG_REASON scoring

2008-06-21 Thread Sahil Tandon
Robert - elists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone think that > >10 FM_BIG_REASON Lot's of CAP words, BIG, REASON, BEST > > Is scored high or? Seems high to me, but needs to be put in the context of your threshold. -- Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

FM_BIG_REASON scoring

2008-06-21 Thread Robert - elists
Does anyone think that 10 FM_BIG_REASON Lot's of CAP words, BIG, REASON, BEST Is scored high or? - rh

Re: trusted_networks set in local.cf, but not according to sa-update

2008-06-21 Thread Sahil Tandon
Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags: > > > > [20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended > > that you configure trusted_networks manually > > This

Re: trusted_networks set in local.cf, but not according to sa-update

2008-06-21 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 21/06/2008 2:05 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: >>> I see the following when running sa-update with debug >>> flags: >>> >>> [20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; >>> it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks >>> manually

Re: trusted_networks set in local.cf, but not according to sa-update

2008-06-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Sat, June 21, 2008 20:05, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > Should? What good is that lint anyway if it can't be used to test local rules? spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint | less does it confirm ? Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098

Re: trusted_networks set in local.cf, but not according to sa-update

2008-06-21 Thread Jari Fredriksson
> On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> I see the following when running sa-update with debug >> flags: >> >> [20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; >> it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks >> manually > > This is expected and intentional. Your local cf

Re: trusted_host breaks pretty much every form of whitelist

2008-06-21 Thread Matthias Leisi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jo Rhett schrieb: | Why not allow me to say "I trust everything from this host" no matter what? Why would you run the mails through SpamAssassin if you trust everything from that host? A whitelist entry in the MTA would avoid wasting resources on t

Re: trusted_networks set in local.cf, but not according to sa-update

2008-06-21 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags: > > [20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended > that you configure trusted_networks manually This is expected and intentional. Your local cf files are not us

Re: trusted_networks set in local.cf, but not according to sa-update

2008-06-21 Thread Sahil Tandon
Nigel Frankcom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:10:53 -0400, Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags: > > > >[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended > >that you configure trust

Re: trusted_networks set in local.cf, but not according to sa-update

2008-06-21 Thread mouss
Nigel Frankcom wrote: On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:10:53 -0400, Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags: [20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks manually However:

Re: trusted_networks set in local.cf, but not according to sa-update

2008-06-21 Thread Nigel Frankcom
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:10:53 -0400, Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags: > >[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended >that you configure trusted_networks manually > >However: > ># grep trusted /usr/l