Re: spamassassin sendmail virtualusers and mail lists

2008-01-08 Thread Noah
Thanks John, the problem is that our moderators are getting way too much mail and just want to trash the high-scoring meesages. Cheers, Noah John D. Hardin wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Noah wrote: We want to run spamassassin on mail lists If you're managing your mailing lists using Mailm

Re: [Sare-users] Spam content checker

2008-01-08 Thread Loren Wilton
Sg wrote: Hi Thanks for your reply. How to find the email body content(no header) spam value using any API (php, perl, python)? Using SpamAssassin, you pretty much don't. SpamAssassin very fundamentally expects to be working on email. I don't think you can get around that without a si

Re: Bypassing MX

2008-01-08 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Peter Smith wrote: > Here's my situation: > > server1: mail gateway, runs Spamassassin > server2: multi-purpose server. hosts http, mail boxes, pop/imap, runs > sendmail and Spamassassin. > example.org: my domain. The MX record points to server1, A record points to > server2 >

Re: [Sare-users] Spam content checker

2008-01-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Using SpamAssassin, you pretty much don't. SpamAssassin very fundamentally expects to be working on email. I don't think you can get around that without a significant rewrite of the code. Sg wrote: Hi Thanks for your reply. How to find the email body content(no header) spam value usin

Re: [Sare-users] Spam content checker

2008-01-08 Thread Sg
Hi Thanks for your reply. How to find the email body content(no header) spam value using any API (php, perl, python)? Thanks Sg On Jan 9, 2008 5:51 AM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sg wrote: > > Hi > > > > In the SA rules, i've hide the header test names in all the .cf files >

Re: spamassassin sendmail virtualusers and mail lists

2008-01-08 Thread John D. Hardin
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Noah wrote: > We want to run spamassassin on mail lists If you're managing your mailing lists using Mailman, there are patches floating around that will make mailman pass messages through SA and hold high-scoring messages for moderation. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ

spamassassin sendmail virtualusers and mail lists

2008-01-08 Thread Noah
Hi there, I installed have sendmail installed on a FreeBSD machine along with: # pkg_info| grep spam p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3 A highly efficient mail filter for identifying spam razor-agents-2.84 A distributed, collaborative, spam detection and filtering spamass-milter-0.3.1_3 Sendmail Mi

Re: [OT] Volume of mail thru SpamAssassin.

2008-01-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Ben Lentz wrote: Has anyone done anything like this? Any suggestions on how to do it? Any other way to get the count? man mailstats I like mailgraph: http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ There's also six dozen other tools out there that will graph using rrdtool or MRTG. A simple web search f

Re: [Sare-users] Spam content checker

2008-01-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Sg wrote: Hi In the SA rules, i've hide the header test names in all the .cf files and restarted the spamassassin. But i believe, it displaying wrong result (compared this with lyris content checker). Please guide me, how to check the score for content checker using SA rules. Since SA is des

Re: Problem with handle_user

2008-01-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Stefan Suurmeijer wrote: Hi Matt, On Jan 8, 2008 2:36 AM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Stefan Suurmeijer wrote: > > Jan 8 00:47:29 smtp1 spamd[11786]: spamd: connection from localhost [ > 127.0.0.1 < http://127.0.0.

API question

2008-01-08 Thread Matt Hampton
Hi I am running SA from within MailScanner. I am currently running a patch that allow me to overide the Bayes username so that each domain that is processed has it's own bayes database. The patch works like this $Test= new Mail::SpamAssassin(%settings); $Test->{conf}->{bayes_sql_override_usern

Re: [OT] Volume of mail thru SpamAssassin.

2008-01-08 Thread Ben Lentz
Has anyone done anything like this? Any suggestions on how to do it? Any other way to get the count? man mailstats I like mailgraph: http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/

Re: [OT] Volume of mail thru SpamAssassin.

2008-01-08 Thread Jon Trulson
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Reg Clemens wrote: This is somewhat off topic, but I would like to be able to measure the amount of mail that comes into my mail server each day. I don't think that Sendmail has such an option, But since SpamAssassin is a series of scripts, it would seem possible to do the c

[OT] Volume of mail thru SpamAssassin.

2008-01-08 Thread Reg Clemens
This is somewhat off topic, but I would like to be able to measure the amount of mail that comes into my mail server each day. I don't think that Sendmail has such an option, But since SpamAssassin is a series of scripts, it would seem possible to do the count there. Has anyone done anything lik

Re: Problem with handle_user

2008-01-08 Thread Stefan Suurmeijer
Hi Matt, On Jan 8, 2008 2:36 AM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Suurmeijer wrote: > > > > Jan 8 00:47:29 smtp1 spamd[11786]: spamd: connection from localhost [ > > 127.0.0.1 ] at port 5468 > > Jan 8 00:47:29 smtp1 spamd[11786]: spamd: handle_user unable to fi

Re: Bypassing MX

2008-01-08 Thread Marc Perkel
Peter Smith wrote: Here's my situation: server1: mail gateway, runs Spamassassin server2: multi-purpose server. hosts http, mail boxes, pop/imap, runs sendmail and Spamassassin. example.org: my domain. The MX record points to server1, A record points to server2 The problem with this setup of

Re: DDOS, Dictionary Attack... not sure what it is...

2008-01-08 Thread Bookworm
Joseph Brennan wrote: Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: since the server rejects unknown recipients right away. Here too, but it eats nearly 100% of System- and CPU-Resources... It might be worth looking for a couple of addresses that get hit repeatedly and temporarily activating

Re: DDOS, Dictionary Attack... not sure what it is...

