On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 08:32:20AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Any pointer/example? I am quite new to this (and lame OO programmer).
Sure, search the list archive for PDF and post_message_parse. ie:
http://www.nabble.com/PDFText-Plugin-for-PDF-file-scoring---not-for-PDF-images-tf4077171.html
> I'd just convert the PDF into something usable by SA and scan it that way,
> instead of trying to kluge around the whole thing. There are specific plug=
> in
> hooks and such to support this type of thing.
Any pointer/example? I am quite new to this (and lame OO programmer).
TIA,
Olivier
> My Sr. Admin is asking for that.
Maybe you should ask your Senior Admin why he wants a version 2.6? 2.6
are very old, they date back to Aug 2004 for the latest one, many new
rules will not work, many plugins will not work, so you are likely to
miss a huge bunch of spam.
It sounds as sensible as
> Wow! If someone sends a message and misspells oppportunity by using
> three letter p's instead of two then they get tagged for 3.7 points!
> I think that is way too agressive. Scan this message to observe the
> problem.
That may be that the likelyness a human make a miss spelling using 3
Ps is
> I have a severe problem with one of my mailservers. I'm using spamassassin
> 3.2.3 in combination with exim 4.66, and experience hanging spamd processes
> which consume all my server resources.
> I've searched these mailing lists, searched google, searched documentation,
> ... I found very much o
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 08:46 -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:43 PM -0700 Loren Wilton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FWFW, I ran masschecks on the original posted rules and got zero hits in
> > any corpus. That rather surprised me. But it may indicate that thi
A misclassified message caused me to look at the FRT_OPPORTUN1 and
FRT_OPPORTUN2 rules. I think they are much too aggressive. Here is
the summary from a false positive.
Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- ---
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Mike Kenny wrote:
> Thanks John, I had tried this. It appears that the \1 is not
> defined within the pattern. Only for substitution?
It should work within perl match REs per "man perlre". I'm not sure
how SA changes that context.
You might also try:
//
but I'm less conf
Thanks John, I had tried this. It appears that the \1 is not defined within
the pattern. Only for substitution?
mike
On 11/2/07, John D. Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Mike Kenny wrote:
>
> > I have a number of users that are receiving spam of varying types. The
> only
First, this answer will not solve your problem but I wish will help
you to identify the exact trouble.
Try to disable every module/option, one by one.
Also try to remove some rules, maybe start with __DOS_HAS_ANY_URI
That will not solve your issue but it will probably help to find what
is causing
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Mike Kenny wrote:
> I have a number of users that are receiving spam of varying types. The only
> common factor is the from address. This looks like
>
> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> where sX.com looks like it is a genuine site name, e.g.
> shibatec.com
> southstreetfinancial.
Thanks a lot.
My Sr. Admin is asking for that.
On 11/2/07, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02.11.07 17:27, Ranjith Kumar wrote:
> > Where can I get the spamassassin 2.6 version for download?
>
> btw may I know, why the 2.6 version?
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PR
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:52:51AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> I am wondering if some hiden method exist in Mail::SpamAssassin module
> to only check the body of an email?
No, short of you removing/disabling non-body rules.
> The problem is the following. I am looking at PDFassassin plugin
> h
Dominique wrote:
> i can't figure out how to set this up from my cpanel 10. i've
> configured it but it isn't working. messages aren't tagged or
> filtered when coming thru my ms outlook.
I have heard of cpanel, but I've never seen it.
You may get better results asking this question on a cpa
On 02.11.07 17:27, Ranjith Kumar wrote:
> Where can I get the spamassassin 2.6 version for download?
btw may I know, why the 2.6 version?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto a
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how to use the method got_hit in
Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus.
I am searching for the value to use with the ruletype bellow, as per
the documenttation on the web
(http://search.cpan.org/~jmason/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm)
but I
I have a number of users that are receiving spam of varying types. The only
common factor is the from address. This looks like
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
where sX.com looks like it is a genuine site name, e.g.
shibatec.com
southstreetfinancial.com
skiprockmultimedia.com
etc.
What I need (I think)
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:27 +0530, Ranjith Kumar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Where can I get the spamassassin 2.6 version for download?
> Please help me.
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Mail/
specifically:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Mail/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.64.tar.gz
http://www.cpan.or
Hello,
Where can I get the spamassassin 2.6 version for download?
Please help me.
Thanks
Ranjith
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 5:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: running sa-update gives error
>
> > error: gpg required but not found!
>
> Install gpg, for example fr
> error: gpg required but not found!
Install gpg, for example from http://www.gnupg.org/
Olivier
On 2 Nov 2007, at 09:51, Olivier Nicole wrote:
I can install LWP::UserAgent
but I do not know how to fix @INC setting, if that is what is
required.
How do I check what it is supposed to be?
If you install LWP::UserAgent through cpan (the recommended way) it
will be installed at the right
> I can install LWP::UserAgent
>
> but I do not know how to fix @INC setting, if that is what is required.
> How do I check what it is supposed to be?
If you install LWP::UserAgent through cpan (the recommended way) it
will be installed at the right place, hopefully inside one of your
@INClude di
On 2 Nov 2007, at 09:20, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tony Baker wrote:
server:~ root# sa-update
Can't locate LWP/UserAgent.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /Library/
Perl/5.8.6/darwin-thread-multi-2level /Library/Perl/5.8.6 /System/
Library/Perl/5.8.6/darwin-thread-multi-2level /System/Library/Perl/
Hi,
As mentionned earlier, i am playing with PDFassassin plugin.
Now when I test run I get the error message:
warn: plugin: failed to create instance of plugin Pdf:
But at same time the plugin is loaded and it scored the message, so
what this warning could be about?
TIA,
Olivier
Tony Baker wrote:
server:~ root# sa-update
Can't locate LWP/UserAgent.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/Library/Perl/5.8.6/darwin-thread-multi-2level /Library/Perl/5.8.6
/System/Library/Perl/5.8.6/darwin-thread-multi-2level
/System/Library/Perl/5.8.6 /Library/Perl
/Network/Library/Perl/5.8.6/darwin
Tarak Ranjan wrote:
How do i get Spamassassin POD ??
Install SpamAssassin and/or download the SpamAssassin source tarball.
Daryl
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Tarak Ranjan wrote:
Hi List,
Can anyone give me the link where i can download Complete
Documentation Of Spamassassin in PDF.
http://search.cpan.org/~ajfry/Pod-Pdf-1.2/Pdf.pm
How do i get Spamassassin POD ??
Hi
I have an Apple Intel Xserve running MacOSX 10.4.10
I have recently upgraded spamassassin to
server:~ root# spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.6
Now when I run sa-update i get the following returned..
server:~ root# sa-update
Can't locate LWP/UserAgent
Tarak Ranjan wrote:
Hi List,
Can anyone give me the link where i can download Complete
Documentation Of Spamassassin in PDF.
http://search.cpan.org/~ajfry/Pod-Pdf-1.2/Pdf.pm
30 matches
Mail list logo
