On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:23:33PM -0700, Robert - elists wrote:
> Ok
>
> Yellow then.
>
> What I am talking about is not greylisting google based upon those addresses
> and sending right to SA for scoring
Why would you care about the IP addresses? Just whitelist by *.google.com.
You shouldn't
Would some of you experts please take a look at a lint from one of our
servers from today and see if anything that should be changed / fixed /
addressed jumps out at you.
It was 41.2k so I didn't want to attach to the list
http://www.abbacomm.net/downloads/sa-lint-60208.txt
some things that jump
On Mon, June 2, 2008 22:29, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>> Ours works just fine across multiple MX server calling
>>> multiple spamd servers with a replicated mysql backend.
>> just a shame this does not work with amavisd :/
> Works fine. I use amavisd, but I have disabled it's SpamAssassin feature.
On Mon, June 2, 2008 21:20, Robert - elists wrote:
> Are most of you whitelisting these blocks ?
no whitelist here
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
> On Mon, June 2, 2008 18:57, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>
>> Use a mysql (or other network capable) database to store
>> user prefs.
>>
>> Ours works just fine across multiple MX server calling
>> multiple spamd servers with a replicated mysql backend.
>
> just a shame this does not work with amav
Ok
Yellow then.
What I am talking about is not greylisting google based upon those addresses
and sending right to SA for scoring
- rh
Robert - elists wrote:
Since they seem to have zillions of outbound mx machines
I did this in response to some email latency issues.
dig google.com txt
google.com. 31 IN TXT "v=spf1
include:_netblocks.google.com ~all"
then i
dig _netblocks.google.com txt
_netbloc
Since they seem to have zillions of outbound mx machines
I did this in response to some email latency issues.
dig google.com txt
google.com. 31 IN TXT "v=spf1
include:_netblocks.google.com ~all"
then i
dig _netblocks.google.com txt
_netblocks.google.com. 47 IN
On Mon, June 2, 2008 19:03, Henrik K wrote:
> Is this some sort of weird humor?
no i am just a dane :)
> I don't get it.. so you think it's better to work randomly on something
> for a few moments, after a possibly exhausting day at your real job?
from my own expirements yes, i sometimes get s
On Mon, June 2, 2008 18:57, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Use a mysql (or other network capable) database to store user prefs.
>
> Ours works just fine across multiple MX server calling multiple spamd
> servers with a replicated mysql backend.
just a shame this does not work with amavisd :/
Benny P
Hi to all,
i replaced my Sophos Antispam, with Amavis that use Mail::SpamAssassin
library.
The spam has reduced but i recive many spam emails in Cyrillic. In my
local.cf file i write:
ok_languages all
ok_locales all
How can i solve???
P.S. I use:
Mail::SpamAssassin 3.002004 on
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 06:52:26PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> (snip)
> > It's great how far SA is already, I give props to all the developers that
> > spend their free time on it. But just imagine what it could be, if for
> > example Justin would be paid to work on it 8 hours a day? :)
>
>
>
> It's great how far SA is already, I give props to all the developers that
> spend their free time on it. But just imagine what it could be, if for
> example Justin would be paid to work on it 8 hours a day? :)
Henrik,
Decent money isn't really that hard to come by overall...
The legal lan
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Hi.
I'm testing a setup with DirectAdmin boxes and a dedicated spamd box,
but so far I've found that spam_required is a global setting and you
can't seem to send user_prefs across since they live on the spamc server.
Is there a workaround for this at all? Can SA be tol
(snip)
> It's great how far SA is already, I give props to all the developers that
> spend their free time on it. But just imagine what it could be, if for
> example Justin would be paid to work on it 8 hours a day? :)
if he get paid he would get more tired of the work and we would get more bugs
Hi.
I'm testing a setup with DirectAdmin boxes and a dedicated spamd box,
but so far I've found that spam_required is a global setting and you
can't seem to send user_prefs across since they live on the spamc
server.
