Hi,
Is there any way to adjust groups of tests like increasing all
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_* tests by +1.0?
Mike
Hi!
I have a problem with bayes' scoring. It gave BAYES_99=3.5 to a mail
which is not a spam. Unfortunately with this addition it reached my
required score so it got classified as spam.
How can i fix this behavior? Only auto learning is enabled with the
default threshold, no one could possib
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:21 AM
> To: Shane Williams
> Cc: Daryl C. W. O'Shea; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My Newly Expanded DNS Blacklist - Who wants to try it?
ok - that's a different IP and that
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:55 AM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My Newly Expanded DNS Blacklist - Who wants to try it?
>
>
>
>
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > Buy, befo
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert - eLists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:24 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: My Newly Expanded DNS Blacklist - Who wants to try it?
>
> Michael,
>
> Them's scrappin words partner.:-|
>
> Maybe you c
Thanks Daryl.
That error is now no more.
Cheers,
AK.
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 18 June 2007 12:59 PM
To: Anthony Kamau
Cc: SpamAssassin Mailing List
Subject: Re: Problems with Received: header checks and ALL_TRUSTED
rule...
As l
Anthony,
You were getting the warnings about the plugin being loaded twice since
it was being loaded twice.
You had added a loadplugin line for your local copy of ImageInfo in
"v312.pre" and SA was loading the copy included with SA 3.2 via "v320.pre".
So... not a bug.
Regards,
Daryl
Michael Scheidell wrote:
Buy, before you use it, I suggest you google for 'blocked.secnap.net'
(you will see a 2003 set of posts announcing this list).
Odd - I only get 15 list when I google it.
> on 6/17/2007 Michael Scheidell of SECNAP.NET babbled:
>
> And you were told, in original thread, what a stupid idea this is, and
> why it's a stupid idea, and why using this blacklist is a stupid idea,
> but I suppose if you want to block all the spam, I have a better list,
> 100% guarenteed to
Shane Williams wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Shane Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > > Using my new ideas here's my raw blacklist file. It has about
80k IP > > addresses and is updated every 10 minutes.
> > > > htt
Anthony Kamau wrote:
I've checked my logs and noticed the following entry whenever I restart
the spamassassin service:
config: dup unknown type msa_networks, Mail::SpamAssassin::NetSet
Is this something I should be worried about?
As long as you don't have any users calling "clear_msa_networks
I've checked my logs and noticed the following entry whenever I restart
the spamassassin service:
config: dup unknown type msa_networks, Mail::SpamAssassin::NetSet
Is this something I should be worried about?
Cheers,
AK.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Kamau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Shane Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
> > Using my new ideas here's my raw blacklist file. It has about 80k IP
> > addresses and is updated every 10 minutes.
> >
> > http://iplist.junkemailfilt
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 8:27 PM
> To: Shane Williams; Spamass
> Subject: Re: My Newly Expanded DNS Blacklist - Who wants to try it?
> As to what I'm doing I talked about it in a different thread.
> The idea
> is tha
Whats the deal with this?
It looks as if periodically RulesEmporium gets busy and sends a refresh
file instead of a real .cf file, probably with the intent of asking the
requesting client to try again. curl can't deal intelligently with a
http-equiv refresh, so rather than trying again, it simply
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 19:24 -0400, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Although rule_du_jour is still giving me HTML for SARE_OEM.
Delete /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJure/70_sare_oem*
(or /etc/spamassassin/RulesDuJure/70_sare_oem*) and run rules_du_jour
again.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "In an open world
Shane Williams wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Using my new ideas here's my raw blacklist file. It has about 80k IP
addresses and is updated every 10 minutes.
http://iplist.junkemailfilter.com/black.txt
Here's instructions on how to use it with SpamAssassin and Exim.
http:/
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Shane Williams wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Using my new ideas here's my raw blacklist file. It has about 80k IP
addresses and is updated every 10 minutes.
http://iplist.junkemailfilter.com/black.txt
Here's instructions on how to use it with Spa
Hi Jerry,
I added a bunch of other SARE cfs and I'm doing much much better now.
Although rule_du_jour is still giving me HTML for SARE_OEM.
Thanks to all who helped,
Mike
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:45:34 -0700
Jerry Durand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 70_sare_oem.cf
--
Michael B Allen
PHP Active
Shane Williams wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Using my new ideas here's my raw blacklist file. It has about 80k IP
addresses and is updated every 10 minutes.
http://iplist.junkemailfilter.com/black.txt
Here's instructions on how to use it with SpamAssassin and Exim.
http://w
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Using my new ideas here's my raw blacklist file. It has about 80k IP
addresses and is updated every 10 minutes.
http://iplist.junkemailfilter.com/black.txt
Here's instructions on how to use it with SpamAssassin and Exim.
http://wiki.ctyme.com/index.php
At 12:39 PM 6/17/2007, Michael B Allen wrote:
Hi,
With only SARE_STOCKS EVILNUMBERS0 SARE_RANDOM I'm still getting
quite a bit of spam.
What SARE rule do people recommend? Is it ok to have a lot of them?
Mike
While no means a special list, here's what I use:
updates.spamassassin.org
72_sa
Hi,
With only SARE_STOCKS EVILNUMBERS0 SARE_RANDOM I'm still getting quite a bit of
spam.
What SARE rule do people recommend? Is it ok to have a lot of them?
Mike
Hello!
> Hmm... I know you said standard Etch packages but those versions do
> not match the versions in Etch. They match the versions in Testing.
> Therefore I conclude that you are actually running Debian testing.
>
Didn't think so but obviously I must mess things up while experimenting
with
Stefan Hoth wrote:
> Since I upgraded my box to debian etch I have the same errors day by day.
>
> I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.2.0 running on Perl version 5.8.8
> (standard etch-package) with amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) (also etch-pack).
Hmm... I know you said standard Etch packages but
Hello list!
I'm new here so please be nice to me :)
Since I upgraded my box to debian etch I have the same errors day by day.
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.2.0 running on Perl version 5.8.8
(standard etch-package) with amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) (also etch-pack).
There is a cronjob bund
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> jdow wrote:
>
>>
>> Having been a victim of a forged "From:" address hack, a Joe Job, I
>> can tell you reliably that I will crawl through the wires back to the
>> MTA that bounced back to me and rip the CPU out of the hard drive.
>> And if the operator is nearby I will
>
> I can
>tell you reliably that I will crawl through the wires back to the MTA
>that bounced back to me and rip the CPU out of the hard drive. And if
>the operator is nearby I will rip his heart out through his mouth.
>
>{o.o} Joanne hates idiots who bounce and thus commit joe jobs.
>
jdow wrote:
> From: "WLamotte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Sorry if this is an obvious question but why isn't there an option
>> for Spamassassin to bounce spam? Sure it does a good job at
>> filtering spam but I
>> don't want it from my web(mail)server to my inbox. I want my web- or
>> mailserver t
WLamotte wrote:
> Sorry if this is an obvious question but why isn't there an option for
> Spamassassin to bounce spam? Sure it does a good job at filtering spam but
> I don't want it from my web(mail)server to my inbox. I want my web- or
> mailserver to bounce suspected spam. Is this a feature t
From: "WLamotte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry if this is an obvious question but why isn't there an option for
Spamassassin to bounce spam? Sure it does a good job at filtering spam but
I
don't want it from my web(mail)server to my inbox. I want my web- or
mailserver to bounce suspected spam. Is
31 matches
Mail list logo
