Ray Dzek wrote:
Just as a side note...
I am a charter customer. I have spoken with their techincal assistance
many times, and at various levels, for myself and on behalf of others I
have tried to assist. They are by far the most incompetent ISP I have
ever dealt with. They only have one answe
Linooks wrote:
> I have it working!
>
> added the email address that sends newsletters in simcontrol
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> But I have another last problem.
> I get a spam with an email within my domain? lets say
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <--- sends out spam messages to all
>
> Can someone please t
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I would like to know if there already rule exist. Parsing receive
> headers check HELO existing in DNS and if not increase score.
> Checked docs for SA and found only eval:check_rbl and this is seems
> not what I'm need at all, correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>
AFAIK
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
>
> I went for the report_safe 0 option but what I would really like to get is
> also the spam YES/NO flag in it.
>
> I have X-Spam-Score: 22.7 (++)
> X-Spam-Report - rather lengthy description of why the email was classified
> as such but no X-Spam-Statu
Jonn R Taylor wrote on Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:30:22 -0500:
> What even more
> interesting is that they block 25 out going. So I am not sure why we all
> see so much spam from them.
The spam is comming from *.dhcp.*.*.charter.com. Obviously, there's no such
blockage. I reject everything from there
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 06:58:23AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, but clearly in http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/ there are
> plenty of fresh August 2007 updates, but constant loser me is stuck with
> 556472.tar.gz 15-Jul-2007
Yes, there are other updates in the channel that are newer
TVD> All that means is that when in doubt, once a day is probably a good
frequency
OK, but clearly in http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/ there are
plenty of fresh August 2007 updates, but constant loser me is stuck with
556472.tar.gz 15-Jul-2007
So what version of spamassassin do I have to i
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 05:50:02AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gentlemen, what's the deal. I installed the latest version of
> spamassassin, and http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates says
> run sa-update once a day, and I do, and always I see
You're picking and choosing what you ta
DA> I used IP::Country::Fast to block everything except canada and usa...
DA> I've only had to add one company to an allow list because they are in
Italy...
DA> I don't think its that bad of a solution,
DA> depending on where your companies customers are located..
And no wonder you don't seem
Gentlemen, what's the deal. I installed the latest version of
spamassassin, and http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates says
run sa-update once a day, and I do, and always I see
>> channel: current version is 556472, new version is 556472, skipping channel
Upon further investigation (whic
Question: any way to post a message to this list via email and since I
read this list via Gmane, not be sent needless copies of all mail
posted to this list? I don't want a Nabble account either.
j> http://www.ezmlm.org/ezman/ezman1.html says after long research,
j> "To temporarily leave an ezmlm
Thanks.
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:43:17PM -0700, Linooks wrote:
>> >> let say the email address is:
>> >>
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >> it send spam messages and it isn't filtered by SA.
>> >>
>> >> Why?
>> >>
>> >> can I do something about this?
>
> SA
Thanks! i will check..
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote:
>
>> this is the full header:
>>
>> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Received: (qmail 18837 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2007 19:45:01 -
>> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote:
> this is the full header:
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 18837 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2007 19:45:01 -
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 18801 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2007
Hi list,
I would like to know if there already rule exist. Parsing receive
headers check HELO existing in DNS and if not increase score.
Checked docs for SA and found only eval:check_rbl and this is seems not
what I'm need at all, correct me if I'm wrong.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:43:17PM -0700, Linooks wrote:
> >> let say the email address is:
> >>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> it send spam messages and it isn't filtered by SA.
> >>
> >> Why?
> >>
> >> can I do something about this?
SA processes all mails sent to it(*), so if mails aren't
this is the full header:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 18837 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2007 19:45:01 -
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 18801 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2007 19:45:01 -
Received: from unknown (HELO pcsp22
I dont have whitelist option in my local.cf file, I even added blacklist_to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but to no avail.
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>> let say the email address is:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> it send spam messages and it isn't filtered by SA.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> can I do something abo
> let say the email address is:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> it send spam messages and it isn't filtered by SA.
>
> Why?
>
> can I do something about this?
>
>
> thanks in advance!!!
The one and only reason to this is that you have whitelisted your own domain in
your MTA, or by writing "whitel
I'm a little late stepping in on this and it seems the original email
was deleted from my mail box by mistake. As everyone has saids, yes you
can use spam assassin on a separate server. I do that right now and it
works pretty well. It's also pretty slick because I have it setup not
only to filt
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote:
> I had no whitelist option in my local.cf so I think that is not
> the cause.
>
> Hmm,, I really wonder why.
Please post a sample including all headers, if you can.
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote:
> >
> >> But I have another last problem.
> >> I get
I had no whitelist option in my local.cf so I think that is not the cause.
Hmm,, I really wonder why.
thanks though!
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote:
>
>> But I have another last problem.
>> I get a spam with an email within my domain? lets say
>> [EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Linooks wrote:
> But I have another last problem.
> I get a spam with an email within my domain? lets say
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <--- sends out spam messages to all
>
> Can someone please tell how to solve this one? thanks in advance!!!
You mean it's not blocking spams that hav
let say the email address is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it send spam messages and it isn't filtered by SA.
