On Fri, May 16, 2008 00:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The distribution is FC3.
you need to remove all installed cpan modules, and let yum install all needed
perl modules that is needed, if yum miss a perl make it with cpan2rpm and
install that builded rpm with rpm
newer mix package managers !
On 12/05/2008 22:04, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 20:37, Geoff Soper wrote:
Can you suggest what I might do next? I'm not at all experienced in this
so I'm very grateful for your advice and patience!
need to knwo os distro, and why rpm updates not working :/
OK, I u
Michael Scheidell wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I understand your frustration in receiving unsolicited email. While
we investigate all reported violations against the Yahoo! Terms of
Service (TOS), in this particular case the message you received was
I am currently using SpamAssassin 3.2.4 on cygwin.
All is good, except DCC.
When I call dcc alone, the result is good:
$ dccproc -C -i sample-spam.txt
X-DCC-Rhyolite-Metrics: ns2 104; Body=many Fuz1=many Fuz2=many
repo
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 10:46 +1200, Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
> I run the update via a crontab entry (set when logged in as root) how do
> I specify who its done by and what the umask is?
Edit the crontab as the user you want it to be run. Alternatively, have
a look at 'man crontab'.
> spamassa
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 10:01 +1200, Kathryn Kleinschafer wrote:
> I run sa-update from the crontab daily which I believe should update the
> rules. (i'm relatively new to this so could have it completely wrong)
> The command I use in crontab is
> 00 01 * * * sa-update --allowplugins --channelfile
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 16:20 +, Jeff Aitken wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 05:35:52PM +0200, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
> > Do you see hits URIBL_BLACK hits in the incoming stream at all?
>
> Not sure exactly what you're asking here... but I included the entire
> X-Spam-Status and X-Spam-Rep
At 10:32 15-05-2008, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I understand your frustration in receiving unsolicited email. While
we investigate all reported violations against the Yahoo! Terms of
Service (TOS), in this particular case the message you received was
not
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I understand your frustration in receiving unsolicited email. While
we investigate all reported violations against the Yahoo! Terms of
Service (TOS), in this particular case the message you received was
not sent through the Yaho
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I understand your frustration in receiving unsolicited email. While we
investigate all reported violations against the Yahoo! Terms of Service
(TOS), in this particular case the message you received was not sent
through the Yahoo! Mail system.
Re
Yahoo.com says that they can't control email sent from third parties,
relayed through their mail servers.
"
Yahoo! has no control over activities outside its service, and therefore
we cannot take action
"
Sad, when for 12 years, the technology has existed to prevent third
party relaying like
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 05:35:52PM +0200, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
> No DNSBLs in the original result... This *may* be due to the BLs
> catching up, and the second run being done later. This specifically
> seems to be the case for Razor (which hit in both run, just differently)
> and likely for U
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:59:18AM -0400, Rick Duval wrote:
> 1) is there a complete list of variables available somewhere and
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus
is a good start, read the doc for get(). plugins may make other data
available, you'd have to look at them to find out.
> 2) IS
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 14:19 +, Jeff Aitken wrote:
> For example, a message that was just delivered to my inbox contained the
> following report from SA:
>
> X-Spam-Report:
> * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
> * [score: 1.]
>
I'm writing a custom plugin and using $pms->get('To') to get my to address
but it can be full of all kinds of junk. Multiple cc's, names of account as
well as their addresses and sometimes, for mailing lists, just the name of
the list!
1) is there a complete list of variables available somewhere
Hi,
just check Bug 5901, I had the same problems with googlemail bounces,
there is no header rule within 20_vbounce.cf matching on them. I found
the following, what I posted several days before:
+
After digging a little bit into this (I'm not a SA-expert), it showed
that the body
Hello,
Apologies if this is a FAQ or old news, but I did a bit of searching
yesterday and didn't find an answer to this one.
I'm using SA (3.2.4) site-wide on a FreeBSD-6.3 box in conjunction with
postfix, using procmail as the LDA. I'm using spamd/spamc, so the individual
spamc processes are ru
Ok, I think something is still wrong with my VBounce setup as a great % of backscatter doesn't get tagged with "ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE".Could I request from a few people on the list to send me a sample message attached as text which I can use "spamassassin -Lt < sample-vbounce.txt" on to see if I get t
Hi,
I have an Server programm sending mail to an PC. This PC reading mail
then forward it to user group.
Mails are reading correctly, but when it was forwarded, it is SPAMMED
with
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 4.1
How could i avoid it ?
Regards
Philippe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/15/2008 07:33 AM, ejml wrote:
| Hello Steven,
|
| I'm very interesting about how I can forward the message with the header
| rewritten to final user because I get only a warning spam arrival message.
| Is there some parameters that I'm forgettin
Hello Steven,
I'm very interesting about how I can forward the message with the header
rewritten to final user because I get only a warning spam arrival message.
Is there some parameters that I'm forgetting?.
Thanks.
Steven Stern wrote:
>
> Crespillo, Matias wrote:
>> I apologize in advance f
Aaron Bennett wrote:
Is anyone using these [VBounce] rules for spam detection?
We use them for detection ofbacscattered spam.
If so, how have you been scoring them?
We haven't changed the score.
What we do is check if ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE hits. If it hits a
mail, our mimedefang-filter then
22 matches
Mail list logo
