I'm running SAProxy 3.1.7.0 (http://sawin32.sourceforge.net/) with
standard rules plus some SARE ones, all updated via SAUpdate, along with
Bayes and network testing on Windows XP SP2 and Mozilla 1.7.13.
I've started receiving some obvious spam recently that didn't get picked
up. Examples are
Sometime yesterday, without me knowingly changing anything (maybe an
apt-get upgrade), SA started throwing the following warnings on nearly
every message. It still seems to be working okay and spam is being
correctly ID'd, but the logfile's now full of these.
I've tried copying a fresh copy of
Daryl C. W. O'Shea skrev:
For anyone who's not aware of it, I should mention that Michael Monnerie
has been maintaining a German spam ruleset for quite some time and has
been as of late updating it often.
# Home: http://sa.zmi.at/rulesets/70_zmi_german.cf
# SpamAssassin Channel: 70_zmi_german.
At 18:12 29-05-2007, Eric Lemings wrote:
How do I use SpamAssassin (along with any other necessary mail
software) to kill spam dead? I mean so that it doesn't even reach
my mail spool directory.
I've looked in FAQ after FAQ, site after site, book after book, and
the closest thing to an ans
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:36:32PM -0300, Wilson A. Galafassi Jr. wrote:
> I having this error at my spamassassin.
>
> check: no loaded plugin implements 'check_main': cannot scan! at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 164
>
> how i can fix this?
Make sure th
From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Eric Lemings wrote:
How do I use SpamAssassin (along with any other necessary mail software)
to kill spam dead? I mean so that it doesn't even reach my mail spool
directory.
I've looked in FAQ after FAQ, site after site, book after bo
Eric Lemings wrote:
How do I use SpamAssassin (along with any other necessary mail software)
to kill spam dead? I mean so that it doesn't even reach my mail spool
directory.
I've looked in FAQ after FAQ, site after site, book after book, and the
closest thing to an answer that I've found i
How do I use SpamAssassin (along with any other necessary mail software)
to kill spam dead? I mean so that it doesn't even reach my mail spool
directory.
I've looked in FAQ after FAQ, site after site, book after book, and the
closest thing to an answer that I've found is the chapter in O'Reill
Doc Schneider wrote:
>
>
> Not sure how you're using SA but I commented out every reference to
> CIALIS2 and just committed 1.00.11 so should be available within the hour.
>
> Also running CentOS 4.4 you know you can upgrade to perl 5.8.8 by doing
> a 'yum --enablerepo=centosplus update perl'
Michael Scheidell wrote:
I wish you people would stop that crap.
You are phucking up the AWL scored for users@spamassassin.apache.org
If your SA doesn't pick that up, and you want to post a spam, post it to
a web site and post a link.
If you have a problem with yahoo, fwd that copy to yahoo.
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> How about in local.cf setting
> use_auto_whitelist 1
>
Redundant, as it defaults to 1.
It won't hurt anything, but it is not needed.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 May 2007 13:22
> To: Sujit Acharyya-Ch
bjquinn wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to get sa-update working with the default channel. It seems
that no matter what I try I always get something like the following if I do
a debug output on sa-update
[30900] dbg: dns: query failed: 8.1.3.updates.spamassassin.org => NXDOMAIN
This applies to SA versio
Martin,
> > You got the syntax wrong, remove the commas, the qw Perl operator
> > splits on whitespace and commas remain part of a filename.
> Removing the commas has one effect:
> Starting virus-scanner (amavisd-new):Subroutine
> is_charset_ok_for_locales redefined at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/
I wish you people would stop that crap.
You are phucking up the AWL scored for users@spamassassin.apache.org
If your SA doesn't pick that up, and you want to post a spam, post it to
a web site and post a link.
If you have a problem with yahoo, fwd that copy to yahoo. Or blacklist
them.
--
Mic
Can people scan the attached spam for me and let me know what scores
they get?