2008-01-08 Thread Joseph Brennan
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: since the server rejects unknown recipients right away. Here too, but it eats nearly 100% of System- and CPU-Resources... It might be worth looking for a couple of addresses that get hit repeatedly and temporarily activating them I have tried t

RE: Bypassing MX

2008-01-08 Thread Bowie Bailey
Peter Smith wrote: > Here's my situation: > > server1: mail gateway, runs Spamassassin > server2: multi-purpose server. hosts http, mail boxes, pop/imap, runs > sendmail and Spamassassin. > example.org: my domain. The MX record points to server1, A record > points to server2 > > The problem with

RE: two things I am attempting to do

2008-01-08 Thread Bowie Bailey
Noah wrote: > there are two things I am attempting to do. What is the best approach > to both. > > 1) I am running spamassassin site wide. I'd like to move the mail > message identified as spam in ~/mail/Spam directory > > 2) If a user does not exist and there is an username entry > /etc/mail/v

Re: sa-update problem in 3.2.4

2008-01-08 Thread David Gibbs
Justin Mason wrote: oops, that looks like a bug. could you open an entry on bugzilla.spamassassin.org? Logged as #5769. david -- System i ... for when you can't afford to be out of business

Re: DDOS, Dictionary Attack... not sure what it is...

2008-01-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-01-02 10:14:51, schrieb Kelson: > Actually, it's still going on, but it doesn't have much of an impact > since the server rejects unknown recipients right away. Here too, but it eats nearly 100% of System- and CPU-Resources... > It might be worth looking for a couple of addresses that ge

Re: spamd: still running as root:

2008-01-08 Thread Duane Hill
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:31:00 -0800 Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > how do I track down and correct the following error. I have > spamassassin install on a FreeBSD machine. > > Jan 7 23:29:26 typhoon spamd[62450]: spamd: still running as root: > user not specified with -u, n

Re: Procmail/SA not moving mail into spam folder

2008-01-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hallo Michael, Am 2008-01-03 11:53:41, schrieb Michael Bartlett: > Hi all, > > Wonder if you could help me, I'm trying to get my procmailrc to move > all mail marked as spam into another folder - but it doesn't seem to > work. I understand that this could be a procmail problem - but just > wanted

Re: [Sare-users] Spam content checker

2008-01-08 Thread Sg
Hi In the SA rules, i've hide the header test names in all the .cf files and restarted the spamassassin. But i believe, it displaying wrong result (compared this with lyris content checker). Please guide me, how to check the score for content checker using SA rules. Thanks On Jan 4, 2008 6:23 P

Re: auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile

2008-01-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Noah wrote: Hi there list, I installed the following spamassasin proggies on my FreeBSD machine and receiving an error "auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile" Any clues what I am doing wrong? # pkg_info | grep Spam p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3 A highly eff

Feature request: def_whitelist_from_spf with a DNS based domain list

2008-01-08 Thread ram
I have a spf whitelisting cf with 100s of lines of def_whitelist_from_spf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mainly I have all banks, mailing lists etc The problem is with maintenance of this file. Everytime I have to update this file and rsync it to all my nodes , whenever there is a new entry We could have a

Re: Bypassing MX

2008-01-08 Thread mouss
Peter Smith wrote: Here's my situation: server1: mail gateway, runs Spamassassin server2: multi-purpose server. hosts http, mail boxes, pop/imap, runs sendmail and Spamassassin. example.org: my domain. The MX record points to server1, A record points to server2 The problem with this setup of co

Re: Bypassing MX

2008-01-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 08.01.08 11:04, Peter Smith wrote: > server1: mail gateway, runs Spamassassin > server2: multi-purpose server. hosts http, mail boxes, pop/imap, runs > sendmail and Spamassassin. > example.org: my domain. The MX record points to server1, A record points to > server2 > > The problem with this se

Re: How to restart the spamassassin in command prompt

2008-01-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Sg wrote: > > After modifying the configurations and scores should we restart > >the SA. How to start the SA-3.2.3? On 07.01.08 13:51, maillist wrote: > you really should be able to just type in "\usr\bin\spamd" at the > command prompt, and it will start. "man spamd" will show you the >

Bypassing MX

2008-01-08 Thread Peter Smith
Here's my situation: server1: mail gateway, runs Spamassassin server2: multi-purpose server. hosts http, mail boxes, pop/imap, runs sendmail and Spamassassin. example.org: my domain. The MX record points to server1, A record points to server2 The problem with this setup of course, is that spammer

Re: Spam Assassin Load Balancing

2008-01-08 Thread Paolo Cravero
Thomas Ledbetter wrote: First of all: we're running amavisd-new, not plain spamc/spamd anymore. We used to have N servers each running its own spamd deamons, so with separate Bayes/AWL DB. I have not understood how many machines run spamc and how many spamd. With a rounb robin policy on a ha

Re: Spam Assassin Load Balancing

2008-01-08 Thread Per Jessen
Thomas Ledbetter wrote: > With a rounb robin policy on a hardware load balancer, once the > connection is routed to a specific 'worker bee', if that machine times > out, the request will fail, and the mail wont get scanned. However, > more intelligent hardware load balancing setups can monitor th

Re: Google URI Redirector Spam

2008-01-08 Thread Per Jessen
Ben Lentz wrote: > What's the best way to identify these messages? Do I need to write a > redirector_pattern for these Google-related URI redirects, or is there > more to it than that? What are you folks doing at your sites? I add 2 points for a URI referring to googlepages. /Per Jessen, Züric

Re: spamd: still running as root:

2008-01-08 Thread Per Jessen
Noah wrote: > how do I track down and correct the following error. I have > spamassassin install on a FreeBSD machine. > > Jan 7 23:29:26 typhoon spamd[62450]: spamd: still running as root: > user not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to > nobody Find out where spamd i