http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/PluginWritingTips
Gives plugin writing tips. But is there a beginners
plugin-writing-howto.
What are requisites. I am fairly comfortable writing in perl, will that
be enough. I want to call a web api for a third party scanner within SA
Thanks
Ram
mhildebr wrote:
Is there a way to have Spamassassin look for spoofed email addresses being
used as the sender's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but using a different
user name (Viagra instead of myname)? It seems like it would be simple to
check the user name and filter results from that. Thanks fo
Is there a way to have Spamassassin look for spoofed email addresses being
used as the sender's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but using a different
user name (Viagra instead of myname)? It seems like it would be simple to
check the user name and filter results from that. Thanks for any help.
--
V
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Robert_M=FCller?= writes:
> Hi all,
> as I'm facing raising amount of bounces on my mailserver in the last 2
> months, I tried to use the vbounce ruleset to identify the ones caused
> by UBE faking the sender address.
> This was generally successful, but surprisingly there are a
Hi all,
as I'm facing raising amount of bounces on my mailserver in the last 2
months, I tried to use the vbounce ruleset to identify the ones caused
by UBE faking the sender address.
This was generally successful, but surprisingly there are a lot of
UBE-bounces which are not recognized by vbou
On Tue, May 6, 2008 23:02, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> Yes, that's a possibility, but I can not do that. At least not in the near
> future. Any other ideas?
depends, but i like to know why spf can't work for you ?
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Tue, May 6, 2008 23:06, mouss wrote:
> you rely on the sender address, make sure to reject it in your smtpd
> (you don't want to give spammers an open road).
that was why i sugested spf
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
here is a part of the header from a mail I like to whitelist:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.958 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SPOOF_COM2COM=2.272,
SPOOF_COM2OTH=2.044, URIBL_BLACK=1.955, URIBL_PH_SURBL=1.787
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 22:00, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 21:32, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> add a spf record for this domain incl the subdomain :-)
Yes, that's a possibility, but I can not do that. At least not in the near
future. Any other ideas?
>
>
>
On Tue, May 6, 2008 21:32, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
add a spf record for this domain incl the subdomain :-)
then whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adjust the whitelist score so it not default -100 but enough to get the mail
through
def_whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whi
-- html code --
Hi!http://{MACCCLINK=3Dtestmaclink,3,http=
://67.228.184.50/links1.txt,www.easyaddedvivacecreation.com}/?srrjrrlt2qx=
fpm7DuzjjB82iEozsAEajsqbE">.
Sick and tired of disaster in bed? Bright up now! Leave
monotonous experience behind! urgent rescue is is not far!
Flood of feelings
Hello list,
here is a part of the header from a mail I like to whitelist:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.958 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SPOOF_COM2COM=2.272,
SPOOF_COM2OTH=2.044, URIBL_BLACK=1.955, URIBL_PH_SURBL=1.787,
URIBL_WS_SURB
Benny Pedersen wrote:
does users us smtp auth ?
Not the OP, but he *did* say this is from webmail. Presumably it's a
little hard to send mail from his webmail setup unless you're logged in...
(IIRC SA includes rules to look for Horde/IMP and Squirrelmail [at
least] Received: headers and co
What are people doing about joe jobs at this point? What custom rules, and or
pluggins? I use qmail with spamassassin and I'm seeing a increase in these over
the last few weeks on some of my domains.
Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Rubin Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mond
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 04:16:06PM +0200, polloxx wrote:
> Your Bayesian database has become dirty: too mush ham mails get a
> score of BAYES_99, certainly for one of your customer domains.
>
> Is there a way to sanitize the database without clear the whole thing?
> What are the best practices to k
On 06.05.08 16:16, polloxx wrote:
> Your Bayesian database has become dirty: too mush ham mails get a
> score of BAYES_99, certainly for one of your customer domains.
> Is there a way to sanitize the database without clear the whole thing?
do you keep all mail you've user to learn? If so, re-check
Hi,
Your Bayesian database has become dirty: too mush ham mails get a
score of BAYES_99, certainly for one of your customer domains.
Is there a way to sanitize the database without clear the whole thing?
What are the best practices to keep your Bayes database clean?
Thanks,
P.
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, but I can't for the life of me
spot it. Whenever the VBounce rules fire, I'm getting loads of
warnings of this ilk:
May 6 11:59:11 spamassistant.internal.thus.net spamd[24000]: no
meta_dependencies defined for __BOUNCE_AUTO_GENERATED at
/usr/perl5/site_perl
18 matches
Mail list logo
