Re: FreeMail plugin

2008-03-23 Thread Tarak Ranjan
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 15:51 +0200, Henrik K wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 06:41:26PM +0530, Tarak Ranjan wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 12:28 +, Justin Mason wrote: > > > Henrik K writes: > > > > I updated my FreeMail plugin with a big list of domains > > > > (http://www.rhyolite.com

Re: SA-UPDATE How often new updates?

2008-03-23 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 08:36:19AM +0800, Sn!per wrote: > But since early Feb, I didn't see any update taking place. I have these in > /usr/share/spamassassin: sa-update doesn't write to /usr/share/spamassassin so you're going to be waiting a long time. :) -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "I thoug

Re: SA-UPDATE How often new updates?

2008-03-23 Thread Sn!per
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > John Fleming wrote: > > I hadn't paid attention for awhile, and now I'm noticing that > > SA-Update exited with code 1 every time it ran (daily) for the last > > several weeks at least that I've been paying attention again. > > Normal? Is there a li

Re: Am confused with mail header

2008-03-23 Thread Sn!per
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sn!per wrote: > > Hi all, > > Am using SA version 3.2.4 . So far working great. > > > > I am comparing the headers on two of my mails. The first mail is NOT a > spam, and X-Spam-Status is like so: > > > > No, score=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HE

Re: Logging

2008-03-23 Thread Skip
Matt Kettler wrote: Skip wrote: One more dumb question (and this really is more of a linux question than a SA question), but if I start spamd -d from a console, and then quit that console, won't the daemon quit too? No, that's what makes it a daemon.. it detaches from the console completely,

Re: Logging

2008-03-23 Thread Matt Kettler
Skip wrote: One more dumb question (and this really is more of a linux question than a SA question), but if I start spamd -d from a console, and then quit that console, won't the daemon quit too? No, that's what makes it a daemon.. it detaches from the console completely, thus remains active ev

Re: Logging

2008-03-23 Thread Skip
One more dumb question (and this really is more of a linux question than a SA question), but if I start spamd -d from a console, and then quit that console, won't the daemon quit too? I think the only other option is to "run it from cron" to get it out of a console, but that's a real kludge an

Re: SA-UPDATE How often new updates?

2008-03-23 Thread Justin Mason
Matt Kettler writes: > John Fleming wrote: > > I hadn't paid attention for awhile, and now I'm noticing that > > SA-Update exited with code 1 every time it ran (daily) for the last > > several weeks at least that I've been paying attention again. > > Normal? Is there a list of when updates ha

Re: uri obfuscation

2008-03-23 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
On Sunday 23 March 2008 14:10:18 The Doctor wrote: > Where should this be added? to your custom rules. i suggest editing local.cf and adding the following line: include /etc/spamassassin/myrules then make that directory and put your custom rules in it (one file is one rule) you can also put all ru

Re: uri obfuscation

2008-03-23 Thread The Doctor
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 09:26:39PM -0400, Joseph Brennan wrote: > >> thats a dynamic ip from telecomitalia. i'm getting lots of spam from >> there but the ips are in no dynamic list. is there a more complete list >> of dynamic hosts? > > We are currently doing this: > > > # Telecomitalia. ISP wi

Re: uri obfuscation

2008-03-23 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
On Sunday 23 March 2008 02:26:39 Joseph Brennan wrote: > > thats a dynamic ip from telecomitalia. i'm getting lots of spam from > > there but the ips are in no dynamic list. is there a more complete list > > of dynamic hosts? > > We are currently doing this: http://sarah.ibcsolutions.de/~aep/sa/7

Re: Forged Received headers and Message-Ids (was: Re: uri obfuscation)

2008-03-23 Thread Arvid Ephraim Picciani
On Saturday 22 March 2008 21:31:13 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 19:31 +0100, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote: > > > http://rafb.net/p/S95P6c12.html > > Yes, this is a spam alright. The Message-Id alone tells so. See my rule > KB_RATWARE_MSGID in bug 5830 [1]. > [1] https://issues