Site-wide is what i'm trying to setup, I guess i need to do some more
googling :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-learn-question-tp16019261p16020836.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hungry Snail wrote:
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
Did you run it as the same user as the sa-learn?
You might want to try the sa-learn again with -D to see what the
debugging has to say.
Bah, it works fine if I issue the command via the ssh.
sa-learn --spam --configpath=/etc/mail/spamassa
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
> Did you run it as the same user as the sa-learn?
> You might want to try the sa-learn again with -D to see what the
> debugging has to say.
>
Bah, it works fine if I issue the command via the ssh.
sa-learn --spam --configpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots
htt
Hungry Snail wrote:
Hungry Snail wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am using spam/notspam via Squirrelmail
If I mark an email as spam squirrelmail send this command.
COMMAND USED TO REPORT: /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam
--configpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots <
/var/spool/squirrelmail/attach//sb_tmp_174_
Hungry Snail wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am using spam/notspam via Squirrelmail
>
> If I mark an email as spam squirrelmail send this command.
> COMMAND USED TO REPORT: /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam
> --configpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots <
> /var/spool/squirrelmail/attach//sb_tmp_174_12053
Hungry Snail wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am using spam/notspam via Squirrelmail
If I mark an email as spam squirrelmail send this command.
COMMAND USED TO REPORT: /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam
--configpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots <
/var/spool/squirrelmail/attach//sb_tmp_174_1205370641
The result I
Hi Guys,
I am using spam/notspam via Squirrelmail
If I mark an email as spam squirrelmail send this command.
COMMAND USED TO REPORT: /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam
--configpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots <
/var/spool/squirrelmail/attach//sb_tmp_174_1205370641
The result I get is..
[0] => Learn
Quick question, I hope. I just got things set up on one of my servers to
run sa-update. I'm using the channelfile:
updates.spamassassin.org
72_sare_redirect_post3.0.0.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
70_sare_evilnum0.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.n
ItsMikeE wrote:
> I have been running this rule for a day now, and am trapping
> the spams with rules 1 and 2.
I too just started running these rules, but noticed there were a lot
more NICE_GIRL_02's than NICE_GIRL_01's being hit (about twice as many
of the former).
I think you need to change:
Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:16:32AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:23:14AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
You can use spamassassin and clamav with or without Amavis, but to
check the message, you must make a system wide c
Well here is the actual headers:
Mar 11 13:48:20 x1mail spamd[6116]: spamd: result: Y 22 -
DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24,
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,
URIBL_SC_SURBL scantime=17.6,size=3023,user=root,uid=501,required_score=3.0,
rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.
Doug Poulin wrote:
Well here is the actual headers:
Mar 11 13:48:20 x1mail spamd[6116]: spamd: result: Y 22 -
DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24,
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,
URIBL_SC_SURBL
scantime=17.6,size=3023,user=root,uid=501,required_score=3.0,
rhost
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:14 AM
> To: dougp23
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: new version always trusts 127.0.0.1
>
> dougp23 wrote:
> > Hi. Running SA 3.1.8
> >
> > Would like to move to a n
On 12.03.08 16:30, R.Smits wrote:
> Forget it
>
> I have just discovered DCC .
> Looks a lot better :-)
they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three)
> > Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
> >
> > Is anyone using pyzor ?
--
Matus U
On 12.03.08 10:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Even though it did not meet SA's threshold, the e-mails are still going to
> users Spam Box instead of their inbox. Maybe I should have made that more
> clear , sorry for the confusion.
it's not SA issue then. SA only classifies mail, it's something
Forget it
I have just discovered DCC .
Looks a lot better :-)
Sorry i've asked.
Greetings...
R.Smits wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
>
> Is anyone using pyzor ?
>
> We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks o
Hello,
Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
Is anyone using pyzor ?
We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks old...
(last version from 2002)
Greetings... Richard Smits
Technical University Delft
-Original Message-
From: Mike Fahey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:14 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: spam increase
Has anyone else noticed a major increase in spam over the past two days?
I'm seen a 40% increase.
