Re: zip spams

2007-08-02 Thread wolfgang
In an older episode (Friday, 3. August 2007 01:46), Theo Van Dinter wrote: > BTW: full rules are horrible. You want mimeheader (and the > MIMEheader plugin), part of the standard distribution. Thanks for the info! wolfgang

RE: Please(don't) remove this bozo if you can figure out which he is

2007-08-02 Thread Michael Scheidell
Idiot, at least read the thread before commenting on something a month old. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO SECNAP Network Security Corporation Keep up to date with latest information on IT security: Real time security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news ___

Re: Please(don't) remove this bozo if you can figure out which he is

2007-08-02 Thread Jo Rhett
Michael Scheidell wrote: I suppose spamassassin.apache.org should be listed in the blacklist for sending this email to his secondary (according some some people who obviously don't understand how the real world works) I'm sorry, perhaps you can clarify your statement. Are you suggesting that

Re: zip spams

2007-08-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:37:45AM +0200, wolfgang wrote: > > > like to know how can I write a spamassassin rule to assign a score > > > to just having a zip attachment. > > > > fullLOCAL_ZIP_ATT m/Content-(?:Disposition|Type).{1,40} > > (name=\"?.{1,50}\.)?zip\"?/is BTW: full rules ar

Re: UCE from cloudmark.com

2007-08-02 Thread Duane Hill
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 at 13:45 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Greetings, Is anyone else getting these UCE messages? I received one message myself. I completely overlooked it as being spam based on the fact I had dealt with a product they had/have. --- _|_ (_| |

Re: installing patch

2007-08-02 Thread snowcrash+sa
atm, you need to patch the source, and rebuild ... e.g., cd /top/of/fresh/src/tree/for/spamassassin wget -k -O bug5574_patch4077.patch "http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4077&action=view"; patch -p0 < bug5574_patch4077.patch config, build & install fwiw, works peachy-keen w

installing patch

2007-08-02 Thread Chris
I guess I'm going to have to show how dumb I am here, but how does one apply the patch that has been mentioned to take care of the Pyzor and DCC problem? First of all, where is the MANIFEST file mentioned? Secondly, I have a Util.pm located here /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin, b

Re: zip spams

2007-08-02 Thread wolfgang
In an older episode (Thursday, 2. August 2007 08:22), wolfgang wrote: > > I would > > like to know how can I write a spamassassin rule to assign a score > > to just having a zip attachment. > > Try something like > > fullLOCAL_ZIP_ATT m/Content-(?:Disposition|Type).{1,40} > (name=\"?.{1

Re: amavisd & sa not loading plugins?

2007-08-02 Thread Gary V
Plugins aren't automatically loaded, you have to have a "loadplugin" line in a *.pre file. Oh that's right. I totally forgot about that. Whoops. My bad. Somewhat related: search for: added a global configuration variable @additional_perl_modules in: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/releas

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Raquel
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT) User for SpamAssassin Mail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > We are running a Debian Sarge system here with spamassassin > version Version: 3.0.3-2sarge1. > > I tried to put these plugins (ImageInfo and loadplugin) into my > system and got th

Re: amavisd & sa not loading plugins?

2007-08-02 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:27:55PM -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote: I tried dumping the PDFInfo.pm plugin there, but it's still not loading it. I also have a copy in /etc/mail/spamassassin along with the cf file, but no dice so far. Plugins aren't automatically loaded, yo

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread User for SpamAssassin Mail List
As a follow up. I found a Logger.pm on the system but it was not in the "/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/" directory. I did find one in the "/usr/share/perl5/Razor2" directory. I made copy of this Logger.pm file and placed it in the "Mail/SpamAssassin/" directory like it was looking for in the

Re: amavisd & sa not loading plugins?

2007-08-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:27:55PM -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote: > I tried dumping the PDFInfo.pm plugin there, but it's still not loading > it. I also have a copy in /etc/mail/spamassassin along with the cf file, > but no dice so far. Plugins aren't automatically loaded, you have to have a "lo

amavisd & sa not loading plugins?