I got the following hits:
ADVANCE_FEE_1,
BAYES_00,
HTML_MESSAGE
Thanks
Ben
Received: from hood.systems.pipex.net (hood.systems.pipex.net [62.241.163.20])
by twilight.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
Hi, I'm trying to get sa-update working with the default channel. It seems
that no matter what I try I always get something like the following if I do
a debug output on sa-update
[30900] dbg: dns: query failed: 8.1.3.updates.spamassassin.org => NXDOMAIN
This applies to SA version 3.1.8 and 3.2.
For anyone who's not aware of it, I should mention that Michael Monnerie
has been maintaining a German spam ruleset for quite some time and has
been as of late updating it often.
# Home: http://sa.zmi.at/rulesets/70_zmi_german.cf
Interesting, it contains a collection of stock spam rules amazi
Well, perhaps that is a more generic spam indicator: german text but not a
single Umlaut. I must think about that.
You'd want a length qualifier on that test. An email of simply "Danke" would
contain a very small number of umlauts.
Perhaps, such a rule should look for frequently used german w
For anyone who's not aware of it, I should mention that Michael Monnerie
has been maintaining a German spam ruleset for quite some time and has
been as of late updating it often.
# Home: http://sa.zmi.at/rulesets/70_zmi_german.cf
# SpamAssassin Channel: 70_zmi_german.cf.zmi.sa-update.dostech.ne
Hi Alex,
thank you for this nice collection ... I had started to add a few of them.
I agree with you that this spammer probably is not german, but I would guess
that the
person uses a dictionary / translator and is composing the message on a keyboard
without umlauts.
As for the imageshack: soo
Interesting is the spelling. It seems to me the author of the spam messages
isn't german or of very low education, since his spelling and style is
really awful - like a child of 15 years. And the spam sending software
doesn't seem to be able to handle german Umlauts (äöüßÄÖÜ).
Well, perhaps that
Apart from the imageshack stuff just seem to generally have a lot of spam in
the german langauge getting through the filters, has anyone else experienced
the same.
Certainly. It's getting through, because there are almost no german
language specific rules in the default rules of SpamAssassin, an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henry Kwan wrote:
>
> Doc Schneider wrote:
>> I just now committed more fixes for 70_sare_obfu.cf, obfu0 and obfu1.
>> These should be available within the hour.
>>
>> Please folks if you have a problem with a rule set from SARE please let
>> us know
Doc Schneider wrote:
>
> I just now committed more fixes for 70_sare_obfu.cf, obfu0 and obfu1.
> These should be available within the hour.
>
> Please folks if you have a problem with a rule set from SARE please let
> us know what rule it is and what rule set it is in.
>
Hi Doc,
I just updat
Hello,
I'm running SA 3.2.0 on FC6 via spamd. I'm using AWL with per-user
configuration. I invoke spamd with:
--virtual-config-dir=/whatever/%d/%l
Thus, when a message arrives for [EMAIL PROTECTED], SA creates:
/whatever/domain.com/
/whatever/domain.com/joe/
/whatever/domain.com/joe/auto-wh
Hi,
I just received a reply telling me my mail was recognised as spam.
As I can tell from the header in the reply he is using an old version of SA
and the following:
URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL
blocklist * [URIs: sovoxxx.be]
Does this mean I'm blacklisted some
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I just ran sa-supdate
Now I see my perl going through the roof and my maillog now says
prefork: child states: BB
May 29 11:11:03 milter spamd[20122]: prefork: server reached --max-children
setting, consider raising it
This was not happenin
On Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:15 PM ram wrote:
> bayes_99 = 7.0. Oops dont you get FPs on that.
Maybe once or twice a month. Other negative rules usually get the mails below 6
which is my spam threashold. Using MailScanner those mails are still delivered
to my Junk Mail Folder in Outlook. Everythi
Hello.
I having this error at my spamassassin.
check: no loaded plugin implements 'check_main': cannot scan! at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 164
how i can fix this?
Thanks
Wilson Galafassi
I just ran sa-supdate
Now I see my perl going through the roof and my maillog now says
prefork: child states: BB
May 29 11:11:03 milter spamd[20122]: prefork: server reached --max-children
setting, consider raising it
This was not happening prior to sa-update I ran this morning
Thes
AbbaComm.Net wrote:
> are any ISP's out there using AWL and finding it "extremely" effective to
> the zillionth power?
