Thank you friends for your valuable inputs.
Diptanjan
Matthias Haegele-2 wrote:
>
> diptanjan schrieb:
>> Hi Friends,
>
> Hi!
>
>> My question is, I am using update.spamassassin.org as well as other
>> sources
>> to update my rules.
>> Is it possible default rules from update.spamassassin.o
I happened to notice that I had the above plugin uncommented in v312.pre and
v320.pre. I haven't noticed any problems but could this cause the plugin to
be loaded twice?
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
pgpJO3yXMQv94.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Anne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> DATE_IN_PAST_48_96 was taken out since 3.2.x. Why??
> What happens with spam between 48 and 96 hours in the past?
Looks like it was dropped due to its horribly poor performance. I can't
confirm why it was dropped, but I can point to strong evidence the rule
was worthless.
In
Just a quick question to those that are using those two together.
I have:
$max_servers = 10;
$max_requests = 15;
in amavisd.conf.
But the box's load average seems to be hovering around 2.00 all the time.
Sometimes a little lower, sometimes higher.
That is low for a quad CPU system. You want
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 17:38 -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> Just a quick question to those that are using those two together.
>
> I have:
> $max_servers = 10;
> $max_requests = 15;
>
> in amavisd.conf.
>
> But the box's load average seems to be hovering around 2.00 all the
> time. Sometimes a
Just a quick question to those that are using those two together.
I have:
$max_servers = 10;
$max_requests = 15;
in amavisd.conf.
But the box's load average seems to be hovering around 2.00 all the
time. Sometimes a little lower, sometimes higher.
Quax 500mhz Xeon, ultra 160gb disks, 1gb RA
Hi,
I've overlooked the spamd-option "--virtual-conf-dir". But unfortunatly, I
can't use this option with sql-support for the user_prefs (-q). Does someone
have an idea?
Perhaps, the only solution is to write a script, which extracts the user_prefs
from the sql-db and write them to the user_pr
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:33:31PM -0400, Hardy, Matthew wrote:
> The ArchiveIterator perl module is producing an error message. I
> tried to find a solution with the SpamAssassin user group. There
> was some user correspondence on this bug, but the proposed patch
> already seems to be incorporat
Mon Jun 18 09:30:59 EDT 2007
The ArchiveIterator perl module is producing an error message. I
tried to find a solution with the SpamAssassin user group. There
was some user correspondence on this bug, but the proposed patch
already seems to be incorporated as of SpamAssassin version
3.
At 11:15 AM 6/18/2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
My guess is that you're learning into a different DB than the one you're
trying to scan from. Do a learn with "-D" and then a dump with "-D" and
compare.
I had this problem with the default install on OS X, Apple in their
infinite wisdom has two d
Peter,
> I blew away SA today and am re-installing via CPAN - I think it may be
> something to do w/ my Perl installation as a whole... Plausible???
Can't say, my first suspects would be DNS resolver or complex regexps.
> I've reinstalled 3 times w/ the same appalling results 10-15 minute
> scan
Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi Daryl,
Thanks for getting back to me.
But... I don't have 3.2 installed.
Which I would have known if I read the debug output, rather than just
trying the config files.
I'll try it out with 3.1.8.
Daryl
Hi Mark,
At 11:18 18-06-2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
For completeness, here are my current rules to add few score
points to yahoo and gmail mail which fails verification:
header __L_ML1 Precedence =~ m{\b(list|bulk)\b}i
It's funny, I created similar rules a few weeks back. :-) I'm still
At 10:52 AM Monday, 6/18/2007, Lindsay Haisley wrote -=>
--lint has failed so it'll run properly next time.
--- /root/rules_du_jour.orig2007-06-17 21:01:24.0 -0500
+++ /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour 2007-06-18 12:37:44.0 -05
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:01:42PM -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> 25_uribl.cf contains a number of domains to skip via the
> "uridnsbl_skip_domain"
> command. Is there a command comparable to unwhitelist_from that would apply
> to
> the uridnsbl?
Not really. At that point you may as well just w
Thanks for the response - unfortunately - there aren't any local, custom rules.
I even removed all of the RulesDuJour whilst testing.
I blew away SA today and am re-installing via CPAN - I think it may be
something to do w/ my Perl installation as a whole... Plausible???
I've reinstalled 3 times
25_uribl.cf contains a number of domains to skip via the "uridnsbl_skip_domain"
command. Is there a command comparable to unwhitelist_from that would apply to
the uridnsbl?
Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ElectroNet Intermedia Consulting
3411 Capital Medical Blvd.
Talla
On Monday 18 June 2007 13:15, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Rob Wright wrote:
> > sa-learn --ham -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots --spam --no-sync
> > Maildir/new
> >
> > So, then, spamassassin isn't seeing the ham that I'm feeding it? Why
> > would it see the spam but not the ha
With the PayPal transitioning its service for European customers
from UK to Luxemburg, it is beginning to use new sending address,
which may not be in people's whitelist, so here is my update
to facilitate legitimate PayPal mail reaching its customers
(I'm including ebay entries for good measure):
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:06:52 +0200, Rob Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
sa-learn --ham -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots --spam --no-sync
Maildir/new
Don't use the --spam flag when learning ham
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Rob Wright wrote:
> sa-learn --ham -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots --spam --no-sync
> Maildir/new
>
> So, then, spamassassin isn't seeing the ham that I'm feeding it? Why would it
> see the spam but not the ham?
--ham *and* --spam ?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:06:52PM -0500, Rob Wright wrote:
> So, I went back to where my ham is and re-ran sa-learn on that with this
> result (after first using --forget):
>
> sa-learn --ham -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots --spam --no-sync
> Maildir/new
What's with the -C ?
> sa-learn -
Hi Daryl,
Thanks for getting back to me.
But... I don't have 3.2 installed.
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Anthony,
You were getting the warnings about the plugin being loaded twice since
it was being loaded twice.
You had added a loadplugin line for your local copy of ImageInfo in
"v312.pre"
On Monday 18 June 2007 12:36, ian douglas wrote:
> Rob Wright wrote:
> > So far I've managed to run ~2500 messages through sa-learn over the
> > course of the last week or so, and I've yet to see a single log entry
> > with a BAYES rule match of any kind.
>
> From your own logs:
>
> [24761] dbg: b
It seems as if the problem HTML redirect page is hiding somewhere when
rules_du_jour gets to its SA lint check, and it doesn't show up until
the rollback is done, so the patch I sent earlier isn't effective. I'll
need to read the code more thoroughly and don't have time now, so here's
a quicker-n-
Gregorics Tamás wrote:
I have a problem with bayes' scoring. It gave BAYES_99=3.5 to a mail
which is not a spam. Unfortunately with this addition it reached my
required score so it got classified as spam.
How can i fix this behavior?
Tweak the autolearn thresholds a little.
Only auto learni
Hi Rob,
At 10:23 18-06-2007, Rob Wright wrote:
[24761] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1182182134
[24761] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0 ham(s) in bayes DB <
100
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesNotWorking
Regards,
-sm
Rob Wright wrote:
So far I've managed to run ~2500 messages through sa-learn over the course of
the last week or so, and I've yet to see a single log entry with a BAYES rule
match of any kind.
From your own logs:
[24761] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0 ham(s) in bayes
DB < 100
Greetings,
It seems to be a common question but I haven't yet been able to figure out
what's wrong on my end with this. SpamAssassin itself is working, it's
detecting and flagging messages based on the built in rules, but Bayes seems
to be non-functioning.
I'm using SA 3.2.0, Perl 5.8.8, usin
At 06:18 AM 6/18/2007, Shane Williams wrote:
So, unless you're intending to block dynamic IPs as part of your
method, I'd say this is a false-positive situation.
Our mail and web server is on a business dynamic address, has been
for years and serves several domains. We block (554 error) dynam
Three minutes for regex processing is very much NOT normal, unless you are
running on a 66mhz box or the like.
First question: are you thrashing? That is the number one reason for slow
SA processing, you have run out of memory for one reason or another.
If the 3 minutes is CPU time and you a
Rick Cooper wrote:
I am probably over sensitive to blacklists of this nature because of past
problems. I had an issue where someone could not deliver a reply to a
customer once and when I investigated I found the (actually two) server was
on a blacklist I had never heard of. I let our ISP kno
At 05:14 AM 6/18/2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Maybe spf failure? Did they just change the name of one of their hosts?
Maybe spf dns timed out. If that happened, maybe the whitelisting would
fail, and the 'forged yahoo', etc would take over.
I passed this on to the person who runs the server
Investigating 12 minute/message processing time - SA hangs on
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check.
I've commented out / disabled (pyzor / razor / dcc) as well as
everything except 'check main' in v320.pre. I removed all of the
rulesdujour as well.