2007-08-02 Thread Jonathan Nichols
My logs show this: Aug 2 12:22:43 mailgate amavis[2883]: (02883-01) extra modules loaded: Mail/SpamAssassin/Locales.pm, Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm, Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/BodyEval.pm, Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Check.pm, Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DNSEval.pm, Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/H

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread User for SpamAssassin Mail List
Hello, We are running a Debian Sarge system here with spamassassin version Version: 3.0.3-2sarge1. I tried to put these plugins (ImageInfo and loadplugin) into my system and got the following errors when I restarted: Aug 2 12:

Re: which 'other' rules can/should be sa-compiled?

2007-08-02 Thread snowcrash+sa
got it. rats!, nonetheless... thx!

Re: RulesDuJour/deneb.dwf.com: 404 errors

2007-08-02 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:25 -0600, Reg Clemens wrote: > I am getting the following error message from my (daily) update of > SpamAssassin > Rules > > --- > > Subject: RulesDuJour/deneb.dwf.com: 404 errors > > > > The following rules had errors: > SARE 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf Ruleset had a

Re: RDJ "autoban"

2007-08-02 Thread SARE Webmaster
Jonathan Nichols wrote: I'm still seeing this when I run RDJ manually. I'm not running it from cron and it's been disabled for weeks. yes, I emailed the address noted in the error. :) [11915] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: AUTOBAN: Over 500 *.cf requests in 48 hours period - C

RulesDuJour/deneb.dwf.com: 404 errors

2007-08-02 Thread Reg Clemens
I am getting the following error message from my (daily) update of SpamAssassin Rules --- Subject: RulesDuJour/deneb.dwf.com: 404 errors The following rules had errors: SARE 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf Ruleset had an unknown error: curl exit code: 52 curl: (52) Empty reply from server 000 ---

Re: which 'other' rules can/should be sa-compiled?

2007-08-02 Thread Justin Mason
snowcrash+sa writes: > i currently use a cron job to > > sa-update --channelfile /usr/local/etc/sa/update-DIST-ch.conf > sa-update --channelfile /usr/local/etc/sa/update-SARE-ch.conf > > pulling updates, as available, into my system-wide rules update directory. > > if updates exist, then i

UCE from cloudmark.com

2007-08-02 Thread Martin G. Diehl
Greetings, Is anyone else getting these UCE messages? MGD Original Message Subject:spam assassin / Razor Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:04:19 -0700 From: Matt Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Martin, I’m reaching out to all existing Razor users,

Re: 3.2.1 RDNS_NONE bug/false positive

2007-08-02 Thread Matthew Yette
This bug exists on a qmail-1.03 install as well. >>> On 8/2/2007 at 12:40 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Rudd <[EMAIL >>> PROTECTED]> wrote: The following received header gets RDNS_NONE: Received: from [69.12.154.165] (HELO mail.rudd.cc) by some.internal.test.host (CommuniGate Pro

which 'other' rules can/should be sa-compiled?

2007-08-02 Thread snowcrash+sa
i currently use a cron job to sa-update --channelfile /usr/local/etc/sa/update-DIST-ch.conf sa-update --channelfile /usr/local/etc/sa/update-SARE-ch.conf pulling updates, as available, into my system-wide rules update directory. if updates exist, then i compile them, sa-compile --su

Re: 3.2.1 RDNS_NONE bug/false positive

2007-08-02 Thread Justin Mason
John, could you open this as a bug in bugzilla? John Rudd writes: > > > The following received header gets RDNS_NONE: > > Received: from [69.12.154.165] (HELO mail.rudd.cc) >by some.internal.test.host (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) >with ESMTP id 60056 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 31 Jul

3.2.1 RDNS_NONE bug/false positive

2007-08-02 Thread John Rudd
The following received header gets RDNS_NONE: Received: from [69.12.154.165] (HELO mail.rudd.cc) by some.internal.test.host (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 60056 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:05:04 -0700 This is an error in the RDNS_NONE logic. The host in que

Re: I have a probleme with my content analysis

2007-08-02 Thread James Wilkinson
lochness wrote: > > I'm running on windows and i'm using one software call "NoSpamtoday" that > software is based on spamassassin I modify local.cf file but in my test I > have this message bellow I put required_hits on 5 but in the message I have > 0 so how can I apply my config NoSpamToday puts

Re: Creating rule with .and. operator...

