Hi.
>> # ls -l /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin
>> AWL.pm
>> AccessDB.pm
>> AntiVirus.pm
>> AutoLearnThreshold.pm
>> DCC.pm
>> DKIM.pm
>> DomainKeys.pm
>> Hashcash.pm
>> MIMEHeader.pm
>> Pyzor.pm
>> Razor2.pm
>> RelayCountry.pm
>> ReplaceTags.pm
>> SPF.pm
>> SpamCop.pm
>>
Go see the tutorials on http://osx.topicdesk.com/
If you're like me, you hosed your system trying to upgrade. You may have
to wipe the disk and re-install OSX.
The TopicDesk tutorials are great!
On Mon, June 4, 2007 5:04 pm, Matthew Hardy wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade to spamassassin 3.2.0 fr
I am trying to upgrade to spamassassin 3.2.0 from 3.1.8, with my
operating
system being Mac OS X, v 10.4.9. The install failed when running cpan,
despite an earlier successful installation. The following is a part of
the script file of the terminal output during the cpan session. It
indicat
On Monday 04 June 2007 5:50 pm, John Rudd wrote:
> > [cf: 73]
> > 10 CLAMAV Clam AntiVirus detected a virus
> > 1.0 SAGREY Adds 1.0 to spam from first-time senders
>
> How come the ClamAV plugin doesn't report the virus found, in the
Content analysis details: (16.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
0.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server
[206.51.237.119 lis
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 9:55 am, Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I was interested in the following plugin and hence AutoWhitelist:
> SAGrey
> SAGrey is two-phased, in that it first looks to see if the current score
> of the current message exceeds the user-defined threshold value (as set
> in one
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 9:52 am, ram wrote:
> This is a very intelligently written scam mail
>
> http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/missed.txt
>
> I set my servers to pretty aggressive custom rules , but I am not able
> to catch this spam
>
> Bayes has messed up agreed but even not counting bayes almost n
Does anyone know why the UNDISC_RECIPS was removed from
20_head_tests.cf tests? I searched the dev lists and it's mentioned in
the context of being obsolete when ran against the corpus but I've seen
alot of spam that is seen as being sent to undisclosed-recipients (aka
BCC). I've added it to my
Manu wrote:
> I'll pipe it into a new file and work with grep from this point on.
> Works nice :)
[snip shell]
IIRC there's suitable syntax for a procmail recipe to do what you want
(I don't think you need formail for anything other than adding a custom
header; procmail can match content in heade
1.14 is probably a O/S specific build release like a .deb. But you are
correct though is that is the case as 4.60.8-1 is the current stable.
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:14:52 -0500, Richard Frovarp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You'll also probably want to join the MailScanner list as well. 1.14 is
> q
You'll also probably want to join the MailScanner list as well. 1.14 is
quite old.
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi Jason,
Yes it will work fine. A few minor tweaks are required so nothing major.
Best thing is to join the mailwatch mailing list and introduce yourself :)
Regards,
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007
Hi Jason,
Yes it will work fine. A few minor tweaks are required so nothing major.
Best thing is to join the mailwatch mailing list and introduce yourself :)
Regards,
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:03:02 -0400, "Jason Holbrook"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed on the MailWatch site that the docum
I noticed on the MailWatch site that the documentation states that supports
only certain products. Two of the products in our setup PostFix and Clam AV are
not listed. I did however see links to patches for these products. Are Postfix
and Clam able to run within the MailWatch / MailScanner setup
mailwatch.sourceforge.net ?
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:51:08 -0400, "Jason Holbrook"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running SpamAssassin version 3.2.0 on Ubuntu Linux. I am using
> Postfix, AMAVISD -New, MailScanner and ClamAV. I use Spamassassin as a
> part of a SMTP Mail Gateway for and exchange s
I am running SpamAssassin version 3.2.0 on Ubuntu Linux. I am using
Postfix, AMAVISD -New, MailScanner and ClamAV. I use Spamassassin as a
part of a SMTP Mail Gateway for and exchange server.