How can I isolate this to figure it out?
Any idea
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 10:00 AM
> To: Rick Cooper
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My Newly Expanded DNS Blacklist - Who wants to try it?
>
>
>
> Rick Cooper wrote:
> > I don't know
Ok, you asked for it.
RTFM!.
Dan
Some messages not getting scored by bayes is understandable but bayes is not
scoring for any email. Database corruption? How likely is that?
Any suggestions, pointers, RTFMs highly appreciated.
Hello,
Bayes is returning undef for all mails passing through our server.
Spamassassin 3.2.0, amavisd-new 2.5.0, perl 5.8.8, mysql 5.0.42 and
bayes is on InnoDB.
sunny ~ # grep -i bayes /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.cf|grep -v secrets.cf
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:# Use Bayesian classifier (def
John Rudd wrote:
If you're going to do this, I would suggest that instead of counting
to X hits on your low priority MX's and then blacklisting the IP, do
this:
Count on all of your MX's, and look for a ratio between "hits on low
priority MX's and hits on high priority MX's".
IF the hig
Marc Perkel wrote:
Rick Cooper wrote:
I don't know what his reason is but had I attempted to send mail to your
server last Friday I could easily have ended up hitting one of your
higher
MXs. I had a problem with Verizon where I would loose my connection for
seconds to a min and everything wo
Rick Cooper wrote:
I don't know what his reason is but had I attempted to send mail to your
server last Friday I could easily have ended up hitting one of your higher
MXs. I had a problem with Verizon where I would loose my connection for
seconds to a min and everything would be fine for second
Shane Williams wrote:
This is a personal mail server, so I know exactly who sends mail on
it, and "we" don't have a spam problem (unless you mean all the spam
we're fighting to keep out). Of course, since it's a dynamic address,
I can't be certain that other users of this address haven't sent
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 9:31 AM
> To: Shane Williams
> Cc: Daryl C. W. O'Shea; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My Newly Expanded DNS Blacklist - Who wants to try it?
>
>
>
> Shane Williams
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Shane - your listing has nothing to do with dynamic IPs. The way you got
listed is that your server hit my high MX records when all of my lower MX
records were working. What I'm still investigating is why that happened. And
it's a problem I intend to fix
Hi all.
I was trying to shave down the 7+ minutes it takes for
Postfix/amavisd/SA to process a single message today and
wondered about the two biggest choke points I could identify.
*feeding a test message to spamassassin:
# su - vscan -c 'spamassassin -D &1' | timestamp
** versions:
FC4
SpamA
Shane Williams wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Shane Williams wrote:
Here's the "failed for the last 4 hours" message...
- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to mx.junkemailfilter.com.:
<<< 550-REJECTED - 70.112.27.10 is blacklisted at
hostkarm
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Shane Williams wrote:
Here's the "failed for the last 4 hours" message...
- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to mx.junkemailfilter.com.:
<<< 550-REJECTED - 70.112.27.10 is blacklisted at
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com
<<
Arne Hoffmann wrote:
> Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
>
>
>> body LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE /test/
>> score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE 1.000
>> describe LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE This is a simple test rule
>>
>> The problem is that the rule doesn't seems to be parsed.
>>
>
> Yes, if you want t
Le lundi 18 juin 2007 à 03:45 -0700, Loren Wilton a écrit :
> > header LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE/test/
> > score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE1.000
> > describeLOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULEThis is a simple test rule
> >
> > AFAIK there are four different types of rules: body, rawbod
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Durand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:10 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: mailing list being tagged
>
>
> I've started having a mailing list tagged as spam. In the past the
> list always received scores li
I've started having a mailing list tagged as spam. In the past the
list always received scores like -90 to -100.
The list provider also provides our backup MX, so his network is
trusted.
I have had them whitelisted for some time
whitelist_from_spf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Begin forwarde
-Original Message-
From: Anne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 6:21 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: what happened to DATE_IN_PAST_48_96 ??
Hi,
DATE_IN_PAST_48_96 was taken out since 3.2.x. Why??
What happens with spam between 48 and 96 hours in the pas
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:22:28AM +0200, Gregorics Tamás wrote:
> I have a problem with bayes' scoring. It gave BAYES_99=3.5 to a mail
> which is not a spam. Unfortunately with this addition it reached my
> required score so it got classified as spam.