Is there a workaround for this at all? Can SA be told "Ok, user_prefs
l
Hi Eloise,
At 02:07 02-06-2008, Eloise Carlton wrote:
We are working with the sender and providing recommendations to secure
and monitor account users (such as using captcha to prevent bots from
registering and setting rate limits on the user level). Currently there
is no historical data on abuse
Henrik K wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:09:40AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
In the freemail plugin rather that listing all the domains in the plugin
I propose a network of DNS servers that list the names using rbldnsd. We
also have a central location where we maintain the list. That way
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:09:40AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> In the freemail plugin rather that listing all the domains in the plugin
> I propose a network of DNS servers that list the names using rbldnsd. We
> also have a central location where we maintain the list. That way the
> list can
In the freemail plugin rather that listing all the domains in the plugin
I propose a network of DNS servers that list the names using rbldnsd. We
also have a central location where we maintain the list. That way the
list can be updated faster and people have current information. I
suggest someo
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 05:33:10PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:29:44PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
> > Is there a bugreport for this? Or do youfind it better to whine and not try
> > to make it better?
>
> There are many bug reports, what good does it do if no
Hi,
i have a installation of spamassassin with postfix and amavis.
sa-update brings up an error:
"dns: query failed: 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org => no nameservers"
which is strange. DNS is working.
Here is the -D output:
---8<---
[3496] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[3496] dbg: logger: l
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:29:44PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > On 30.05.08 15:37, Larry Ludwig wrote:
> > > > IMHO regex setups are even more reliable we do this with our postfix
> > > > setup.
> > > >
> > > > For example:
> > > > /^c-.+-.+-.+-.+\..+\..+\.comcast\.net$/
> > On 30.05.08 15:37, Larry Ludwig wrote:
> > > IMHO regex setups are even more reliable we do this with our postfix
> > > setup.
> > >
> > > For example:
> > > /^c-.+-.+-.+-.+\..+\..+\.comcast\.net$/ REJECT
> > > dynamic ip address use isp for outgoing email - access.re
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:14:08PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:28:21PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 30.05.08 15:37, Larry Ludwig wrote:
> > > IMHO regex setups are even more reliable we do this with our postfix
> > > setup.
> > >
> > > For example:
> > > /^
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:28:21PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 30.05.08 15:37, Larry Ludwig wrote:
> > IMHO regex setups are even more reliable we do this with our postfix setup.
> >
> > For example:
> > /^c-.+-.+-.+-.+\..+\..+\.comcast\.net$/ REJECT
> > dyna
Hi Marc,
Am 2008-05-29 11:52:50, schrieb Marc Perkel:
> Here's my list in dnsrbl format. I only do rsync so far to paid
> subscribers or people who I'm trading with.
Missing Domains:
.freenet.de
.arcor.de
.arcor.com
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
On 30.05.08 09:04, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Name based DNS lists are more reliable because IP addresses can change.
We did not do much changes in out dialup and ADSL ranges, while I was
changing the naming scheme at least two times.
> The name based list covers all IP addresses where the FCrDNS reso
On 30.05.08 15:37, Larry Ludwig wrote:
> IMHO regex setups are even more reliable we do this with our postfix setup.
>
> For example:
> /^c-.+-.+-.+-.+\..+\..+\.comcast\.net$/ REJECT
> dynamic ip address use isp for outgoing email - access.regex
>
> I think is more reliab
Jo Rhett wrote:
And considering that SpamAssassin doesn't (in many configurations)
even know what recipient address a message has, it might actually be
easier than having the AWL ignore mail from self->self.
It has to, for the AWL to work.
No, it hasn't. The AWL only uses the *senders* add
We are working with the sender and providing recommendations to secure
and monitor account users (such as using captcha to prevent bots from
registering and setting rate limits on the user level). Currently there
is no historical data on abuse from this particular user, they have
flagged this accou
31 matches
Mail list logo
