Hi There,
I am getting a HUGE amount of Spam which basically states that a Friend,
Collegue, Worshipper, Fan, etc has sent me an eCard...
This is happening to a number of my clients as well...
I want to beef up SpamAssassin and get it up to date so that it can tag
incoming spam better... curren
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 at 20:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Thanks for that. Spamd hadn't started. There was an error in the local.cf
file. It looks liek some of the other software I installed modified it.
Thanks for the pointers - it should've been the first place I looked.
Anybody ha
Thanks for that. Spamd hadn't started. There was an error in the local.cf
file. It looks liek some of the other software I installed modified it.
Thanks for the pointers - it should've been the first place I looked.
Anybody have any experience with Communigate Pro and CGPSA. I'm now having
troub
Sparecreative wrote:
> I've just installed SA 3.2.2 and the installation went fine with no errors.
> Then when I tried to invoke it via a rule in Communigate Pro it fails. I
> checked the logs and this is what I see:
>
> Aug 8 00:22:54 SpareServer spamc[12563]: connect to spamd on 127.0.0.1
> fail
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 18:01 -0700, Sparecreative wrote:
> I've just installed SA 3.2.2 and the installation went fine with no errors.
> Then when I tried to invoke it via a rule in Communigate Pro it fails. I
> checked the logs and this is what I see:
>
> Aug 8 00:22:54 SpareServer spamc[12563]:
Are you sure there is spamd process running on the same host calling this?
Looks that there is not.
> I've just installed SA 3.2.2 and the installation went
> fine with no errors. Then when I tried to invoke it via a
> rule in Communigate Pro it fails. I checked the logs and
> this is what I se
I've just installed SA 3.2.2 and the installation went fine with no errors.
Then when I tried to invoke it via a rule in Communigate Pro it fails. I
checked the logs and this is what I see:
Aug 8 00:22:54 SpareServer spamc[12563]: connect to spamd on 127.0.0.1
failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connect
- Original Message -
From: "Stein Magne Bjorklund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Worobcuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: spamd is invoked 3 times / forgot the subject
On 8/7/07, Michael Worobcuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am runnin
Hi for all, this is mi first messagge to the list, thanks for your time and
sorry for my English (I'm Spanish) ;-)
My problem is this:
I would like have a first server with postfix and spamassassin only for check
spam an virus (with clamd) and relay the mail to the optimum server with a
privat
On 8/7/07, Michael Worobcuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running SpamAssassin-3.2.1_1 on FreeBSD.
> My MTA is Exim.
>
> My problem is that spamd seems to be invoked 3 times by exim.
Cant really help you as my Exim/Spamassassin is also broken at the
moment. I have problem running spamc o
On 06/08/07 12:52, Rob Sterenborg wrote:
> ... I'm wondering: when exactly does an email
> hit this rule?
>
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5485
--
Dave Mifsud
Systems Engineer
Computing Services Centre
University of Malta
CSC Tel: (+356) 2340 3004 CSC Fax: (+356) 2
My first posting to the list gave me an error, so sorry if this causes
a dbl post.
Spamassassin have stopped working, when I dont know, or way
So I updateded Spamassassin in hope that is may solve it self.
Installed from CPAN the latest version (3.2.2) but the problem still
remain. it IS SCANN
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> Is it possible to get zone transfers of the iXhash data?
According to an email they sent some weeks ago, only to people using a
BIND9-Slave (IXFR) and running it as a public service.
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:50:22AM -0700, niss wrote:
> Starting spamd: HTML::Parser object version 3.26 does not match bootstrap
> parameter 3.56 at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/XSLoader.pm
> line 106.
You have two different versions of HTML::Parser installed.
> It seems like eve
Larry M. Rosenbaum wrote on Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:21:14 -0400:
> Is it possible to get zone transfers of the iXhash data?
Ask them.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Is it possible to get zone transfers of the iXhash data?
I help administer our linux mail server. We are running red hat 9. After
editing the manual whitelist, I tried to restart spamd and got this error
message.
Starting spamd: HTML::Parser object version 3.26 does not match bootstrap
parameter 3.56 at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/XSL
At 02:18 07-08-2007, John Andersen wrote:
All it contains is 6 digit numbers. What's up with that stuff?
Address verification.
Test for missing message-id and "QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
7.1.0.9" as the X-Mailer.
Regards,
-sm
Mark Sansome wrote:
I am trying to run SA site-wide. That sounds far grander than it
actually is. I am running fetchmail -> procmail -> clamav -> SA on a FC6
platform which acts as a server for my home system.
What I am trying to achieve is as follows:
fetchmail scoops up all the mail for all th
Nice try, but no banana... :)
I cleared out the sare rules when I switched from RDJ to sa-update.
Both of these errors only show when I am trying to use the compiled
rules. If I comment out the Rule2XSBody plugin, I don't see the errors.
Bowie
Randal, Phil wrote:
> My guess is that you have
My guess is that you have copies of the sare rules in both
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002001/ and /etc/mail/spamassassin.