Why?
can I do something about this?
thanks in advance!!!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/recieving-spam-from-my-own-domain--tf4324937.html#a12317128
Sent from the Spam
I doubt that spammers have gotten sophisticated enough to have lists of
of Middle Eastern names with US-based addresses. There's something else
going on, methinks.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/24/2007 1:27 PM >>>
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 12:38 -0400, Rick Zeman wrote:
> That looks like a perfectly val
I have it working!
added the email address that sends newsletters in simcontrol
Thanks for the help.
But I have another last problem.
I get a spam with an email within my domain? lets say
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <--- sends out spam messages to all
Can someone please tell how to solve this one? thank
That looks like a perfectly valid non-spam AOL email.
You think? The user claims they do not know them, the recipients all in
aol.com except my user (snipped) and got three in a row...another
here...
I think that is a newish user that is getting a ton of spam from joe-jobbed
From: names, and
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 12:38 -0400, Rick Zeman wrote:
> That looks like a perfectly valid non-spam AOL email.
You think? The user claims they do not know them, the recipients all in
aol.com except my user (snipped) and got three in a row...another
here...
http://esmtp.webtent.net/mail2.txt
--
R
This morning on one of our servers, spamd was having problems. There
were 8 spamd children running, but "top" showed only two of them were
using any CPU time even though there was a backlog of messages to be
processed. The log file included lines like this:
Aug 24 08:49:22 localhost spamd[21051]
Just as a side note...
I am a charter customer. I have spoken with their techincal assistance
many times, and at various levels, for myself and on behalf of others I
have tried to assist. They are by far the most incompetent ISP I have
ever dealt with. They only have one answer for everything,
Hi,
while I do not keep these paypal things, I am quite sure that at most one mail
in 20 has my
address in the To field (or, maybe, has ANY address in the To field)
Wolfgang Hamann
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 06:48 -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> > Anyone seen these, first reported to us today, but a lot...can
> > they be stopped. Bayes even gives negative score...we are running
> > SA 3.2.1 with SARE rules, Botnet, KAM, chickenpo
I am looking for information about the use of Spamassasin with Ipower
website hosting, are there any users out there with this setup.
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 08:58 +0100, Martin.Hepworth wrote:
Botnet 0.8 is a lot better than 0.7 - please upgrade if you don't already.
How do you tell what version you have? I cannot find it anywhere in the
files, so I downloaded 0.8 and diff'd the pm against what I ha
Dear Matt and others,
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:53:19 -0400, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Using SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.1. I added report_header and
>> use_terse_report to local.cf but when restarting spamd, I got
> information
>> that sa cannot parse these options. Are these
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 08:58 +0100, Martin.Hepworth wrote:
> Botnet 0.8 is a lot better than 0.7 - please upgrade if you don't already.
>
How do you tell what version you have? I cannot find it anywhere in the
files, so I downloaded 0.8 and diff'd the pm against what I have and no
differences. I g
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Anyone seen these, first reported to us today, but a lot...can
> they be stopped. Bayes even gives negative score...we are running
> SA 3.2.1 with SARE rules, Botnet, KAM, chickenpox...
>
> http://esmtp.webtent.net/mail1.txt
Hrm. About the only us
Has anybody out there setup spamassasin with the Ipower webhosting setup. I
am looking for information about how the software interacts and what kind of
setup that one can do.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ipower-webhosting-spamassasin-tf4323650.html#a12312625
Sent from
Anyone seen these, first reported to us today, but a lot...can they be
stopped. Bayes even gives negative score...we are running SA 3.2.1 with
SARE rules, Botnet, KAM, chickenpox...
http://esmtp.webtent.net/mail1.txt
Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.1. I added report_header and
> use_terse_report to local.cf but when restarting spamd, I got information
> that sa cannot parse these options. Are these options obsolete or should
> they be placed elsewhere?
>
>
Actually,
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.1. I added report_header and
> use_terse_report to local.cf but when restarting spamd, I got information
> that sa cannot parse these options. Are these options obsolete or should
> they be placed elsewhere?
Obsolete, as of
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:59:11 -0400:
I think it's a brain-dead attempt to counter the image and pdf
spams that have been so popular lately.
It would be nice if they would block their outgoing spam in the same
effective way. They are among the biggest spa
On 24.08.07 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> imagin a newsletters or order mail sent by an seller website with the
> from address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have in my mail system an address like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> With that, I can trace where my emails are sent in order to trace spam
> and sit
Invoke method : UsedViaProcmail
Version : 3.1.9 (2007-02-13)
Platform : Linux Fedora 2.6.20-1.2925.fc6
Hello,
imagin a newsletters or order mail sent by an seller website with the
from address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have in my mail system an address like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With that, I can trace
Hello,
Using SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.1. I added report_header and
use_terse_report to local.cf but when restarting spamd, I got information
that sa cannot parse these options. Are these options obsolete or should
they be placed elsewhere?
Thank you!
Zbigniew Szalbot
Matt Kettler wrote on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:59:11 -0400:
> I think it's a brain-dead attempt to counter the image and pdf
> spams that have been so popular lately.
It would be nice if they would block their outgoing spam in the same
effective way. They are among the biggest spam sources for us.
K
46 matches
Mail list logo
