Justin Mason wrote:
>
> Matt, any chance you could open a bz feature request for this?
>
Done.. also added to it so there's now 3 warning level options.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5710
> --j.
>
Joseph Brennan wrote:
>
>
> Excerpt, headers from a generated message from myspace (I have folded
> lines for legibility) :
>
> Received: from vmta17.myspace.com (vmta17.myspace.com [204.16.33.80])
> by cayenne.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9U3N5he001961
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FWFW, I ran masschecks on the original posted rules and got zero hits in any
corpus. That rather surprised me. But it may indicate that this is either
a very recent thing or isn't all that universal.
Loren
On Friday, October 26, 2007 11:55 PM +0200 KarstenBräckelmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Oct 30, 2007 12:27 PM, Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Notice the all-lower-case field names, which do not conform to the
> RFC 2822 field names that they almost match. That is, a "from:"
> header is not the same as a "From:" header!
It's *supposed* to be the same. RFC *822 does
Hi Guys,
I'm running a Qmail server with spamassassin + clamav + Simscam.
The server i'm using is a HP ML110 CPU PIV (3.2 GHZ) 2mb chache , 1GB RAM.
The problem is, the i'm getting very high load because spamd is the processes
which take the most part of the load
(invoked by spamassassin) si it's
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
I have been running spamassassin for over 2 years now, and suddenly, the
required score has changed. I have it set to 7.0, but it has suddenly
changed back to the default of 5.0. I only n
On Friday, October 26, 2007 11:55 PM +0200 KarstenBräckelmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
NOTE: I only did a very brief investigation of Date: headers sent by
The Bat! users on this list. If anyone can assure this, or got any
inside knowledge whether The Bat! can or can not generate such header
Hi friends,
It has solved the problem of the message headers to SA to work with SPF, this
has been done by applying the Qmail patch QmailSpfPatch which is on the web
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/QmailSpfPatch
Thanks
> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:13:06 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sub
Excerpt, headers from a generated message from myspace (I have folded
lines for legibility) :
Received: from vmta17.myspace.com (vmta17.myspace.com [204.16.33.80])
by cayenne.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9U3N5he001961
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:23:10 -0400
I appreciate that you would like to see it working right, Daryl. To
that, I'd add, "me, too." But, like I said, I had to move on, and I
hope to get back to it soon. And, by the way, I played with setting
the update paths to all kinds of places, and all kinds of
permissions, too. ;-) I'm sure
Andy Norris wrote:
No, it was not a permissions issue. I'll get back to working on it soon,
but, yes there were newer versions than what I was seeing on my server.
There are so many posts about sa-update not working. I'm sure sa-update
works, for some folks, but it wasn't for me, and I had to
No, it was not a permissions issue. I'll get back to working on it
soon, but, yes there were newer versions than what I was seeing on my
server. There are so many posts about sa-update not working. I'm sure
sa-update works, for some folks, but it wasn't for me, and I had to
quit spending time
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:35 -0500, Andy Norris wrote:
So a down and
dirty approach I took was writing a crop job that removes that
directory just before running sa-update.
So, you delete it every time, even when there are no updates? And since
updates occur about
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:35 -0500, Andy Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this is relevant for you or not, but on our mail
> server I could not get sa-update to work, either. I noticed that if
> the directory was not there, however, it would work.
Sounds like a permissions issue.
>
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 11:57 -0400, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> The documentation for whitelist_from_rcvd shows examples like this:
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
>
> What if the sending server has no rDNS?
They you can't use whitelist_from_rcvd, and the sender needs to
Matt Kettler writes:
> Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> > Justin Mason wrote:
> >> OK, we really need to figure out some way to kill these FAQs off. Every
> >> week, someone asks a question about why SpamAssassin is killing their
> >> server, and most of the time the answer is "stop using blacklist.cf
The documentation for whitelist_from_rcvd shows examples like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
What if the sending server has no rDNS? Is there a way to use this feature
with a numeric IP instead of a rDNS domain? If so, what is the syntax?