Clear them out from the latter.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EM
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> After running sa-compile and un-commenting the plugin, everything
> seems
> to be working. There are no lint errors and it is scoring mail. But
> when I look in the logs, I noticed some errors like this:
>
> Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_neg950.pm in
On 8/7/2007 4:34 PM, Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:52:25PM +0100, UxBoD wrote:
This appears to work okay :-
header __LOCAL_PROBE1 subject =~ /[0-9]{4,6}/i
body__LOCAL_PROBE2 /([a-z|0-9]{8})/i
describeLOCAL_PROBE1Daft N
Yes I know :( has been pointed out to me so has been revised :-
header __LOCAL_DIG1subject =~ /^\d[0-9]{4,6}$/
body__LOCAL_DIG2/^([a-f|0-9]{8})$/i
describeLOCAL_DIG1 Daft Number Scam
metaLOCAL_DIG1 __LOCAL_D
Yes, re2c is installed.
$ re2c -v
re2c 0.13.0
Bowie
Randal, Phil wrote:
> Do you have re2c installed?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 07 August 2007 15:16
> > To: Spamassassin List (E-mail)
> > Subjec
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:07:23PM +0200, Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
> Is it possible to make the logging more verbose and to add the scores
> beside the names like it is done my mailscanner on another machine?
There is no verbosity option for the logging, you get what you get. So you
could change
Do you have re2c installed?
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 August 2007 15:16
> To: Spamassassin List (E-mail)
> Subject: Error after compiling rules
>
> Af
I am trying to run SA site-wide. That sounds far grander than it
actually is. I am running fetchmail -> procmail -> clamav -> SA on a FC6
platform which acts as a server for my home system.
What I am trying to achieve is as follows:
fetchmail scoops up all the mail for all the various POP3 account
After running sa-compile and un-commenting the plugin, everything seems
to be working. There are no lint errors and it is scoring mail. But
when I look in the logs, I noticed some errors like this:
Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_neg950.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: /var/lib/spa
This appears to work okay :-
header __LOCAL_PROBE1 subject =~ /[0-9]{4,6}/i
body__LOCAL_PROBE2 /([a-z|0-9]{8})/i
describeLOCAL_PROBE1Daft Number Probe
metaLOCAL_PROBE1(__LOCAL_PROBE1 + __LOCAL_PROBE2 > 1)
score
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 12:14:31PM +0200, Chr. v. Stuckrad wrote:
>
> My most paranoid guess is:
>
> - Cause: we have summer vacation time ...
>
> So LOTS of people are on holidays.
> If you use E-Mails with totally useless content which goes
> through all filters for a short time, you can trigg
Hi!
We're using spamd on Debian Sarge.
Logging in /var/log/mail.log looks like:
Aug 7 14:49:35 admin05 spamd[31778]: spamd: result: Y 29 -
BAYES_99,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,FB_B0NUS,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_BASE
64_NO_NAME,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2
_CF_RANGE_
Kai,
> Mark Martinec wrote on Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:22:22 +0200:
> > Domains which choose a default policy are not required to publish
> > a policy (or SSP) record. Penalizing them for choosing not
> > to explicitly publish what is a default anyway, would be unjust.
> I think that's not the point.
I agree..Is there any other reason U can see?
--
Chaitu
"Linux means productivity and fun. NT means 'Not Today'."
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:46 +0300, Henrik Krohns wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:13:03PM +0530, Chaitu wrote:
> > Bayesian Poisoning..
>
> ...is a myth.
Bayesian Poisoning..
Chaitu
"The Heart of the Cosmos is DUALITY...A balance of Antitheses, the cycle
of Life and Death."
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 01:18 -0800, John Andersen wrote:
> Ok, what is this stuff.
> All it contains is 6 digit numbers. What's up with that stuff?
John D. Hardin wrote on Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:45:45 -0700 (PPT):
> Why not just script the release process to copy the relevant
> files to a temp directory and tar that?
or that ;-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Mark Martinec wrote on Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:22:22 +0200:
> Domains which choose a default policy are not required to publish
> a policy (or SSP) record. Penalizing them for choosing not
> to explicitly publish what is a default anyway, would be unjust.
I think that's not the point. The point is to
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, John Andersen wrote:
> Ok, what is this stuff.
> All it contains is 6 digit numbers. What's up with that stuff?
My most paranoid guess is:
- Cause: we have summer vacation time ...
So LOTS of people are on holidays.
If you use E-Mails with totally useless content which go
Ok, what is this stuff.
All it contains is 6 digit numbers. What's up with that stuff?
--
_
John Andersen
Dan,
> > Yes, this is normal. An absence of a policy record implies
> > a default policy, which is a neutral 'signs some mail'.
>
> True, but perhaps, SA could hit a different rule when encountering the
> EXPLICIT "signsome" policy versus the IMPLICIT, i.e.
> DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME_DEFAULT or somethin
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
Rob,
When the domainkey policy record for the domain in question says the
domain signs some of its email.
Heheh.. Yeah, I guessed that much, but, we *don't* sign email. Not
DK(IM) or anything else.
Yes, this is normal. An absence of a policy record
Hi,
I am running SpamAssassin-3.2.1_1 on FreeBSD.
My MTA is Exim.
My problem is that spamd seems to be invoked 3 times by exim.
Here is an excerpt of my mysql-query-log:
9102 Connect [EMAIL PROTECTED] on spamassassin
9102 Query set autocommit=1
Hi,
I am running SpamAssassin-3.2.1_1 on FreeBSD.
My MTA is Exim.
My problem is that spamd seems to be invoked 3 times by exim.
Here is an excerpt of my mysql-query-log:
9102 Connect [EMAIL PROTECTED] on spamassassin
9102 Query set autocommit=1
43 matches
Mail list logo