>
> How can i fix this behavior? Only auto
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:37:27AM -0400, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Is there any way to adjust groups of tests like increasing all
> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_* tests by +1.0?
No and yes. There is no concept of a rule group, nor can you apply score
updates to a glob/regex -- so you have to specify each rule
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:03:36PM +0530, ram wrote:
>I have been downloading SARE rules via RDJ all this while. But since
> last week we have had files with "site unavailable" "try later" etc in
> the cf files
You may be interested in using sa-update which doesn't have this problem.
--
Rand
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:16:22AM -0700, diptanjan wrote:
> My question is, I am using update.spamassassin.org as well as other sources
> to update my rules.
> Is it possible default rules from update.spamassassin.org and other rules
> can conflict at any point.
It depends what you mean by "con
diptanjan schrieb:
Hi Friends,
Hi!
My question is, I am using update.spamassassin.org as well as other sources
to update my rules.
Is it possible default rules from update.spamassassin.org and other rules
can conflict at any point.
May be same rules set up in both places but scored differen
ram schrieb:
Hi,
I have been downloading SARE rules via RDJ all this while. But since
last week we have had files with "site unavailable" "try later" etc in
the cf files
I manually have to find and download these files on all my servers
What I plan to do is to download all files to a tempor
header LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE/test/
score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE1.000
describeLOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULEThis is a simple test rule
AFAIK there are four different types of rules: body, rawbody, header and
full.
Yes, if you want to match 'test' in the Subject, you need
Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
> So, the local.cf file is read when using the CLI but not when Amavis
> invokes SA.
I don't know too much about amavisd-new, but on my machines amavis does read
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf. But the file has to be readable for the user
that amavisd-new runs as.
You could
Hi,
DATE_IN_PAST_48_96 was taken out since 3.2.x. Why??
What happens with spam between 48 and 96 hours in the past?
thanks.
Anne
Hi Friends,
I am using Spamassassin 3.2.0.
I update my rules regularly and setup a cronjob to update my rules.
I use the following command to update my rules :
sa-update --channelfile -channels.txt --nogpg
In my channels.txt file I have the following list :
update.spamassassin.org
72_sare_re
Hi,
I have been downloading SARE rules via RDJ all this while. But since
last week we have had files with "site unavailable" "try later" etc in
the cf files
I manually have to find and download these files on all my servers
What I plan to do is to download all files to a temporary location ,
Hello,
I have to use individual bayes-dbs for virtual users and domains
(everything is stored in a mysql-db). The user_prefs are stored in the
mysql-db, too.
Because there are no local users, I can't use ~/.spamassassin/bayes
For example, if I use the domain "dschung.de" or "dschung.com", I
Le lundi 18 juin 2007 à 10:49 +0200, Arne Hoffmann a écrit :
> Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
>
> > > Yes, if you want to match 'test' in the Subject, you need a header rule:
> > >
> > > header LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE/test/
> > > score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE1.000
> > > describe
Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
> > Yes, if you want to match 'test' in the Subject, you need a header rule:
> >
> > header LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE/test/
> > score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE1.000
> > describeLOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULEThis is a simple test rule
> >
> >
> > AFAIK
Le lundi 18 juin 2007 à 10:37 +0200, Arne Hoffmann a écrit :
> Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
>
> > body LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE /test/
> > score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE 1.000
> > describe LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE This is a simple test rule
> >
> > The problem is that the rule doesn't seems to
Emmanuel Lesouef wrote:
> body LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE /test/
> score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE 1.000
> describe LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE This is a simple test rule
>
> The problem is that the rule doesn't seems to be parsed.
>
> For example, here are the spamassassin headers for an emai
Dear list,
I'm trying to add my own rules to spamassassin.
I put them in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf as it is explained in
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules
I'm testing with the default "newbie" rule :
body LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE /test/
score LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_RULE 1.000
des
From: "Jari Fredriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
From: "WLamotte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry if this is an obvious question but why isn't there an option
for Spamassassin to bounce spam? Sure it does a good job at
filtering spam but I
don't want it from my web(mail)server to my inbox. I
Hi!
... while talking to mx.junkemailfilter.com.:
<<< 550-REJECTED - 70.112.27.10 is blacklisted at
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com
<<< 550 (127.0.0.2); 70.112.27.10
... while talking to mx.junkemailfilter.net.:
<<< 550-REJECTED - 70.112.27.10 is blacklisted at
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com
<<< 55
70 matches
Mail list logo
