Hi,
I'm a student at Rutgers University. I've been running SA on my own
mailserver (handling 3 users) for a few years now. I recently came into
some new hardware, and replaced the old mailserver with a new one
running Solaris 10. I'm using SpamAssassin 3.02 in the blastwave.org
package. I'm using
Quoting Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Per Jessen writes:
Check this out
http://jessen.ch/files/spam55.txt
It's a typical spam-email with a single gif advertising drugs. The gif
is loaded from a website which is listed by uribl.com.
The emails has hrefs to the following '.com' domai
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
I just had this message get through :-
and it only scored 5.6. These are the rules it hit :-
1.23 ADVANCE_FEE_2
0.00 BAYES_50
0.72 SARE_URGBIZ Contains urgent matter
-0.00 SPF_PASS
2.08 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
1.58 URG_BIZ
Looks like you might want to do some
Mitchell Hudson wrote:
I did actually pull out the number of tokens and I have quite a few in
there:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 23930 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 8304 0 non-token data: nha
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:10:39PM -0600, Matt wrote:
> Does anyone see anything wrong with these scores? The RDNS_DYNAMIC
> worries me a bit since I know a few email servers hosted on dynamic
> looking reverse DNS's.
Well, first, the scores are really aggressive. Generally speaking, you don't
w
I have added the following to the local.cf to decrease the spam that
gets through.
score RCVD_IN_PBL 3
score RCVD_IN_XBL 5
score RDNS_NONE 5
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 3
score SPF_FAIL 10
score SPF_SOFTFAIL 5
score SPF_NEUTRAL 2
score RDNS_DYNAMIC 3
Does anyone see anything wrong with these scores?
Joseph Brennan wrote:
I looked at our spam reports (spam that was not rejected). It looks to
me like the biggest target to go for is mail supposedly from The Bat!
direct to your MX. Most of the supposed The Bat! spam matches, and it
is very low scoring.
Yes - I just saw that too - like Outl
Hi,
I just had this message get through :-
Subject: CONTACT GLOBAL COMPANY FOR YOUR $950,000.00
My Dear Good Friend,
I have Paid the fee for your Cheque Draft. But the manager of
Eko Bank Benin told me that before the check will get to you
that it will expire. So I told him to cash the $950,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:53:50AM -0600, Mitchell Hudson wrote:
> So I'm not worried about not having any training. And the spamassassin
> -D bayes
> message.txt, but in any case I let it run for about 30 minutes and it
> didn't return any data, which seemed very strange.
Of course, it was wa
I did actually pull out the number of tokens and I have quite a few in
there:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 23930 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 8304 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 2
Per Jessen writes:
> Check this out
>
> http://jessen.ch/files/spam55.txt
>
> It's a typical spam-email with a single gif advertising drugs. The gif
> is loaded from a website which is listed by uribl.com.
>
> The emails has hrefs to the following '.com' domains:
>
> MUNGEDjuxl.com - cont
Check this out
http://jessen.ch/files/spam55.txt
It's a typical spam-email with a single gif advertising drugs. The gif
is loaded from a website which is listed by uribl.com.
The emails has hrefs to the following '.com' domains:
juxl.com - contents named 'NAMESRENTER.COM'
nkhs.com - some o
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 27.01.08 15:06, Sevrin Robstad wrote:
>> I have used spamassassin over a year on my mail server, using James as
>> pop/smtp and a homewritten mailet to connect to spamd through tcp.
>> Yesterday I suddenly discovered load average peaks over 100 (!!!) on the
Hard Coder wrote:
Hello,
I decided to benchmark the accuracy of spamassassin. Is there anything special
I should take into consideration before I start to flood with both ham and spam?
It's probably easiest if you have them on disk and use the mass-check
utility.
> For those that don't know it means "Delivered direct to MX with Outlook
> headers". Sounds like a good rule: Outlook isn't a MTA so shouldn't be
> able to connect directly to MX records - except for it's configured
> SMTP server.
I looked at our spam reports (spam that was not rejected).
On 27.01.08 15:06, Sevrin Robstad wrote:
> I have used spamassassin over a year on my mail server, using James as
> pop/smtp and a homewritten mailet to connect to spamd through tcp.
> Yesterday I suddenly discovered load average peaks over 100 (!!!) on the
> server, and soon found this :
>
> 2261
Hello,
I decided to benchmark the accuracy of spamassassin. Is there anything special
I should take into consideration before I start to flood with both ham and spam?
TIA,
hc
Never miss a thing. Make
Arlyle Consulting wrote:
Hi,
I have a question, and possible feature request.
I just installed SpamAssassin on my mail server a couple of days ago.
I've been closely studying the messages that get by SA and are spam,
and I've noticed something.
Many of the messages that are spam that SA mi
Hey guys..
We're seeing the same thing.. although slightly different.. this error has
only been happening for a week or so now.. everything's been fine before
that.. it seems to be with the RSA key generated on 15Jan..
An sa-update -D shows :
[/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin]# sa-update -D
[5
Hi,
I have a question, and possible feature request.
I just installed SpamAssassin on my mail server a couple of days ago.
I've been closely studying the messages that get by SA and are spam,
and I've noticed something.
Many of the messages that are spam that SA misses has return addresse
20 matches
Mail list logo
