I was happily humming along with Spamassassin on Win2k3 with Exchange 2003
for some time now (yes, you can do it all on one box). I was using Chris
Lewis' ESA sink which worked great. However, after an upgrade to Exchange
2007, I've come to realize that the old smtp sinks have been deprecated
>From what I am reading, the change is based in the fact that Event Sinks
have been replaced by Transport Agents, and that Exchange 2007 no longer
depends on IIS.
smtpreg.vbs allowed you to touch the IIS SMTP Service and add rules to
it (allowing VBScript or EXEs to intervene prior to message del
I was happily humming along with Spamassassin on Win2k3 with Exchange 2003 for
some time now (yes, you can do it all on one box). I was using Chris Lewis' ESA
sink which worked great. However, after an upgrade to Exchange 2007, I've come
to realize that the old smtp sinks have been deprecated an
At 10:42 AM 11/24/2007, Jack Gostl wrote:
Too late, its already in the bit bucket. Surprised me too. As I
said, it was just a few words with a 2mb dot bmp file. Nex time I'll
save it in case someone wants to see this piece of junk.
We were receiving some huge spams for a while from a company i
Jack Gostl wrote:
I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no
spamassassin headers at all. I finally found this message in my log:
spamc[523292]: skipped message, greater than max message size (256000
bytes)
The message was close to 2mb, including a very, very
Jack Gostl wrote:
> I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no
> spamassassin headers at all. I finally found this message in my log:
>
> spamc[523292]: skipped message, greater than max message size (256000
> bytes)
>
> The message was close to 2mb, including a very,
--On Friday, November 23, 2007 10:27 PM -0800 Loren Wilton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
header __THE_BAT X-Mailer /^The Bat/
body__BROKEN_LINK/^[\w\.\-]{1,25}\s\.com\s*$/
meta SMALL_MIND__THE_BAT && __BROKEN_LINK
score SMALL_MIND3.5
Linting showed the header needs this:
header
I was trying to figure out why a piece of spam got through with no spamassassin
headers at all. I finally found this message in my log:
spamc[523292]: skipped message, greater than max message size (256000 bytes)
The message was close to 2mb, including a very, very large bmp file. Does
anyo
