At 06:10 07-07-2007, Tony Houghton wrote:
SA used to kill a different router I used to have, but I don't think
that's the problem here. I temporarily pointed /etc/resolv.conf to my
ISP's servers and restarted spamd, which you'd expect to make at least
some difference, but it didn't really. Beside
Hello all you block list provides,
I now have a new and better spam feed for those running block lists.
There's a new specification for automated reporting of spam.
http://www.mipassoc.org/arf/
I wrote a little Pascal program to do this spec and can now forward spam
as an attachment. I'm now
At 06:10 07-07-2007, Tony Houghton wrote:
SA used to kill a different router I used to have, but I don't think
that's the problem here. I temporarily pointed /etc/resolv.conf to my
ISP's servers and restarted spamd, which you'd expect to make at least
some difference, but it didn't really. Beside
Tony Houghton wrote:
> I switch my PC off overnight and I noticed the router would crash
> shortly after switching it back on and deduced it was because of the
> large volume of mail being fetched in one go. It was OK if I got my
> PC to use my ISP's DNS instead.
Strange. Frankly that just seems
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tony Houghton wrote:
> > SA used to kill a different router I used to have, but I don't think
> > that's the problem here.
>
> I don't see how even a low end router would have a problem with the
> amount of data from DNS lookups that could be generated.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill McGonigle wrote:
> I've seen plenty of spam hit the RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP rule and just recently
> noticed that the default score is only 0.23.
>
> My first impression is that if they're sending from an unassigned
> address then I ought to just cran
omehegan wrote:
> Any other thoughts on this? I got another 5-6 spams this morning that were
> scored 0 by Bayes. It's dragging down the hits from other rules!
I have seen this too when the volume of spam to learn from is much
larger than the volume of non-spam and the total quantity of learned
me
Tony Houghton wrote:
> SA used to kill a different router I used to have, but I don't think
> that's the problem here.
I don't see how even a low end router would have a problem with the
amount of data from DNS lookups that could be generated. It must have
been something else.
> I temporarily po
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been mentioned and I've missed it, but
I noted today that since upgrading from 3.2.0 to 3.2.1 bayes stopped
working, or rather, bayes started ignoring the username etc passed
from the local.cf.
Using bayes_sql_override_username has resolved the issue. My worry
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, SM wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> At 15:01 06-07-2007, Tony Houghton wrote:
> >I just use the one built in to my ADSL router; I don't know whether it
> >caches. The one it forwards to at my ISP is probably bind.
>
> The DNS server on your ADSL router is built for residential
> usage
FYI -- trunk/3.3.0 updates are now working.
Thanks :-)
Although, I think I'll also take earlier advice & 'stay here' (a stable &
working 3.2.x) for a bit.
--
Thanks,
JTDeLys
11 matches
Mail list logo