From: "Robert - elists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 2008, January 18 21:14
You can't run the rules in score-order without driving SA's performance
into the ground.
The key here is SA doesn't run tests sequentially, it runs them in
parallel as it works its way through the body. this allo
>
> You can't run the rules in score-order without driving SA's performance
> into the ground.
>
> The key here is SA doesn't run tests sequentially, it runs them in
> parallel as it works its way through the body. this allows for good,
> efficient use of memory cache.
>
> By running rules in sc
Yes and no. There aren't many negative scored rules, which could easily be
put into a low priority to run first.
The issue, which is where Matt was going I believe, is that the reason score
based short circuiting was removed is that it's horribly slow to keep checking
the score after each rule ru
You can't run the rules in score-order without driving SA's performance
into the ground.
The key here is SA doesn't run tests sequentially, it runs them in
parallel as it works its way through the body. this allows for good,
efficient use of memory cache.
By running rules in score-order, you
> Hello Craig,
>
> I recently ran into this problem myself. The solution,
> after being a dolt and not running a backup first, was
> the following sequence followed by line definitions:
>
>/etc/init.d/mailserver stop
>sa-learn --backup > /etc/mail/spamassassin/database.bak
>sa-learn
Hello Craig,
I recently ran into this problem myself. The solution, after being a
dolt and not running a backup first, was the following sequence
followed by line definitions:
/etc/init.d/mailserver stop
sa-learn --backup > /etc/mail/spamassassin/database.bak
sa-learn --dump magic
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 12:23 -0800, Robert - elists wrote:
> > Sounds like you've been hit by bug 5519 [1] before the upgrade in Oct.
> > Setting rules scores to 0 did *not* prevent these tests from being
> > evaluated for SA 3.2.x before 3.2.3.
> >
> > Fixed since 3.2.3. Plugin eval rules with 0
Noticed today (again) how long some messages take to test. The
first thing that comes to mind is some dns is getting overloaded
answering joe-job rbldns backskatter, causing timeouts or slow
responce times.
Then I was thinking about how some tests are excluded because they
generate too much regex
On Friday 18 January 2008 13:46, you wrote:
> Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to
> > disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl
> > and maybe some other blackhole lists.
> > I guess I can co
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to disable
all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl and maybe
some other blackhole lists.
I guess I can comment out the corresponding header lines in the files
20_dnsbl_t
Quoting Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
the redirect detection should have no problem finding that...
And the redirected-to domain is on two SURBL blacklists, so it should
be hitting.
Jeff C.
Loren Wilton writes:
I guess btnl is no longer working. Now they are doing a redirect:
htt
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to disable
all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl and maybe
some other blackhole lists.
I guess I can comment out the corresponding header lines in the files
20_dnsbl_t
the redirect detection should have no problem finding that...
Loren Wilton writes:
> I guess btnl is no longer working. Now they are doing a redirect:
>
> http://google.co.uk///pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=livermore&num=970&adurl=http://-low-rate.tw?beast
>
>
> Loren
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to disable
all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl and maybe
some other blackhole lists.
I guess I can comment out the corresponding header lines in the files
20_dnsbl_tests.cf and 25_uribl.cf
I guess btnl is no longer working. Now they are doing a redirect:
http://google.co.uk///pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=livermore&num=970&adurl=http://christmas-low-rate.tw?beast
Loren
15 matches
Mail list logo
