dvogel wrote:
> I've been seeing these errors in my mail log. This is SpamAssassin version
> 3.2.3 running on Perl version 5.8.8. Installed via apt on debian/stable.
> I've tried to `apt-get install --reinstall spamassassin spamc`, but that did
> not work. Is this likely the result of a misconfigur
I dunno if anybody else will find this useful, but I made a modification
to
DCC.pm that will make it display the same DCC results via the SpamAssassin
report that dcc would normally add in it's header.
You probably ought to open a Bugzilla enhancement ticket for this and
attach the patch. It
Sorry for the dupes. Had a wrong setting in mutt and thought these two
didn't get sent properly. :-/ (my solution to this problem being to send a
third message... Hmmm...)
--
Gus
I dunno if anybody else will find this useful, but I made a modification to
DCC.pm that will make it display the same DCC results via the SpamAssassin
report that dcc would normally add in it's header.
http://www.disco-zombie.net/tmp/dcc_header_plugin.tar.gz
Normally, dccproc/ifd/whatever add
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:54:28PM -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
>
> sa-compile appears to examine rules downloaded via sa-update, including custom
> channels like dostech. However, it does not appear to pick up custom rules,
> or
> anything else, from files in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Is this a b
I dunno if anybody else will find this useful, but I made a modification to
DCC.pm that will make it display the same DCC results via the SpamAssassin
report that dcc would normally add in it's header.
http://www.disco-zombie.net/tmp/dcc_header_plugin.tar.gz
Normally, dccproc/ifd/whatever add
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:54:28PM -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
>
> sa-compile appears to examine rules downloaded via sa-update, including custom
> channels like dostech. However, it does not appear to pick up custom rules,
> or
> anything else, from files in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Is this a b
Me thinks it does body rules only.
I'm at 3.2.3 and it (sa-compile) definitely picks up my rules.
FWIW,
Jared Hall
General Telecom, LLC.
On Friday 14 September 2007 15:54, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> sa-compile appears to examine rules downloaded via sa-update, including
> custom channels like dostec
sa-compile appears to examine rules downloaded via sa-update, including custom
channels like dostech. However, it does not appear to pick up custom rules, or
anything else, from files in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Is this a bug or a
feature?
Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED
From: "Dean Clapper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 9:38 AM
Is there a configuration for spamassassin to catch virus
attachments? Or,
does any one know of one to run on a server with sendmail?
I use mimedefang http://www.mimedefang.org/ with sendmail,clamav and
SA. Gre
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
2007/9/12, Jon Trulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:07 PM Marc Perkel wrote:
The details are a little to complex for this forum ...
OK - had quite a few trolls here who seem t
I've been seeing these errors in my mail log. This is SpamAssassin version
3.2.3 running on Perl version 5.8.8. Installed via apt on debian/stable.
I've tried to `apt-get install --reinstall spamassassin spamc`, but that did
not work. Is this likely the result of a misconfiguration on my part or i
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:07:32 -0700, Jeff Shepherd
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> My my - I criticize one of the noise makers by pointing out the
> >> meta-troll's silliness so Marc responds by blacklisting me. This is
> >> getting interesting in a psychological sense.
> >>
> >> {^_-}I'm still
>> My my - I criticize one of the noise makers by pointing out the
>> meta-troll's silliness so Marc responds by blacklisting me. This is
>> getting interesting in a psychological sense.
>>
>> {^_-}I'm still giggling over it.
He he, at the rate he's going, he'll have the whole list blacklist
Here are some sites:
www.dnsstuff.com
http://www.mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx
Josie~
-Original Message-
From: François Rousseau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 9:41 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Objective site to run spamcheck against?
On 9/14/07 7:38 AM, "Dean Clapper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a configuration for spamassassin to catch virus attachments? Or,
> does any one know of one to run on a server with sendmail?
>
> thanks
> Dean
>
This has worked well for me. We have our spam emails tagged in the su
I use ClamAv plugin for SpamAssassin and I have add a rules in my
milter to discard every infected email.
For the plugin part: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ClamAVPlugin
François Rousseau
2007/9/14, Randal, Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dean,
>
> Check out MailScanner - http://www.mailscanne
Dean,
Check out MailScanner - http://www.mailscanner.info
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Dean Clapper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 September 2007 14:39
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject
If you don t want to search:
http://www.robtex.com/rbl.html and http://www.dnsstuff.com/ .
2007/9/14, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > An inordinate amount of people are telling me I'm
> > ending up in spam folders, so I wondered if there was
> >
Is there a configuration for spamassassin to catch virus attachments? Or,
does any one know of one to run on a server with sendmail?
thanks
Dean
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An inordinate amount of people are telling me I'm
> ending up in spam folders, so I wondered if there was
> some "objective" site where I might be able to run a
> message through and have it score an email. I realize this
> could also be used by spammers t
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
> Sure, some messages will bail out faster, but most messages will take
> much longer to scan. How is that better?
>
> I don't debate that the basic idea of having SA do this "automagically"
> would be a great thing. However, the reality of doing it efficiently is
> much
Justin Mason wrote:
Pawel Sasin writes:
Hi,
my co-worker has come accross some interesting articles (links below)
about hardware accelerated regexp matching (using specialised hardware
or even popular PCI Express GPU cards). Has anyone thought about using
this in SA? The benchmarks done usin
Pawel Sasin writes:
> Hi,
>
> my co-worker has come accross some interesting articles (links below)
> about hardware accelerated regexp matching (using specialised hardware
> or even popular PCI Express GPU cards). Has anyone thought about using
> this in SA? The benchmarks done using Kaspersk
Hi,
my co-worker has come accross some interesting articles (links below)
about hardware accelerated regexp matching (using specialised hardware
or even popular PCI Express GPU cards). Has anyone thought about using
this in SA? The benchmarks done using Kaspersky AV are very promising...
SA c
I own a couple of domains that are hosted on a shared hosting setup, for
which I don't have shell access but do have cPanel access.
For quite a while SA was working nicely, but recently it appears to have
stopped filtering many mails. The reason I am saying this is that mails are
arriving in my
26 matches
Mail list logo
