Re: Need help with bobax rules

Are Henry's versions of these rules different to what Jack posted below, and if so, where can I find them? I'm still running SA 3.1.8 (unable to upgrade yet) so I wouldn't receive them if you've pushed them to the 3.2 sa-update. Cheers, Jeremy "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messa

RE: SPF and Hotmail

> -Original Message- > From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 April 2008 7:25 p.m. > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: SPF and Hotmail > > > On Wed, April 16, 2008 00:14, Michael Hutchinson wrote: > > >> domain: > >> def_whitelist_auth [EMAIL PROTECTED]

No Blacklist DNS List

I've created a public no blacklist DNS list of host names and IP addresses that should never be blacklisted. Some of them are from my white list, some from my yellow list, and others are just names and IPs that you don't want to be on a blacklist. Here's the link that describes how to use it.

Re: Returned mail spam

Richard Smits wrote: Hos safe is it to pump up the score for the ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE ? Is it bug free, so I can give it 5 or 10 points ? So you are wanting to mark ANY bounce, out of office, or mailing-list related email into your organization as spam? If you want to do that, then sure! :-)

Re: False Negatives

mouss wrote: Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: http://pastebin.com/m16055c85 Content analysis details: (9.6 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 1.5 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL

Re: False Negatives

Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: http://pastebin.com/m16055c85 Content analysis details: (9.6 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 1.5 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the

Re: Returned mail spam

Hos safe is it to pump up the score for the ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE ? Is it bug free, so I can give it 5 or 10 points ? Is anyone doing this ? (Maybe a step to far) Greetings Richard Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Graham Murray wrote: >>> If you publish a suitable SPF record then you will not r

Re: Error: incomplete data at .../DNS/RR.pm

On 09.04.2008 17:13 CE(S)T, Yves Goergen wrote: On 09.04.2008 12:41 CE(S)T, Justin Mason wrote: Yves Goergen writes: I keep getting this error since I installed SpamAssassin 3.2.4 on my Debian 3.1 Linux machine: Apr 9 11:52:20 mond spamd[2087]: Exception: incomplete data at /usr/local/lib/

Re: Upgrading

> Hi Mike, > > Thanks again for the advice. I've just managed to > miss-configure Postfix by restarting SpamAssasin :(( > Don't know why is sending spam from my account now, it's > like bouncing it with my address as "From". Probably will > do the Virtual Machine reharsal for the upgrade. > > Be

Re: Bayesian Learnig for SpamAssassin

JasonHirsh wrote: I have SA 3.17 running with amavisd-new, dovecot and Postfix 2.4.3 and Clama/v on freebsd 6.1 I am trying to"teach" sa using the following sa-learn /var/mail/vmail/example.com/user/.INBOX.spam/cur/ this is a maildir I have put around 175 spam messages in.. I got the followin

Bayesian Learnig for SpamAssassin

I have SA 3.17 running with amavisd-new, dovecot and Postfix 2.4.3 and Clama/v on freebsd 6.1 I am trying to"teach" sa using the following sa-learn /var/mail/vmail/example.com/user/.INBOX.spam/cur/ this is a maildir I have put around 175 spam messages in.. I got the following response Learned

Re: Need help with bobax rules

Justin Mason wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateKeyNotCrossCertified bingo! thanks. (wonder why do a rm on the sa-update-keys dir didn't fix that) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Main: 561-999-5000, Office: 561-939-7259 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation Winner 2008 Techno

Re: Need help with bobax rules

http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateKeyNotCrossCertified --j. Michael Scheidell writes: > > From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100 > > To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: > > Subject: Re: Need help with bobax rules > > > > > > for what

Re: Need help with bobax rules

On Thursday 17 April 2008 6:15 am, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100 > > To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: > > Subject: Re: Need help with bobax rules > > > > > > for what it's worth, I just pushed Henry's versio

Re: Need help with bobax rules

> From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100 > To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: > Subject: Re: Need help with bobax rules > > > for what it's worth, I just pushed Henry's version of Joe's rules into the > 3.2.x sa-updates. But did someone sign them

Re: two versions of spamd running?

Thanks for the reply! So if i run that i get $ ps xafu | grep spamd root 2146 0.0 0.0 4556 552 pts/1S+ 12:17 0:00 \_ grep spamd root 16388 0.0 1.8 44492 37708 ? Ss 10:30 0:04 /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m8 -H -r /var/run/spamd.pid nobody 584

Re: two versions of spamd running?

Ok great! Btw I'm running CentOS 4 so yes redhat Now If i run these commands how will I know which version of Spamd was stoped? I want to keep the version of Spamassasin thats running along with mailscanner. Which is were i think the conflict is in. Mailscanner is running its own version and t

how to use conditional cf rules

I have several SA servers all of them share the same cf files There are some particular custom rules , I want to run only on some servers One alternative is I put them in a different file and put the cf file only on the servers that require them But I dont want to have different cf files on diff

Re: Returned mail spam

> Graham Murray wrote: > >If you publish a suitable SPF record then you will not receive any > >backscatter (which is the subject of this thread) from sites which > >correctly implement SPF checking. On 16.04.08 18:06, mouss wrote: > without spf, you will not receive any backscatter from sites whi