Question, is anyone familiar with a method in which users spam can be
held on the Spamassassin platform
Ben Lentz wrote:
>> I had similar problem a week or two ago.
>>
>> I have a site wide system, and I use user "spam" to run the stuff.
>>
>> However, it seemed that user "root" somehow got some stuff for it's
>> account, and indeed spamd was using root's account for all scanning
>> (that's why tru
Ben Lentz schrieb:
My bayes configuration is based on a little IMAP-derived user feed
back data, but by vast majority is trained by the auto-learning system.
You cant trust your users, they will put newsletters they ordered but
dont know how to stop and other non-spam into the spamfolder.
arni
I had similar problem a week or two ago.
I have a site wide system, and I use user "spam" to run the stuff.
However, it seemed that user "root" somehow got some stuff for it's account, and indeed
spamd was using root's account for all scanning (that's why truncating "spam"'s data did
not he
Just a guess and probably wrong, but if you encrypt your data in mySQL
are you sure your system can read the key file and de-crypt the data?
If not bayes will be feed encrypted mail and will soon become
corrupted. Also have you tried to simply delete all from your mySQL
bayes bases and retrai
Jari Fredriksson schrieb:
I had similar problem a week or two ago.
Are you both using autolearn only, or do you manually learn with
sa-learn (or similar) ?
You probably poisened you bayes db by learning ham as spam.
If you're using autolearning: Adjust your scores and generally make sure
Just a guess and probably wrong, but if you encrypt your data in mySQL
are you sure your system can read the key file and de-crypt the data?
If not bayes will be feed encrypted mail and will soon become
corrupted. Also have you tried to simply delete all from your mySQL
bayes bases and retrain it
I have a pair of servers with global Bayes DBs that no longer remember
which messages they've learned, for no apparent reason I can see. I
can't think of any particular changes I might have made that might cause
this.
A third machine with per-user Bayes seems to learn fine for at least one
user a
I had similar problem a week or two ago.
I have a site wide system, and I use user "spam" to run the stuff.
However, it seemed that user "root" somehow got some stuff for it's account,
and indeed spamd was using root's account for all scanning (that's why
truncating "spam"'s data did not help.
For how AWL computes its scores see
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist.
For doing manual whitelisting see
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualWhitelist.
How do you call spamassassin? If from amavis you can also whitelist in
its config files.
.rp wrote:
I'm very co
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury schrieb:
We are using spamassassin at the gateway level with exim. Is it a good
idea to use bayes as we don't know which is ham or spam - and the users
are unlikely to give us the feed back from different system. In that
case bayes learning ability will be compromised.
Greetings list!
Starting Friday, June 1st, every email that passes through my site-wide
SpamAssassin system has been coming through with BAYES_99. I've been
running with Bayes for months without any accuracy problems, and I can't
figure out what has changed.
I am storing the Bayes data in a
I'm very confused now.
How does it determine which message to use for the 'old score' ?
if I wanted to assign a negative number to those addresses that are
whitelisted in order to let more of them through, what am I supposed to use
if not AWL ?
thanks,
On 31 May 2007 at 11:56, Craig Carriere wro
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
We are using spamassassin at the gateway level with exim. Is it a good
idea to use bayes as we don't know which is ham or spam - and the users
are unlikely to give us the feed back from different system. In that
case bayes learning ability will be compromised.
I
We are using spamassassin at the gateway level with exim. Is it a good
idea to use bayes as we don't know which is ham or spam - and the users
are unlikely to give us the feed back from different system. In that
case bayes learning ability will be compromised.
If bayes can be used how can I modi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi,
I found this message in my inbox - no image, attachment, etc. besides that:
Outlook send cool enhanced emails. Inserted body place images specific
location, want.
Selection it inserted body place images specific location want!
That reminds me:
Beautiful sungla
Hello!
> Gentoo
> Spamassassin 3.1.8-r1
We have almost the same setup. I post ours for comparison but otherwise I'm no
expert, unfortunately.
>
> I have two spamassassin folders in my Gentoo Linux:
>
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin
> and
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Ma
31 matches
Mail list logo