2007-08-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:52:49PM -0300, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > How can I create a rule to match no-spam e-mail with have (both) > words "hello" and "testing" (body or hearder) > > I tried to use: > > /hello&testing/i > /hello&&testing/i > /hello && testing/i These are regular express

Re: Short circuit question / feature request

2007-08-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:38:53PM +0100, neil wrote: > I didnt see anything in the perldoc, but I have heard the idea some > where. Is this possible? Is is a feature that the devs know about? > Should I raise it as a feature request? I'm still rather annoyed about this whole thing, but you can

Creating rule with .and. operator...

2007-08-02 Thread Rejaine Monteiro
Hi, How can I create a rule to match no-spam e-mail with have (both) words "hello" and "testing" (body or hearder) I tried to use: /hello&testing/i /hello&&testing/i /hello && testing/i but not working... I need to match messages with have hello and testing in any position, like

Re: Huge server load problem with Exim and SpamAssassin

2007-08-02 Thread Diego H.
It´s working now! As i posted before. No more 120mb> spamd childs, now they are at 28-30mb of RES size. David Baron wrote: > > In a "split" configuration, where would these warn sets be placed? > The sections of the combined "exim4.conf.template" also correspond to the > individual files for

Short circuit question / feature request

2007-08-02 Thread neil
Hi; With short circuit you can stop scanning when certain tests are met. Eg user is whitelisted. I'm seeing lots of spam with scores (50+ points) above my cut off and reject score. Is there a way for shortcircuit to see the current score and stop if it is above a certain cut off ? I don't

Re: Huge server load problem with Exim and SpamAssassin

2007-08-02 Thread David Baron
In a "split" configuration, where would these warn sets be placed? The sections of the combined "exim4.conf.template" also correspond to the individual files for splits. So ... where did you do this? Note that I am not using the 850_exim4-config_spamcheck_router but currently using procmail to r

Re: Huge server load problem with Exim and SpamAssassin

2007-08-02 Thread Diego H.
Sorry for the caps! In my config should be like this, Im not very experienced in exim rules: warn condition = ${if <={$message_size}{200K}} condition = ${if eq {${acl_m0}}{1}{1}{0}} spam = ${acl_m1}/defer_ok log_message = "SpamAssassin as ${acl_m1} detected message as spam"

Re: Huge server load problem with Exim and SpamAssassin

2007-08-02 Thread Magnus Holmgren
Please do not abuse the subject line with excessive capitals and exclamation marks. On Thursday 02 August 2007 15:14, Diego H. wrote: > Below is my spamassassin rules at exim, seems that SA is scanning > everything and I want to limit the scanning size up to 100k, no more. I > read that there is

Re: .htm spam files

2007-08-02 Thread John D. Hardin
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sg wrote: > .htm is a attaching file. We are using 3.1.7 version. We didnt > configure anything, default configurations only. Please keep this on-list so that others can help as well. Please post a complete copy of the spam email on a webserver somewhere so that we can look a

Re: spamassassin gets stucked in

2007-08-02 Thread Diego H.
Try to upgrade to SA 3.2.2. there was a fix for messages that take too long for scan. Néher Márton wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all! > > I would like to ask for your help about an sa problem. > Somethimes (random or when a lots of mails arrive) some spamd

spamassassin gets stucked in

2007-08-02 Thread Néher Márton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! I would like to ask for your help about an sa problem. Somethimes (random or when a lots of mails arrive) some spamd children gets stucked in, what pushes up the load (~40), and enormously eats memory (~6-7Gb). It started about 1-2 weeks ago

HUGE SERVER LOAD PROBLEM I NEED HELP URGENT PLEASE!!!!!!!!!

2007-08-02 Thread Diego H.
Below is my spamassassin rules at exim, seems that SA is scanning everything and I want to limit the scanning size up to 100k, no more. I read that there is a rule called message_size but I dont know where to insert it in my config: Thanks in advance!! warn condition = ${if eq {${acl_m0}}{1}

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:15:21AM -0400, Michael W Cocke wrote: > These blasted PDF spams are driving me mad! Any ideas for a rule that > would trip if there's no text in the body, just a PDF attachment ? run sa-update. There's been a rule in the channel for a while now. -- Randomly Selected