I saw no reason to disable it when I first set up a spamfilter server
for the small ISP I started working for originally. This was ~SA2.4, so
there were no DNS-based URI tests an
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 17:09 +0200, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2007 4:53 PM ram wrote:
>
> > This is a very intelligently written scam mail
> >
> > http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/missed.txt
> >
> > I set my servers to pretty aggressive custom rules , but I am not
> > able to c
I just ran sa-supdate
Now I see my perl going through the roof and my maillog now says
prefork: child states: BB
May 29 11:11:03 milter spamd[20122]: prefork: server reached --max-children
setting, consider raising it
This was not happening prior to sa-update I ran this morning
These s
On Tuesday, May 29, 2007 4:53 PM ram wrote:
> This is a very intelligently written scam mail
>
> http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/missed.txt
>
> I set my servers to pretty aggressive custom rules , but I am not
> able to catch this spam
>
> Bayes has messed up agreed but even not counting bayes al
I was interested in the following plugin and hence AutoWhitelist:
SAGrey
SAGrey is two-phased, in that it first looks to see if the current score
of the current message exceeds the user-defined threshold value (as set
in one of the cf files), and then looks to see if the message sender's
email and
This is a very intelligently written scam mail
http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/missed.txt
I set my servers to pretty aggressive custom rules , but I am not able
to catch this spam
Bayes has messed up agreed but even not counting bayes almost no other
rules hit. Notwithstanding using custom spamsc
On Tue, 29 May 2007, AbbaComm.Net wrote:
I purposely set
use_auto_whitelist 0
are any ISP's out there using AWL and finding it "extremely" effective to
the zillionth power?
I have it shut off as well at the server level (local.cf). However, I do
provide the option to be turned on at the pe
I purposely set
use_auto_whitelist 0
are any ISP's out there using AWL and finding it "extremely" effective to
the zillionth power?
- rh
--
Abba Communications
Spokane, WA
www.abbacomm.net
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd *blackberry.com blackberry.com
>
>
> Dan
>
Dan,
Is this valid and does it truly take care of "ALL" blackberry cases?
- rh
--
Abba Communications
Spokane, WA
www.abbacomm.net
whitelist_from_rcvd *blackberry.com blackberry.com
Dan
-Original Message-
From: sumnicexNY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 8:49 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [3.2] BlackBerry Emails Being Tagged as Spam
Hello,
My hosting provider recently upgrad
Sorry, my mistake. I have to set use_auto_whitelist 1.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2007 13:37
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: AutoWhitelist
How about in local.cf setting
use_auto_white
decoder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
after I saw that there are incompatiblities with SA 3.2 and FuzzyOcr,
I decided to try to fix them although I'm still very busy (preparing
for Bachelor thesis).
There is still another problem though, the formatting of the rule
descri
How about in local.cf setting
use_auto_whitelist 1
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2007 13:22
To: Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AutoWhitelist
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I am using spamassassin 3
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I am using spamassassin 3.1.7 (even now) on SLES 9 (64-bit). I am
> having configuring the AutoWhitelist to work properly. Any help will
> be appreciated.
>
What are you trying to configure about it?
It should be enabled by default, if not, uncomment this li
I am using spamassassin 3.1.7 (even now) on SLES 9 (64-bit). I am
having configuring the AutoWhitelist to work properly. Any help will
be appreciated.
Many thanks
--
Sujit Choudhury
ISLS
University of Westminster
Ext 3851 / 1779
>> @additional_perl_modules = qw(
>> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locales.pm,
>> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm,
>> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/BodyEval.pm,
>> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/
Martin,
> Since I upgraded to Spamassassin 3.20 I get this (amavis) messages in my
> logfiles (for each incoming mail) Amavis New 2.4.3
> May 29 08:21:05 linux1.rk /usr/sbin/amavisd[4365]: (04365-01) extra
> modules loaded: Mail/SpamAssassin/Locales.pm,
> Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm, Mail
47 matches
Mail list logo
