Joseph Brennan wrote:
> Just a few months ago we did not get much spam at all from gmail.
> Something changed.
One change seems to be that Google's captcha has been broken.
http://www.google.com/search?q=google+captcha+broken
Bob
Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have checked the Received: headers several times and the messages are
>> coming from or . Maybe they should be listet in
>> .
>
> We have 200 complaints a day about spam that really comes from gmail.
> It's the biggest sou
I have checked the Received: headers several times and the messages are
coming from or . Maybe they should be listet in
.
We have 200 complaints a day about spam that really comes from gmail.
It's the biggest source of spam that gets through. Obviously it's also
a very big source of l
Greg Troxel wrote:
In my SA stats, the majority (+90%) of email inbound is classified as
rdns_none.
(I presume you are trying to make this server IPv6 only instead of dual
stack. When my machine had a globally routable v6 address I got some
mail over v6 and some over v4, but didn't used m
Larry Nedry wrote:
Of course. But how would I figure out what works best? How can I tell if
it is working poorly or very well?
Results.Customer/user complaints are always useful (if perhaps
not really desireable); customer/user *feedback* is critical on
anything bigger than a trivial p
Robin:
Of course we are not interested. This is a one-man shop with an annual
budget of about $50K. Why you put out the teaser on the Spamassassin User
list is totally beyond me.
Your "entry" level definition is very poorly defined. You'd get a lot more
small shops if you found a pricing struc
On May 23, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
1: Just read it as of when I said "your own users" I meant the users
of the host in question (the ones you mention above). More
specifically, the users using your host as a MSA (authenticated or
locally).
I don't trust "my users" in this c
In my SA stats, the majority (+90%) of email inbound is classified as
rdns_none.
I have a suspicion that this is due to the IPv6-IPv4 mapped address
being written into the headers when I am speaking to a non-native IPv6
MTA:
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (:::140.21
Hi Steve,
At 06:28 28-05-2008, Steve Bertrand wrote:
This may not be the appropriate list, but I'm hoping someone can help me.
It is the appropriate list.
I have an email server based on Matt Simerson's mail toaster
(http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/) that I've managed to
get IPv6 c
On May 28, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I'm using SA with SQL support under Amavid-new. My DBMS is MySQL.
I 'm preparing one another Antispam server and I ve installed the
latest
stable software available.
I ve dumped bayes DB (schema + data) from an already working
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Don Saklad wrote:
> a.
> What are a dozen or so of the most frequently used
> strings of characters in spam messages?... like rolex, maxgain, ...?
Common spam strings change constantly and are frequently obfuscated to
avoid simple string matches. There is a rule set called "S
Am 2008-05-25 23:44:33, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
> I have tried contacting postmaster@ but their auto-response is uselessly
> disingenuous. In it, they insist that spam is never sent from Google
> servers, and only from "miscreants" who forge @gmail.com addresses.
END OF RE
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Don Saklad wrote:
a.
What are a dozen or so of the most frequently used
strings of characters in spam messages?... like rolex, maxgain, ...?
Define "string." If you mean "word," then here are the 12 most common
words in the TREC 2005 corpus, with the number of times they
Hello,
I'm using SA with SQL support under Amavid-new. My DBMS is MySQL.
I 'm preparing one another Antispam server and I ve installed the latest
stable software available.
I ve dumped bayes DB (schema + data) from an already working machine and
I ve restore them on the new machine.
But when I
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Joseph Brennan wrote:
I was surprised that this rule...
uri CU_CN_LINK /http:..\w+\.cn\b/
matches not only this...
http://foobar.cn";>
but also this...
http://www.columbia.edu/foo.html";>KooXoo Buys Kuxun.cn
Domain
First, I did not rea
Joseph Brennan wrote:
Thanks, Mouss and Matt.
So a uri regexp will match a "http://"; that is not there. OK, well...
SA tries to check based on what MUAs do. if you write
"please visit www.example.com"
then so-called "modern" MUAs will highlight www.example.com and if you
bring your mou
Matt Kettler wrote:
Joseph Brennan wrote:
I was surprised that this rule...
uri CU_CN_LINK /http:..\w+\.cn\b/
matches not only this...
http://foobar.cn";>
but also this...
http://www.columbia.edu/foo.html";>KooXoo Buys Kuxun.cn
Domain
First, I did not realize that SpamAssassin'
Thanks, Mouss and Matt.
So a uri regexp will match a "http://"; that is not there. OK, well...
Joe Brennan
[12734] dbg: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
[12734] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined dependency
'SARE_XMAIL_SUSP2'
[12734] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined dependency
'X_AUTH_WARN_FAKED'
[12734] dbg: rules: meta
Hi,
I've got have a message that seems to tie up spamd forever.
I'm not sure if it's my setup or spamd itself. I run a very generic
stable release setup with bayes in mysql, although the hang up does not
appear to be bayes.
Would one of the developers like to contact me off list to get a co
Joseph Brennan wrote:
I was surprised that this rule...
uri CU_CN_LINK /http:..\w+\.cn\b/
matches not only this...
http://foobar.cn";>
but also this...
http://www.columbia.edu/foo.html";>KooXoo Buys Kuxun.cn
Domain
First, I did not realize that SpamAssassin's idea of "uri" inclu
Hi everyone,
This may not be the appropriate list, but I'm hoping someone can help me.
I have an email server based on Matt Simerson's mail toaster
(http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/) that I've managed to get
IPv6 compliant.
However, I'm having a very hard time determining exactly w
Joseph Brennan wrote:
I was surprised that this rule...
uri CU_CN_LINK /http:..\w+\.cn\b/
matches not only this...
http://foobar.cn";>
but also this...
http://www.columbia.edu/foo.html";>KooXoo Buys Kuxun.cn
Domain
First, I did not realize that SpamAssassin's idea of "uri" inclu
I was surprised that this rule...
uri CU_CN_LINK /http:..\w+\.cn\b/
matches not only this...
http://foobar.cn";>
but also this...
http://www.columbia.edu/foo.html";>KooXoo Buys Kuxun.cn Domain
First, I did not realize that SpamAssassin's idea of "uri" includes not
only the uri, but
a.
What are a dozen or so of the most frequently used
strings of characters in spam messages?... like rolex, maxgain, ...?
b.
Around the web where are they any such lists?...
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've been getting quite a lot of spam that's coming *directly* from
> >> Google,
> >> using Google servers and referencing blogspot.com (also a Google property)
> >> URLs. I've been submitting them to URIBL but naturally,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 00:04, Larry Nedry wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to calculate or experimentally find the sweet spot
> for bayes_expiry_max_db_size. Is there an ideal range? Or a maximum size?
> What happens if the size is too high?
what happen is when the size is to big the more ham/spam
27 matches
Mail list logo