I've gone from blocking 60
dougp23 wrote:
Hi. Running SA 3.1.8
Would like to move to a newer version for a few reasons...
Anyways the 3.2.3 version looks compelling, but I use a mailserver called
Scalix. It uses Sendmail as its engine. But each X-Spam header shows this:
rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=34757,
Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:23:14AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
You can use spamassassin and clamav with or without Amavis, but to check
the message, you must make a system wide change that will affect every
message. Bypassing file size limits with any of those setups might
I have, most of from countries I block to a spam trap folder for bayes.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Fahey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:14 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: spam increase
>
>
> Has anyone else noticed a major increase i
Has anyone else noticed a major increase in spam over the past two days?
I'm seen a 40% increase.
At 03:57 12-03-2008, Steve Radich wrote:
I'm unclear if this is RFC compliant or not, the specs DO say in Section
3.8.2 "environments may not conform eactly to this specification" - see
other RFC references..
SpamAssassin doesn't verify RFC compliance.
The following line causes UNPARSEABLE_RE
Drew Burchett writes:
> I've noticed a new trend in spam on my mail server that is getting by
> SpamAssassin. The spammer is creating his message and then attach a
> couple of garbage PDFs to the email. These PDFs make it too large for
> SpamAssassin to scan the message, so it gets by the system
YES MAN! Thanks a lot!!! That was my mistake. I'm wondering why I
haven't found that comment on that page...
But... ymmd! Thank you :-)
am 12.03.2008 15:32 schrieb Jared Hall:
Sebastian Hoffmann wrote:
Hi!
I'm using the spamass-milter 0.3.1. I searched in the milter's
man-page for a command
John ,
Even though it did not meet SA's threshold, the e-mails are still going to
users Spam Box instead of their inbox. Maybe I should have made that more
clear , sorry for the confusion.
Jeremy Davila
Systems Administrator
Direct: 646-205-2136
The LanguageWorks, Inc.
1123 Broadway, Suite
Sebastian Hoffmann wrote:
Hi!
I'm using the spamass-milter 0.3.1. I searched in the milter's
man-page for a command to specify the timeout but didn't find
anything. I also had a look at the options that are possible to set
when executing the ./configure.sh before starting "make" and "make
in
Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:48:37AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Drew Burchett wrote:
I've noticed a new trend in spam on my mail server that is getting by
SpamAssassin. The spammer is creating his message and then attach a
couple of garbage PDFs to the email. These PDF
On Mon, March 10, 2008 14:11, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf have following directives:
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
remove this line in local.cf
find the plugin in one of the *.pre files and enable the plugin from there
should fix the problem
Benny
Peter Kingsbury wrote:
Hello,
Since installing SpamAssassin on my company’s Exchange server, I
wanted to make kludging through potential spam/ham messages faster
than using the slow remote desktop interface that is in place.
I wrote a program which allows an admin to quickly scan SA-filtere
On Sun, March 9, 2008 19:01, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> I guess I'm still not being clear. There are 120K emails a day coming
> to INVALID EMAIL ADDRESSES THAT NEVER EXISTED.
this is a ERROR IN YOUR DUMP SENDMAIL :=)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] nobody
FIX IT !
Benny Pede
Drew Burchett wrote:
I've noticed a new trend in spam on my mail server that is getting by
SpamAssassin. The spammer is creating his message and then attach a
couple of garbage PDFs to the email. These PDFs make it too large for
SpamAssassin to scan the message, so it gets by the system. I hav
I've noticed a new trend in spam on my mail server that is getting by
SpamAssassin. The spammer is creating his message and then attach a
couple of garbage PDFs to the email. These PDFs make it too large for
SpamAssassin to scan the message, so it gets by the system. I have
tried turning up the
Hi. Running SA 3.1.8
Would like to move to a newer version for a few reasons...
Anyways the 3.2.3 version looks compelling, but I use a mailserver called
Scalix. It uses Sendmail as its engine. But each X-Spam header shows this:
rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=34757,
Which makes me th
mouss wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.03.08 12:16, Jay Langley wrote:
Below I have offered the content of my spam score report generated by
Spam Assassin. We are Kintera subscribers. Problem is I don't know
how to make changes in the text that will result in a better score.
