On Tuesday 12 February 2008, John Hardin wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 10 February 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>>> Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
> to sa-learn -
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 21:34 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
> > > to
> > > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
> >
> > Dunno if there are limitati
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:04:28PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Guilty, its all in Mail dir format.
--dir ?
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"There are all of these warnings and incantations and unnatural rituals
and everything's veiled in this threat of "you mess with the mayo,
the mayo mess wit
Hello,
I'm setting up a gateway spamfilter mailserver. And I like to be able to give
with spamc the path to the user_prefs file for the right domain. So the user
does not exists, so I can not use the -U option.
I have read this patch
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4405 a
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 04:25 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> KB> User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing*
> KB> special about SA version numbers.
> Is too or else there wouldn't be a user_prefs file [...]
Then stick to the user_prefs file.
You do realize there is
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
to sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
Dunno if there ar
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>> > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed
>> > to sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
>>
>> Dunno if there are limitations -- however, your
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, The Doctor wrote:
Hmm!! Slight problem!
I indicated a whtielist_from in the universal configuration file
and still there is {spam?} label.
What should I be fixing?
Your request for help.
Please post the whitelist command you added to the configuration file, the
name of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:26 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: upgrading is just like installing
KB> User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is
*nothing*
KB> special about SA
Hmm!! Slight problem!
I indicated a whtielist_from in the universal configuration file
and still there is {spam?} label.
What should I be fixing?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! On Mar
KB> User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing*
KB> special about SA version numbers.
Is too or else there wouldn't be a user_prefs file or instructions for
installing non-root. And SA version numbers & aliases often need explaining,
just like Debian package version numb
Nope. I took a look at my sent box on the Kolab server. The message
subject was normal when it left my mailbox. I had hit the reply button
for a previous message.
I was wondering what could be wrong with my e-mail until others reported
that it came through fine to them. I would hate to be a
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:44:58AM -0500, Rob McEwen wrote:
> On 12.02.08 13:55, Arthur Dent wrote:
>> I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be getting
>> bombarded with Russian spam. It currently outweighs all other spam by
>> about 100:1
> Arthur,
>
> First, make sure that
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:33:47AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Arthur Dent wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't fully understand just how Bayes
>> works.
>>
>> I dutifully feed all the spam (and ham) I get into sa-learn and generally
>> Bayes works pretty well.
>>
>>
Hi Michelle,
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Users !
>
Its possible that, if the To: header line contained a sentence, that
Postfix address rewriting will add "@example.com" to every word, fail to
find these mailboxes and bounce the message as a result.
However, I've found another way to upset Po
Hello Martin,
This error is simpel...
If you for example in mutt write a message and hit for new message
you will ask for the "To:" address enter it or use the addressbook and
hit .
Normaly you will be ask for the "Subject:" and enter it...
Now if you do not keep attention and you write somet
Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed to
> > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed?
>
> Dunno if there are limitations -- however, your 7k messages should be
> perfectly fine. Just ran a test
Am 2008-02-08 01:49:52, schrieb Gene Heskett:
> So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed to
> sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed? I vaguely recall
> feeding it my corpus of another folder it was having trouble with a year ago,
> the linux-usb lis
On 12.02.08 13:55, Arthur Dent wrote:
I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be getting
bombarded with Russian spam. It currently outweighs all other spam by
about 100:1
Arthur,
First, make sure that you are blocking all mail sent to unknown users
(i.e., turn catch-all o
On 12.02.08 13:55, Arthur Dent wrote:
> Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't fully understand just how Bayes
> works.
>
> I dutifully feed all the spam (and ham) I get into sa-learn and generally
> Bayes works pretty well.
>
> I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be g
Arthur Dent wrote:
Hello All,
Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't fully understand just how Bayes
works.
I dutifully feed all the spam (and ham) I get into sa-learn and generally
Bayes works pretty well.
I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be getting
bombarded wi
Hello All,
Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't fully understand just how Bayes
works.
I dutifully feed all the spam (and ham) I get into sa-learn and generally
Bayes works pretty well.
I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be getting
bombarded with Russian spam. It c
22 matches
Mail list logo