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Diego Pomatta
Jeremy Fairbrass escribió: If you're using the PDFinfo plugin, you should see a rule called GMD_PDF_EMPTY_BODY on those spams - it should fire on any message containing a PDF and a blank body. Obviously you can modify that rule's score if you want to make it higher, or meta it with other rules.

spamd for a specific user generates 100% cpu load

2007-08-02 Thread FireMail
hi there, i configured my spamd that it scans all emails that go in and out. the then spawned spamd process is owned by the mailuser itself (in my case its mail008). The funny thing is, that everything runs fine with my other 500 spamd users / processes, but this single user creates an incredibl

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread MIKE YRABEDRA
Answer to my own question... #PDFInfo - tags pdf based spam # loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::PDFInfo /usr/local/saplugins/PDFInfo.pm :-) on 8/2/07 6:30 AM, MIKE YRABEDRA at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > on 8/2/07 5:55 AM, Justin Mason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> In my Debian et

Add senders email address and url in Report

2007-08-02 Thread Glenn Terjesen
Hi, What im trying to do: Add a url in spamassassin's "report" function. For example: ## clear_report_template report Spamassassin thinks this is spam report If you trust this email-address you can click on the link below. report http://www.whitelist.me/?emailaddress=_EMAIL_SENDER where _EMAILSE

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread MIKE YRABEDRA
on 8/2/07 5:55 AM, Justin Mason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> In my Debian etch installation it's >> /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/ > > actually, it's better not to use that location. That's where > SpamAssassin installs its distribution-packaged modules, and it > may delete the con

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread MIKE YRABEDRA
Probably a stupid question, but where do I put the PDFInfo.pm file? I put it is /etc/mail/plugins/... But that does not work. I will continue googling in the meantime on 8/2/07 5:09 AM, Michael W Cocke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks, both of you. Looks like an update to pdfinfo snuc

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Justin Mason
Sebastian Ries writes: > Hi > > > Excume my lack of knowlegde but where is the plugin directory for SA? > > > > I tried putting it in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/ > > then in /etc/mail and then in /usr/local/share/spamassassin > > > > When I restart spamd, it does not like when I put the pat

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Sebastian Ries
Hi > Excume my lack of knowlegde but where is the plugin directory for SA? > > I tried putting it in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/ > then in /etc/mail and then in /usr/local/share/spamassassin > > When I restart spamd, it does not like when I put the path to > /usr/local/share/spamassassin in

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello, Please ignore, have just found out the location. Sorry to have bothered! Zbigniew Szalbot On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:45:13 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:37:27 +0200 (CEST), Jeroen Tebbens > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Get

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello, On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:37:27 +0200 (CEST), Jeroen Tebbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Get the plugin PDFinfo > > http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins/ > > And it will give you more control about PDF spam. It has a rule for empty > body emails with PDF attachment (GMD_PDF_EMPTY_B

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Michael W Cocke
Thanks, both of you. Looks like an update to pdfinfo snuck out while I wasn't looking. I've made the adjustments. Mike- On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:39:20 +0200, you wrote: >"Michael W Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> These blasted PDF spams are driving me mad!

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Jeremy Fairbrass
"Michael W Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > These blasted PDF spams are driving me mad! Any ideas for a rule that > would trip if there's no text in the body, just a PDF attachment ? > > (I'm using the PDFinfo plugin now, but I don't really understand it) > > Th

Re: A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Jeroen Tebbens
Hi, Get the plugin PDFinfo http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins/ And it will give you more control about PDF spam. It has a rule for empty body emails with PDF attachment (GMD_PDF_EMPTY_BODY) and give it a score to your liking. /Jeroen On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Michael W Cocke wrote: These blas

A rule for empty body and pdf attachment??

2007-08-02 Thread Michael W Cocke
These blasted PDF spams are driving me mad! Any ideas for a rule that would trip if there's no text in the body, just a PDF attachment ? (I'm using the PDFinfo plugin now, but I don't really understand it) Thanks! Mike- -- If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough. -- Please note -

Re: Mail identified as spam forwarded to a different folder.

2007-08-02 Thread Michał Jęczalik
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Howard Rifkind wrote: We finally got SpamAssassin going with Squirrelmail. A number of message which spamassassin identified a spam has showen up in users mail boxes. Is there a way to get mail identified as spam to go to a seperate folder for each user? This is kind of li