Hi!
I'm using the spamass-milter 0.3.1. I searched in the milter's man-page
for a command to specify the timeout but didn't find anything. I also
had a look at the options that are possible to set when executing the
./configure.sh before starting "make" and "make install" but... nothing
to se
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.03.08 12:16, Jay Langley wrote:
Below I have offered the content of my spam score report generated by
Spam Assassin. We are Kintera subscribers. Problem is I don't know
how to make changes in the text that will result in a better score.
you shoul
Botnet just pushed it over for is :-
Content analysis details: (8.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
3.0 URIBL_BLACKContains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
I'm unclear if this is RFC compliant or not, the specs DO say in Section
3.8.2 "environments may not conform eactly to this specification" - see
other RFC references..
The following line causes UNPARSEABLE_RELAY:
Received: from host1.internal (host1.internal) by host2.internal
(63.218.155.52) wit
On 11.03.08 12:16, Jay Langley wrote:
> Below I have offered the content of my spam score report generated by
> Spam Assassin. We are Kintera subscribers. Problem is I don't know
> how to make changes in the text that will result in a better score.
you should turn on network rules, allow plugi
I'm seeing a lot of image spam, but the images are not individually spammy.
There are 5 tall, skinny images that together sell colon cleansing, or some
such.
Any ideas?
Spam scores quite low, so far.
Dan
Sample: http://www.visioncomm.net/5image.txt
Report:
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No,
Well Justin, actually I have. I just don't understand the sa-compile thing
or where to replace spamassassin with spamc, since I cannot find the phrase
'spamassassin' in my /etc/init.d/spamassassin or in
/etc/sysconfig/mail/spamassassin (also in the qmail/smtpd's run file). I do
have used dnscache
Sg schrieb:
Hi
I am using SA 3.1.7 in MS Exchange Server. Yesterday 80,000 spam
messages cloggin the system. Can anyone tell me, why suddenly getting lot of
spam mails. we need to update the SA or update the rules.. Please tell me
how to update SA in windows?
btw:
What are your experiences
Greetings,
Below I have offered the content of my spam score report generated by
Spam Assassin. We are Kintera subscribers. Problem is I don't know
how to make changes in the text that will result in a better score.
Could you send me someplace to learn what different scores mean and how
to
have you read the FAQ?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FasterPerformance
--j.
FC Mario Patty writes:
> Guys,
>
> I updated my spamassassin to SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 that running on
> Perl version 5.8.5 in a hope that spamd wouldn't kill my CPU again. Once
> in less-or-more an hour user
On my spamassissin server i got the following error what is
actually went wrong here !!
Wed Mar 12 14:58:28 2008 [3130] error: syswrite() to parent failed: Broken
pipe at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/
On 11.03.08 17:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here is the full header. But also the local.cf has around 12000 entries,
> is that a problem.
WHAT? 12000 entries? What the hell are you doing with that?
> Received: from smtp1.citigroup.com ([199.67.179.116]
> helo=mail.citigroup.com)
>
you should also local DCC plugin before this directives, try to place
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
before any dcc commands in local.cf file
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:40:19AM +0530, Tarak Ranjan wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have installed dcc-1.3.85 , and my local.cf file is
> use_dcc 1
Have you unchecked the line below in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre? I
don't use DCC so I don't bother change mine, but I've read somewhere in the
mlist repository saying that. :)
# DCC - perform DCC message checks.
#
# DCC is disabled here because it is not open source. See the DCC
# licen
Peter Kingsbury schrieb:
Hello,
Since installing SpamAssassin on my company's Exchange server, I wanted
to make kludging through potential spam/ham messages faster than using
the slow remote desktop interface that is in place.
I wrote a program which allows an admin to quickly scan SA-
Sg schrieb:
Hi
I am using SA 3.1.7 in MS Exchange Server. Yesterday 80,000 spam
messages cloggin the system. Can anyone tell me, why suddenly getting lot of
spam mails. we need to update the SA or update the rules.. Please tell me
how to update SA in windows?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamass
51 matches
Mail list logo
