Rolf Loudon wrote:
>
>> What's a
>> "sa-learn --dump magic" output look like?
>
> # sa-learn --dump magic
> 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
> 0.000 0297 0 non-token data: nspam
> 0.000 0 982365 0 non-token d
Michael:
Thank you for your response. Point well taken.
Question, using postfix, mailscanner, spamassassin and clam av as my incoming
mail gateway, for an exchange based backend, is there an efficient way to get
mail from an outlook client back into my MTA, particularly spamassassion in
order t
hi
I use sa-update with channels and updates.spamassassin.org.
After the latest run today I am getting matches against BAYES_99
(which adds 3.5) to many messages, where they previously triggered
virtually no rules at all.
This is causing many false positives, to the extent that I've had
Rolf Loudon wrote:
> hi
>
> I use sa-update with channels and updates.spamassassin.org.
>
> After the latest run today I am getting matches against BAYES_99
> (which adds 3.5) to many messages, where they previously triggered
> virtually no rules at all.
>
> This is causing many false positive
the question is what?
how to train sa-learn without populating folders or how to get a corpus
of 'non spam'?
The FAQ's suggest getting emails from your 'sent items' folder.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Office: 561-999-5000 x 1259
Direct: 561-939-7259
Real time security alerts: http://www.secnap.c
hi
I use sa-update with channels saupdates.openprotect.com and
updates.spamassassin.org.
After the latest run today I am getting matches against BAYES_99
(which adds 3.5) to many messages, where they previously triggered
virtually no rules at all.
This is causing many false positives, t
Micah Anderson writes:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071119 10:01]:
> > N> PS: I post to this list using gmane. Is it possible to stop delivery
> > N> on my email address so that I can post but I do not receive the list
> > N> messages?
> >
> > http://www.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all:
Scenario:
I would like to take HAM mail from out look and let it be used to train
the SA-Learn Bayes filter. I do not want my users though to start
dragging and dropping mail into folders for SA-Learn to pull from. I
wish to admin all the learning features on the back end. I have
succe
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071119 10:01]:
> N> PS: I post to this list using gmane. Is it possible to stop delivery
> N> on my email address so that I can post but I do not receive the list
> N> messages?
>
> http://www.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can this information be added to
h
>> http://www.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
N> I think that address is not working any more. I first unsubscribed
N> from the list and then I sent a message to that address: that's what I got
>> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org. I'm afraid I
>> wasn't able to deliver your message to
On Monday 19 November 2007 06:08, ram wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 23:36 +0100, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I need a perl script which is able to extract a mail from the appendix of
> > an other mail.
> > The idea is that people can send me mails with non recognized spams in
> > the
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:36:12PM +0100, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
> I need a perl script which is able to extract a mail from the appendix of an
> other mail.
There are samples of that kind of thing using the Mail::SpamAssassin::Message
module. Search the list archive.
--
Randomly Selected Tagli
N> PS: I post to this list using gmane. Is it possible to stop delivery
N> on my email address so that I can post but I do not receive the list
N> messages?
http://www.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:21:12AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > machines. Is there a way to detect (in ways of a script) that a mail has
> > been
> > processed by report safe, or yet better, a done way to undo it? I've heard
> > sa-learn does it, so i'd guess it has been done ...
Oh
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:21:12AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > machines. Is there a way to detect (in ways of a script) that a mail has
> > been
> > processed by report safe, or yet better, a done way to undo it? I've heard
> > sa-learn does it, so i'd guess it has been done ...
"s
On Nov 19, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Andrew Hearn (AAISP) wrote:
Rene Caspari wrote:
Hi,
I'm using spamassassing 3.2.3 with userspecific rules from an SQL
database:
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf:
user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost
[...]
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAss
Rene Caspari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using spamassassing 3.2.3 with userspecific rules from an SQL
> database:
>
> /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:
> user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost
> [...]
> bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL
> [...]
> auto_white
Paul Arnone wrote:
> SpamAssassin does not appear to be adding anything to any emails at all. I
> do not know where in our mail chain SpamAssassin was being called (but I
> guess I'll have to figure it out).
>
> We use qmail and clamav with SA. I'll have to go through the boot process
> step by s
We do have Simscan installed which I believe is supposed to do what you say
and call SpamAssassin. Now all I need to do is find out where.
Paul Arnone
Network Administrator
---
NuTech Solutions, Inc.
121 West Trade Street - Suite 1900
Charlotte, NC
SpamAssassin does not appear to be adding anything to any emails at all. I
do not know where in our mail chain SpamAssassin was being called (but I
guess I'll have to figure it out).
We use qmail and clamav with SA. I'll have to go through the boot process
step by step to see if I can figure out
On 18.11.07 21:54, Stefan Walk wrote:
> I'm kind of annoyed because there are, for a few of my email addresses,
> several spamassassins at work, and they all use report_safe. On the final
> machine (mine), there's a spamassassin running too. So, to prevent a message
> from ending up in my mail c
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas schrieb:
> >(you can install sa-3.2.3 from debian-volatile archive now)
On 18.11.07 21:56, Nico Weinreich wrote:
> I've upgraded to 3.2.3 from tarball (Debian testing provides only 3.2.1)
^^^
I wrote "volatile", not "testi
On 18.11.07 15:14, IT Systems Chemnitz wrote:
> I'm looking for an option to limit the file size, sa-learn is learning
> from. I don't use spamd, so I cannot use spamc. When learning with
> sa-learn, it accepts a file or a dir as source. The problem is, when
> there is a message with a size abou
23 matches
Mail list logo
