On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:23:17PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
>> Hi so again some undertsanding issue, i just got a mail from some gmail
>> user. It got 5.1 points:
>>
>> 1.6 TVD_RCVD_IPTVD_RCVD_IP
>> 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXYRBL: NJABL: sender is an
Thanks - that worked!!
At 07:08 PM 3/30/2008, Matt Kettler wrote:
Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Matt:
Thanks for answering. However neither 'add_header all Report_REPORT_' or
'add_header all' seem to be valid SA commands per 'lint'
You're missing a space between "Report" and "_REPORT_", which appa
i have site-wide config, as I only filter the mail and pass it on to
exchange- no ind users setup
I run sa-learn --spam --showdots
J
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 3/30/2008 21:11
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: users@spamassas
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 14:51 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Piotr Zalewa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, 31 March 2008 2:26 p.m.
> > To: SpamAssassin
> > Subject: RE: Failed to check the emails
> > I've run the
> > spamassassin -D --lint > spam
> -Original Message-
> From: Piotr Zalewa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 31 March 2008 2:26 p.m.
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: RE: Failed to check the emails
>
> Thanks Michael.
>
> I've run the
> spamassassin -D --lint > spamassassin_lint 2>&
>
> I can't find anything suspic
Hi
I hate when it happened (well not 100% hate). I've done few things and
it's being checked now. No idea how anyway - probably changed something
an hour ago or so and just restarted recently, but it did the job.
Thanks for help, I'm sure there will be more issues - it's interesting
subject
Piot
Thanks Michael.
I've run the
spamassassin -D --lint > spamassassin_lint 2>&
I can't find anything suspicious there - but I'm not the master either.
I think it's rather qmail-scanner configuration problem ... I'll paste
here parts which I think are important ... If it's not helpful I can
attach t
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
i've trained SA with about 12000 messages that have made it through the
filters , i last trained 1 week ago
Any chance you're training a different database than SA uses at delivery
time?
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 12:38 +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> Piotr Zalewa wrote:
> > But some are coming not being checked ...
> > I can find this in the header of the message:
> >
> > with qmail-scanner-2.01st (clamdscan: 0.91.2/6473. spamassassin: 3.2.1.
> > perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:0(140.211.11.2)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 31 March 2008 12:38 p.m.
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: Re: Failed to check the emails
>
> Piotr Zalewa wrote:
> > But some are coming not being checked ...
> > I can find this in the header of the message:
>
Piotr Zalewa wrote:
But some are coming not being checked ...
I can find this in the header of the message:
with qmail-scanner-2.01st (clamdscan: 0.91.2/6473. spamassassin: 3.2.1.
perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:0(140.211.11.2):SA:0(?/?):. Processed in
3.031013 secs); 30 Mar 2008 15:34:59 -
X-S
i've trained SA with about 12000 messages that have made it through the
filters , i last trained 1 week ago
Jean-Paul
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 3/30/2008 19:22
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Su
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
Hi so again some undertsanding issue,
i just got a mail from some gmail user. It got 5.1 points:
1.6 TVD_RCVD_IPTVD_RCVD_IP
1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXYRBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy
[201.20.219.97 listed in combined.nj
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Why does this hit on the most OBVIOUS messages?
Its almost an oxymoron
Well, it's your responsibility to train your bayes database. It's
hitting BAYES_00 because it closely matches your nonspam training.
You can start correcting it by using sa-learn --spam on so
Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Matt:
Thanks for answering. However neither 'add_header all Report_REPORT_'
or 'add_header all' seem to be valid SA commands per 'lint'
You're missing a space between "Report" and "_REPORT_", which apparently
I missed in my post.
My bad, it should be:
add_header all Re
Hi
On one server I have qmail with spamassassin.
Most of the emails are coming checked by spamassassin.
But some are coming not being checked ...
I can find this in the header of the message:
with qmail-scanner-2.01st (clamdscan: 0.91.2/6473. spamassassin: 3.2.1.
perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:0(14
Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
Hi so again some undertsanding issue,
i just got a mail from some gmail user.
It got 5.1 points:
1.6 TVD_RCVD_IPTVD_RCVD_IP
1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXYRBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy
[201.20.219.97 listed in combine
I am trying to get SA installed on a mac osx 10.3.9 machine. I have
installed all the prereq, and some optional req. Seems when i used cpan or
try downloaded and installing locally i have been getting some errors. I
will post the errors i am receiving and if anyone could help it would be
greatl
Hi Matt:
Thanks for answering. However neither 'add_header all Report_REPORT_' or
'add_header all' seem to be valid SA commands per 'lint'
[4716] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "all" is not valid
for "add_header", skipping: add_header all
[27883] warn: config: SpamAssass
Hi,
Thanks for all of the helpful tips.
1) I process about 30,000 e-mails a day, so I am good there.
2) The "dig" trick does indeed return a positive response.
3) It looks like I borked something in my sendmail.cf, because when I
send a test message to see if Zen is working, here is what I ge
I have tried to upgrade spamassassin twice with no avail. Current
version running is 3.2.3 on Solaris 8
cpan> install Mail::SpamAssassin
Running install for module Mail::SpamAssassin
Running make for J/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4.tar.gz
Is already unwrapped into directory
/usr/local/cpan/b
Hi so again some undertsanding issue,
i just got a mail from some gmail user. It got 5.1 points:
1.6 TVD_RCVD_IPTVD_RCVD_IP
1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXYRBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy
[201.20.219.97 listed in combined.njabl.org]
0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP
I updated from debian to arch and figured my exact same sa configuration
doesn't test uribl anymore. yes spamhaus works fine, so no i dont have a -L
switch.
any clues? i did sa-update once but dunno if that had any effect at all.
--
best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Arvid Ephraim Picciani
Hi All,
A user received the spam below. The scoring on it seems very low. Does
it score consistently for others? If not, what rules is it tagging?
Any help gratefully received.
>Received: by blue-canoe.org.uk (MTSPro MTSAgent 1.60.20) ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008
>07:06:43 -
>for
>X-Spam-RBLRepo
On Sunday 30 March 2008 08:08:19 mstarcom wrote:
> I am currently on a shared host. When I enable spamassassin's spam folder
> in Cpanel, all the spam for the entire domain is lumped into one common
> folder.
>
> I will soon be moving to a VPS. Will it be possible to configure
> spamassassin so th
peter pilsl wrote:
Our mailserver is behind a NAT-firewall (port 25 is passed through to
the internal mailserver) and I ran into the ALL_TRUSTED-problem. I
looked up the FAQ and set
trusted_networks 127.0.0.1 (which actually gives me a warning that
127.0.0.1 is already part of trusted_net
26 matches
Mail list logo