Thanks, Larry
> > > xou4 schrieb:
> > >> Hello,
> > >> I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Or for procmail (this rule is for 20, add or decrease \* as appropriate):
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
/dev/null
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:00:52 +0100
Matthias Haegele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confabulated:
> Matthias Haegele schrieb:
> > xou4 schrieb:
> >> Hello,
> >> I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
> >> Thank you in advance for your help
> >
> > spamassassin "tags" messages whatever "filter"
"debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir"
Oh dear, that's definitely wrong.
You should have
config: using "/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002003" for default rules dir
try setting the MailScanner.conf line to
SpamAssassin Local State Dir = # /var/lib/spamassassin
And see if th
Matthias Haegele schrieb:
xou4 schrieb:
Hello,
I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Thank you in advance for your help
spamassassin "tags" messages whatever "filter" you use could do this ...
Perhaps you want to use amavisd-new or procmail or ...
(Using Postfix/amavisd-new/
xou4 schrieb:
Hello,
I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Thank you in advance for your help
spamassassin "tags" messages whatever "filter" you use could do this ...
Xou
--
Grüsse/Greetings
MH
Dont send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
xou4 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confabulated:
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
>
> Thank you in advance for your help
>
> Xou
Your email server software (MTA) has to do that. SpamAssassin just
scans what you feed it. It d
Hello,
I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
Thank you in advance for your help
Xou
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/remove-email-tf4718582.html#a13489061
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Read this http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavisd-settings.html
And you’ll be set.
Regards,
Leon Kolchinsky
From: Agnello George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 8:31 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject:
Thanks Andy,
I have verified that sa-update is running and the rules folder is getting
populated with lots of files.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October-30-07 9:35 AM
To: Randal, Phil
Cc: Rob Starr;
Subject: Re: Custom rules working, but not sa-
Hi,
I don't know if this is relevant for you or not, but on our mail
server I could not get sa-update to work, either. I noticed that if
the directory was not there, however, it would work. So a down and
dirty approach I took was writing a crop job that removes that
directory just before
Boy, that's a handy command. I'll have to write that one down.
I'm getting:
In Debugging mode, not forking...
SpamAssassin temp dir = /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/SpamAssassin-Temp
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? no
debug: ignore: test message to precompile patterns an
A few weeks ago, I posted the following question:
Hello
I have a severe problem with one of my mailservers. I'm using spamassassin
3.2.3 in combination with exim 4.66, and experience hanging spamd processes
which consume all my server resources.
I've searched these mailing lists, searched google,
Is there a rule where I can give a score for enevelope from not
matching header from
Atleast the domain part
for eg, if someone forges my banks domain name in the header from ( They
cant use that in the envelope from because my bank uses SPF records and
phishers get caught easily ) then I want t
Right, and what does the
MailScanner --debug --debug-sa
output say it is using?
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 October 2007 12:29
> To: users@spamassassin.a
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:04:31 -0400
Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confabulated:
> Guys,
>
> How can I fix this?
>
> error: Can't locate Sys/Syslog/Win32.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i586-linux-thread-multi
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i
Thanks for your response Phil,
In an attempt to resolve the issue, I'm now using MailScanner 4.64.3 and
have started from a fresh config file, so my "Spamassassin Local State Dir"
line also reads:
SpamAssassin Local State Dir = # /var/lib/spamassassin
And, as I mentioned, a lint test shows that
Guys,
How can I fix this?
error: Can't locate Sys/Syslog/Win32.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i586-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i586-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i586-linux-thre
Rob, that could be a MailScanner config problem. You don't say which
version of MailScanner, alas.
In /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf check the "Spamassassin Local State
Dir" line.
Mine reads:
SpamAssassin Local State Dir = # /var/lib/spamassassin
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Enginee
I should also mention that SA 3.1.3 was working flawlessly until the update
to 3.2.3. I've used the newer config files and been through most of the
options, but still no luck.
Rob Starr wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Postfix + MailScanner + MailWatch + SpamAssassin 3.2.3.
>
> My problem is
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: sa-update
Obantec Support wrote:
Hi
i run sa-update from cron and last update seems to be Oct18 2007
running spamassassin
Agnello George schrieb:
Hi
i have installed amavisd new on my postfix mailserver. Now i need to test
spam , so I sent a mail with the following text in the body ( see link )
.. this is found at http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ .
As per the logs the mal is being blocked, but our requirem
38 matches
Mail list logo
