Re: AWL Database Cleanup

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:32:23PM -0700, listmail wrote: > Does anyone know what kind of a database this is, and in particular, how to do > a cleanup that will remove unused records? The database is currently located > on a RAM drive, so space is important due to scarcity as well as the potential

Re: AWL Database Cleanup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/25/2008 06:57 PM, listmail wrote: | This looks like a good way of dealing with the AWL database, but I don't | see anything in the documentation - did you hack in the MySQL support | yourself, or is there an option that I missed? | | For the mom

Re: AWL Database Cleanup

listmail wrote: This looks like a good way of dealing with the AWL database, but I don't see anything in the documentation - did you hack in the MySQL support yourself, or is there an option that I missed? There's MySQL support built into SA for the AWL, as well as Bayes. If you try hard en

Re: AWL Database Cleanup

This looks like a good way of dealing with the AWL database, but I don't see anything in the documentation - did you hack in the MySQL support yourself, or is there an option that I missed? For the moment, I'm trying to find a simple solution, such as locating a tool that is capable of managing

Re: AWL Database Cleanup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/25/2008 06:32 PM, listmail wrote: | I noticed that the AWL database was getting rather large, so I used the | check_whitelist script to remove the stale entries. While this seems to have | removed a lot of entries from the database, it did not r

Re: Tests Question

William Taylor wrote: I recently started recieving complaints from some users about spam getting through. Upon looking at these messages they are scorring 0.0 from spamassassin. Not sure if something is jacked with my setup but running manually I see: [20309] dbg: check: tests= [20309] dbg: che

AWL Database Cleanup

I noticed that the AWL database was getting rather large, so I used the check_whitelist script to remove the stale entries. While this seems to have removed a lot of entries from the database, it did not reduce the database size. Does anyone know what kind of a database this is, and in particular

Re: Eureka!

DAve wrote: I found a possible reason for such a low hit rate with 3.2.4, uridnsbl_skip_domain. Holy smokes it has been killing me. We routinely get thousands of spam with URIs from geocities, mail.ru, blogspot, yahoo.com.br, netzero and more. I have had custom rules to score those over the t

Re: Extra long domain names rule?

Bookworm wrote: Randy Ramsdell wrote: [snip] I noticed you started a thread a few days ago with he exact same body and a changed subject. There are 10-20 replies to that thread so I am not sure why start a new exactly the thread a week later. My suggestion would be to read that thread. Bec

Tests Question

I recently started recieving complaints from some users about spam getting through. Upon looking at these messages they are scorring 0.0 from spamassassin. Not sure if something is jacked with my setup but running manually I see: [20309] dbg: check: tests= [20309] dbg: check: subtests=__CT,__CTE

how do I test spamc (plugins)

I just want to make sure that all the plugins I've supposedly enabled... including rbl and spf checking are working. What's the best way to see? -- Caleb Cushing my blog http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail

SM wrote: At 08:03 25-04-2008, John Rudd wrote: I believe he's calling SpamAssassin during the SMTP session, using mimedefang (a milter). Mailscanner doesn't let you do that (at least, not the last time I used it; it didn't have milter bindings). He's using Mailscanner as well. That package

Re: Extra long domain names rule?

Randy Ramsdell wrote: Bookworm wrote: I'm starting to see some new phishing/scam attempts. What I was thinking was that it might be worthwhile to add a rule to not so much check links, but count periods. I was going to put in the web address that I received as an example, but I think that's

Re: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail

At 08:03 25-04-2008, John Rudd wrote: I believe he's calling SpamAssassin during the SMTP session, using mimedefang (a milter). Mailscanner doesn't let you do that (at least, not the last time I used it; it didn't have milter bindings). He's using Mailscanner as well. That package includes

Eureka!

I found a possible reason for such a low hit rate with 3.2.4, uridnsbl_skip_domain. Holy smokes it has been killing me. We routinely get thousands of spam with URIs from geocities, mail.ru, blogspot, yahoo.com.br, netzero and more. I have had custom rules to score those over the threshold for

Re: Oh ohh. grey listing starting to fail

SM wrote: At 10:06 24-04-2008, Johnson, S wrote: Thanks for the input. I'm using: Postfix (I drop a ton of connections before the mail is even allowed in to my filters) - 6 RBLs - malformed email tests Spamassassin mimedefang razor2 dcc pyzor bayes lists Mailscanner If you have Mailscanne

Re: googlemail.com is this a free mail domain

On Apr 24, 2008, at 3:07 AM, ram wrote: I received a spam from googlemail.com I had assumed googlemail.com was not available for free domains, Am I wrong. Can I register a googlemail.com id http://www.google.com/a register your own google apps domain. now your mail goes in to googlemail.