Re: whitelist_from_rcvd question

2008-06-09 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote: > "whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net" > > is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match. > Any ideas? > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from [75.145.201.209]

Spam without any rule hit?

2008-06-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
I just got this mail through, with only BAYES_99 hit: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=4.5] Very strange, I have a LOT of SARE and other rules, can't remember that this ever happened before. The filters seem to work otherwise, no other spam passed through

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:55 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Kelson wrote: > > Yeah, well, "Considered Harmful" essays are also considered harmful: > > http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html > > It was inevitable that the format would be used on itself. Of course. People should use more "on itself

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 09:45 -0400, Joseph Brennan wrote: > Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (to someone else): > > > And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. ACK. > I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. Please change to

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread mouss
Joseph Brennan wrote: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (to someone else): And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. so what? I don't know for you, but it takes me more time to

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (to someone else): > > >And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. On 09.06.08 09:45, Joseph Brennan wrote: > I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. > Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to

RE: whitelist_from_rcvd question

2008-06-09 Thread Jason Bertoch
> -Original Message- > On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote: > > > "whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net" > > > > is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't > match. > > Any ideas? > > Did you restart spamd

Error while sa-learning

2008-06-09 Thread Diego Pomatta
Hey list, I get lots of these errors while passing a mbox file to sa-learn for spam learning: Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0x72, immediately after start byte 0xf3) in transliteration (tr///) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm line 10

Re: whitelist_from_rcvd question

2008-06-09 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote: "whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net" is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match. Any ideas? Did you restart spamd? You might try just whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PRO

whitelist_from_rcvd question

2008-06-09 Thread Jason Bertoch
"whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net" is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match. Any ideas? Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from [75.145.201.209] (75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [7

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Bob Proulx
Kelson wrote: > Yeah, well, "Considered Harmful" essays are also considered harmful: > http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html It was inevitable that the format would be used on itself. > Let's remember that these essays are matters of individual opinion, not > statements of indisputable tru

Re: vbounce does not catch qmail bounces

2008-06-09 Thread Justin Mason
Alex Woick writes: > Just recently backscatter starts to hit me very bad, and I found out > that bounces generated by qmail are not detected by the vbounce plugin. > Here is such a backscatter mail: > > http://pastebin.com/m346c7979 : jm 5...; ./spamassassin -D -Lt < /home/jm/DL/m346c7979.txt

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Kelson
Matthias Leisi wrote: Reply-To considered harmful: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html And still considered harmful: http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html Yeah, well, "Considered Harmful" essays are also considered harmful: http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Matthias Leisi
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (to someone else): > >> And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. > > > I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. > Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list? Repl

Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Joseph Brennan
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (to someone else): And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list? It does have a