Srilatha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some Anti Spam Engines classify mails as : Clean, Spam or Bulk
> What is this Bulk classification ?
Difficult to guess without knowing which products you are referring to.
> With SpamAssassin, i observed that only Spam or Clean classification
> are possible. Does not i
Hi,
Some Anti Spam Engines classify mails as : Clean, Spam or Bulk
What is this Bulk classification ?
With SpamAssassin, i observed that only Spam or Clean classification
are possible.
Does not it classify the mail as Bulk ?
Can anyone please clarify my doubts
regards,
Srilatha
Hi,
> Since few days ago, I have SA looping on certain messages.
I found out that SA would loop for just any meesage for certain
specific user.
It turns out that these users are over quota in their home directory
where SA would store the various bayes db, autowhitelist db etc.
Is there a way to
Take the :addr off.
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "chteh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:14 PM
Subject: How to write a rule to filter this email?
Hi all,
Recently I wrote a rule to filter a Viagra emails. I found that the
pattern
of this s
Hi all,
Recently I wrote a rule to filter a Viagra emails. I found that the pattern
of this spam emails are the "From" is appear as "Viagra.com Inc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>".
In my local.cd, I have added a simple rule which like this:
header No_Viagra_From From:addr =~ /viagra/i
score
Or, better yet, just change the name on the email to lines when you
complain to many isp's.
They forward those to the spammers who happily add you to their 'known
valid email address list'.
Also, google for various opt-out pages. You opt out of the wrong page,
you know you will get spam.
Also,
Evan Platt wrote:
> If you don't get an answer here, a Qmail forum would be the next place
> to look.
>
> Essentially you need to tell Qmail to call SpamAssassin. I run postfix
> and use procmail, so can't tell you how on Qmail.
>
Just look on the SpamAssassin wiki - search for "qmail"...
And of
Jeff,
> I'm working on a SpamAssassin plugin for a university research project.
> I've debugged a lot of it by running SpamAssassin from the command line,
> and using the SA logger's dbg() and info() methods to output stuff.
>
> Now I need to put it in a production server and see the same debug
>
Dale Carstensen wrote:
> Should this rule just be dropped from
> whatever distributes it to me automatically (spamassassin.org,
> and SARE from openprotect)?
Yes.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5632
If you don't get an answer here, a Qmail forum would be the next place to look.
Essentially you need to tell Qmail to call SpamAssassin. I run
postfix and use procmail, so can't tell you how on Qmail.
At 03:37 PM 9/20/2007, Waz wrote:
Hi -
Please bear with me as I am new to SA and server ad
Hi -
Please bear with me as I am new to SA and server administration in general.
I have a Fedora box and installed SA via:
yum install spamassassin
Everything seemed to load. I check the .etc/mail/spamassassin folder and the
local.cf gile seems fine
I installed as root as I want it system w
>ram,
>
>> On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 08:36 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
[ snip -- discussion of slow response from
combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com ]
>
> Mark
It appears from my logs back as far as August 7, 2007, all I get is
SERVFAIL, certainly today there is no routing path to either
ram wrote:
Sorry this is OT.
We run large email setups for our clients and I also have created many
spamtrap ids. But the problem is I dont seem to get many mails in these
ids
How can I best create spamtrap ids.
The standard methods of publishing ids on your site etc doesnt seem to
work
W
I'm working on a SpamAssassin plugin for a university research project.
I've debugged a lot of it by running SpamAssassin from the command line,
and using the SA logger's dbg() and info() methods to output stuff.
Now I need to put it in a production server and see the same debug
information in the
Yes and no,
Some people use know good RBL like sbl.spamhaus.org to discard the
email but will also use a RBL of dynamic IP to score the email or any
other "hard" rbl.
Of course, you have ask people to check the headers of the email to
see if the reason is specify there?
François Rousseau
2007
Hey all!
I started to see these September 12th:
Sep 19 16:01:17 vineyardgateway spamd[26422]: Malformed UTF-8 character
(unexpected continuation byte 0x82, with no preceding start byte) in pattern
match (m//) at /etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_specific.cf, rule
SARE_SPEC_REPL_OBFU5, line 1.
It ap
Giampaolo,
> Well, I have 3.2.1 and the excerpt from AsyncLoop.pm was from there.
> But anyway, how is supposed to be set the timeout value of a non-DNS query?
The current code in trunk is able to specify and honour individual
timeouts for each async request - and it defaults to rbl_timeout
if no
I had the exact same problem with a mySQL setup. The problem was
permissions, the mySQL user did not have delete permissions for the that
table so it could not remove the rows. Once I did that, everything
started working fine.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Koontz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Mark Martinec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Giampaolo,
>
>
> Not really (at least not in the current trunk I'm looking at).
> As long as there are any (non timed-out) requests in %$pending,
> it does not terminate, even if poll returns empty-handed.
Well, I
Hi,
Since few days ago, I have SA looping on certain messages.
mail: spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.1.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mail: uname -a
FreeBSD mail.cs.ait.ac.th 4.11-RELEASE-p21 FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p21 #7: Fri Sep
8 14:14:27 ICT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/s
Mark Martinec writes:
> > Almost. One of the biggest problems I see is that one can't register a
> > socket with AsyncLoop.pm. Thereby, when DNS lookups are finished, the whole
> > loop stops regardless of outstanding non-DNS-based lookups.
> >
> > See sub complete_lookups in AsyncLoop.pm:
> >
hello,
my co-worker has come accross some interesting articles (links
below) about hardware accelerated regexp matching (using specialised
hardware or even popular PCI Express GPU cards). Has anyone thought
about using this in SA? The benchmarks done using Kaspersky AV are
very promising... SA
Giampaolo,
> Almost. One of the biggest problems I see is that one can't register a
> socket with AsyncLoop.pm. Thereby, when DNS lookups are finished, the whole
> loop stops regardless of outstanding non-DNS-based lookups.
>
> See sub complete_lookups in AsyncLoop.pm:
> my $nfound = $self->{m
23 matches
Mail list logo
