Re: It's a fine line...

Olivier Nicole wrote: >> It's not a matter of cultural imperialism, if that's what you're getting at. >> >> It's an acknowledgment of the importance of the "rule of law" in cyberspace. >> > > Except that I don't think it is anything close to a rule of law, but > rather a sign of short view. >

Re: It's a fine line...

> It's not a matter of cultural imperialism, if that's what you're getting at. > > It's an acknowledgment of the importance of the "rule of law" in cyberspace. Except that I don't think it is anything close to a rule of law, but rather a sign of short view. As I said, I doubt you ever got any sp

Pretty good, Paypal are making their own phish these days!

Just got a thing that claims to come from "email-109.paypal.com". It backtracks to there, too. pts rule name description -- -- 0.0 DK_POLICY_TESTING Domain Keys: policy says domain is testing DK 0.0 DK_SI

Re: It's a fine line...

Olivier Nicole wrote: And not to point fingers, how to react with a narrow minded sysadmin that ban per IP? From my legitimate mail server in Thailand, that has never been blacklisted as far as I know: mail45: telnet mail.redfish-solutions.com 25 Trying 66.232.79.143... Connected to

Re: It's a fine line...

Hi, adding to the list, I recently came across domain contacts like [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not sure about the exact domain name) This "service" also refuses some mails, particularly those that are sent via one of the mail servers of german telecom and it is operated by verisign Wolfgang Hamann

Re: Confirm configuration settings

Joey wrote: A lot of the SARE rules support sa-update, as can be found here. http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt I have seen this page before, but I wasn't able to see what cf's are available there, is there another link that you are aware of? I have scanned throu

Re: Everything beying flagged positive by Bayes

Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 29.10.07 10:19, tad1214 wrote: >> Ok so I just threw a few hundred (thousand?) hams at it, we will see if >> that >> helps, here is my dump magic >> >> 0.000 0 110832 0 non-token data: nspam >> 0.000 0 11160 0

Re: It's a fine line...

And not to point fingers, how to react with a narrow minded sysadmin that ban per IP? >From my legitimate mail server in Thailand, that has never been blacklisted as far as I know: mail45: telnet mail.redfish-solutions.com 25 Trying 66.232.79.143... Connected to mail.redfish-solutions

Re: It's a fine line...

Hi, > Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign ignorance > to cover up their implicit approval of spammers... > > What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to > their "abuse" mailbox? (Like 99% of mail sent there isn't going to > score positively..

Re: It's a fine line...

On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Philip Prindeville wrote: > Well, Yahoo is a waste of time for other reasons, right? They > tell you that it doesn't come from their site... I generally don't get spam from Yahoo MTAs; most of my reporting is of fraud spams with yahoo contact addresses. -- John Hardin KA7O

Re: Spamd HIGH LOAD

Matt Kettler wrote: > > Your swap used should never be more than mem free if you can > avoid it. > Note: by "mem free" I mean total "free" memory.. i.e.: mem free + buffers + cache. It's quite normal for just the "free" memory number to be low. Most OS's will turn free memory into a really b

Re: Spamd HIGH LOAD

Qnet .. wrote: > I start : > > #!/bin/sh > # spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon > # > > PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin > case "$1" in > start) > cd / > > /usr/bin/spamd -v -u vpopmail -m 60 -x -q -s stderr -r > /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid \ >

RE: Spamd HIGH LOAD

I start : #!/bin/sh # spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon # PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin case "$1" in start) cd / /usr/bin/spamd -v -u vpopmail -m 60 -x -q -s stderr -r /var/run/spamd/spamd.pid \ -i 172.16.10.14 -A 172.16.10.

Re: FW: Spamd HIGH LOAD

At 14:13 05-11-2007, Qnet .. wrote: I used /usr/bin/sa-update –D allways. then restart. but I have the load problem still. Do you know other way to solve it? thanks. http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FasterPerformance Regards, -sm

Re: Spamd HIGH LOAD

How do you start spamassassin? On 11/5/07, Qnet .. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I used /usr/bin/sa-update –D allways. then restart. but I have the load > problem still. Do you know other way to solve it? thanks. > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: Spa

FW: Spamd HIGH LOAD

I used /usr/bin/sa-update –D allways. then restart. but I have the load problem still. Do you know other way to solve it? thanks. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Spamd HIGH LOAD Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 16:11:57 -0500 From: Qnet .. [ma

Re: Mail getting stripped and delivered blank

On 11/5/07, Joey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a situation where a user gets a blank subject, and blank body, there > is really NO information in the email so it's not possible to add too much > info here. > > I believe the following is the transaction between postfix and then spamd I > belie

RE: Spamd HIGH LOAD

From: Qnet .. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 2:47 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Spamd HIGH LOAD Hi, My Qmail server work with spamassassin + clamav. The processes Spamd take the most part of the load so it 's Spamassassin crash. Do you know any wa

RE: Confirm configuration settings

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 8:38 AM > To: Joey > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Confirm configuration settings > > > > > After my post Help figuring our why SA is taking like 1.5 minutes to > > fi

Re: It's a fine line...

At 12:54 PM 11/5/2007, Philip Prindeville wrote: Well, Yahoo is a waste of time for other reasons, right? They tell you that it doesn't come from their site... but to use the top-most Received: line's IP address, then to look that up on ARIN which... surprise! ... typically points to Ya

Re: It's a fine line...

