Unfortunately I'm not on the SpamAssassin Bayes modules -- I wrote my own
Bayes Engine because I wanted to do that and then thought about including
the Rules results from SpamAssassin. I don't know where this might be
going, but it seems to be working extremely well for me based on a
train
At 12:07 30-06-2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
someone is dual listed and can fix it.
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
There was a URL in
On Jun 30, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
And after typing all this I'm thinking you might be right. But
part of this approach is to run all these rules in YES/NO fashion
and see if the probability is significant. For example: If I
tested for SOME_TEST=NO and found it was sco
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:07:04PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
When in doubt, run through "spamassassin -D":
[9710] dbg: uridnsbl: domains to query: sync.pl svcolo.com
SA doesn't just look for full URLs, it looks for things that coul
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:22:36AM -0700, JP Kelly wrote:
> What is the best way to check what plugins SA is using?
Same as everything else, run "spamassassin -D --lint". :)
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"Internet exceeded user level, please wait until a user logs off before
attempting to log b
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
someone is dual listed and can fix it.
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
Begin forwarded message:
From: *snip*
Date: June 29,
Mikael Syska schrieb:
Kind a new to spam ... and especially how people use bayes.
So how many ham mails do you get per day ? wandering if I could do
something to my system so bayes may score higher
I have read some where that spam mails in bayes should be alot higher
than ham mails ... is
arni wrote:
[snip snap]
I looked for the lowest scoring email of the past 2 days (dont save
them longer), this is the one:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,DCC_CHECK,
DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME,HTML_MESSAGE,LOGINHASH1,LOGINHASH2,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY
autolearn=no
Just a thought - what if we had some central servers for real time
reporting where the SA rule hits and scores were reported in real time for
some sort of live scoring or analysis or dynamic adjusting? Just thinking
out loud here.
Something I've wanted to see for about 4 years now; ie: as long
And after typing all this I'm thinking you might be right. But part of
this approach is to run all these rules in YES/NO fashion and see if the
probability is significant. For example: If I tested for SOME_TEST=NO
and found it was scoring a probability of ~0.500 then it's indisputable
tha
On Jun 30, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
On 6/29/07, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The thought I had, and have been working on for a while, is changing
how the scoring is done. Rather than making Bayes a part of the
scoring process, make the scoring process a part of the B
OK - tell me if this is useful. I created a DNS list that you can pass a
host name to and get information as to where the registrar barrier is.
You can use it as follows:
dig .rb.junkemailfilter.com
Example:
dig perkel.com.rb.junkemailfilter.com - returns 127.0.0.1
dig perkel.co.uk.rb.junkemai
On 6/29/07, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The thought I had, and have been working on for a while, is changing
how the scoring is done. Rather than making Bayes a part of the
scoring process, make the scoring process a part of the Bayes
statistical Engine. As an example you would simp
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 at 19:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
OK, thanks.
I'm not using spamassassin or spamd.
I'm using Mail::SpamAssassin in a perl script.
What does '-x' do for Mail::SpamAssassin?
Nothing being you are calling SA directly from perl.
You should set dont_copy_prefs to
What is the best way to check what plugins SA is using?
Loren Wilton wrote:
You have a bit of a chicken and egg problem at the start. Until
some learning takes place in the system.
Two possibilities. The rules exist and have scores. Assume they are
maintained, for whatever reason.
1.Until Bayes has enough info to kick in, classification
Tom Allison wrote:
On Jun 30, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Tom Allison wrote:
For some years now there has been a lot of effective spam filtering
using statistical approaches with variations on Bayesian theory,
some of these are inverse Chi Square modifications to Niave Bayes or
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 07:07 -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> For configuration options listed in perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin can I
> put the settings into local.cf?
>
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf says yes, but it doesn't say it applies to
> args for Mail::SpamAssassin->new();
According to the perldoc
On Jun 30, 2007, at 8:07 AM, Loren Wilton wrote:
You have a bit of a chicken and egg problem at the start. Until
some learning takes place in the system.
Two possibilities. The rules exist and have scores. Assume they
are maintained, for whatever reason.
1.Until Bayes has enough
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:41:19AM -0700, CptanPanic wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I run spamc from my procmail on incoming messages. Does this mean that all
> messages are using root bayes_db?
No.
> If so why do the clients have stuff
> updated in their db in their home directories?
Because spamc (actu
Hello,
I run spamc from my procmail on incoming messages. Does this mean that all
messages are using root bayes_db? If so why do the clients have stuff
updated in their db in their home directories? I am trying to figure this
out so I can do sa-learn correctly.
Thanks,
CP
--
View this message
You have a bit of a chicken and egg problem at the start. Until
some learning takes place in the system.
Two possibilities. The rules exist and have scores. Assume they are
maintained, for whatever reason.
1.Until Bayes has enough info to kick in, classification is done by the
scores.
For configuration options listed in perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin can I
put the settings into local.cf?
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf says yes, but it doesn't say it applies to
args for Mail::SpamAssassin->new();
And what does 'save_pattern_hits' get me that I otherwise wouldn't have?
On Jun 30, 2007, at 4:46 AM, John Andersen wrote:
On Friday 29 June 2007, Tom Allison wrote:
It would be the Bayes process that determines the effective number of
points you assign for each HIT based on what it's learned about it
from you. So the tags of: ADVANCE_FEE_1, ADVANCE_FEE_2 would
On Jun 30, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Tom Allison wrote:
For some years now there has been a lot of effective spam
filtering using statistical approaches with variations on Bayesian
theory, some of these are inverse Chi Square modifications to
Niave Bayes or even CRM114 and o
On Friday 29 June 2007, Tom Allison wrote:
> It would be the Bayes process that determines the effective number of
> points you assign for each HIT based on what it's learned about it
> from you. So the tags of: ADVANCE_FEE_1, ADVANCE_FEE_2 would be
> represented as a token of format:
> ADVANCE_
26 matches
Mail list logo