John D. Hardin wrote: On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Steven Kurylo wrote: Philip Prindeville wrote: Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign ignorance to cover up their implicit approval of spammers... What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to th

Mail getting stripped and delivered blank

Hello All, I have a situation where a user gets a blank subject, and blank body, there is really NO information in the email so it's not possible to add too much info here. I believe the following is the transaction between postfix and then spamd I believe re-injecting the message: Nov

Re: Spamd HIGH LOAD

Qnet .. wrote: Hi, My Qmail server work with spamassassin + clamav. The processes Spamd take the most part of the *load *so it 's Spamassassin crash. Do you know any way to solve it? Please look the attach file( top -d1 ). Thank you so munch ! ---

Re: It's a fine line...

On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Steven Kurylo wrote: > Philip Prindeville wrote: > > Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign > > ignorance to cover up their implicit approval of spammers... > > > > What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to > > their "abuse" m

[no subject]

Hi, My Qmail server work with spamassassin + clamav. The processes Spamd take the most part of the load so it 's Spamassassin crash. Do you know any way to solve it? Please look the attach file( top -d1 ). Thank you so munch ! __

RE: Spamcontrol Question !!

At 10:29 AM 11/5/2007, Qnet .. wrote: sorry for 3 copies, but spamcontrol is not spamassassin, spamcontrol is installed in my Qmail server and i want to kwon if spamcontrol accept or not non-existent addresses. Thank You- If spamcontrol is not spamassassin, why ask on a spamassassin mailin

RE: Spamcontrol Question !!

> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:20:11 -0800 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Spamcontrol Question !! > > At 10:16 AM 11/5/2007, Qnet .. wrote: > >Hi, > > > >the Spamcontrol do not accept the non-existent addresses the server? > >or a have to Patch my exis

RE: Spamcontrol Question !!

On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Qnet .. wrote: but spamcontrol is not spamassassin, spamcontrol is installed in my Qmail server and i want to kwon if spamcontrol accept or not non-existent addresses. Thank You- If SpamControl is not SpamAssassin, perhaps a SpamAssassin list is not the best place to ask f

RE: Spamcontrol Question !!

> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:20:11 -0800 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Spamcontrol Question !! > > At 10:16 AM 11/5/2007, Qnet .. wrote: > >Hi, > > > >the Spamcontrol do not accept the non-existent addresses the server? > >or a have to Patch my exis

Re: Spamcontrol Question !!

At 10:16 AM 11/5/2007, Qnet .. wrote: Hi, the Spamcontrol do not accept the non-existent addresses the server? or a have to Patch my existing Server with ValidRcptTo.cdb to that does just this?.. Than You, sorry for my bad english Pleas

High load Server !!

Qnet .. schrieb: > Hi Guys, > I'm running a Qmail server with spamassassin + clamav + Simscam. > The server i'm using is a HP ML110 CPU PIV (3.2 GHZ) 2mb chache , 1GB RAM. > > The problem is, the i'm getting very high load because spamd is the processes > which take the most part of the load > (

Re: It's a fine line...

Steven Kurylo wrote: Philip Prindeville wrote: Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign ignorance to cover up their implicit approval of spammers... What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to their "abuse" mailbox? (Like 99% of mail sent there i

[no subject]

Qnet .. schrieb: > Hi Guys, > I'm running a Qmail server with spamassassin + clamav + Simscam. > The server i'm using is a HP ML110 CPU PIV (3.2 GHZ) 2mb chache , 1GB RAM. > > The problem is, the i'm getting very high load because spamd is the processes > which take the most part of the load > (

Re: It's a fine line...

Philip Prindeville wrote: Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign ignorance to cover up their implicit approval of spammers... What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to their "abuse" mailbox? (Like 99% of mail sent there isn't going to score p

It's a fine line...

Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign ignorance to cover up their implicit approval of spammers... What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to their "abuse" mailbox? (Like 99% of mail sent there isn't going to score positively...) Sigh.

High Load Qmail Server

hi, i used spamcontrol-2316 with Qmail 1.03. the validrcptto patch is compatible with this? . Spmacontrol does not just that ?. Thank you so much. > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: High Qmail-Server Load > Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:59:50 -0700

High Load Qmail Server

hi, i used spamcontrol-2316 with Qmail 1.03. the validrcptto patch is compatible with this? . Spmacontrol does not just that ?. Thank you so much. > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: High Qmail-Server Load > Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:59:50 -0700

[no subject]

hi, i used spamcontrol-2316 with Qmail 1.03. the validrcptto patch is compatible with this? . Spmacontrol does not just that ?. Thank you so much. > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: High Qmail-Server Load > Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:59:50 -0700

syswrite() to parent failed: Broken pipe at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm line 570

SpamD seems to die every now and again (every couple of days) and though I have a script which checks regularly for various key services and restarts them if they are missing, it is letting a couple of spam through each time... The error message I am getting in my maillog when this happens is: s

Re: SA date on 2 tmp file 1970

- Original Message - From: "Martin.Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SpamAssassin Users" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 7:15 AM Subject: Re: SA date on 2 tmp file 1970 Mark you mean 3.2.3 rather than 2.3.2??? ;-) -- martin Yes!