At 17:06 25-05-2007, Henry Kwan wrote:
Just updated to 3.20 this week and because everything seem to be
working fine, I
didn't notice my log files getting bloated (up to 8GB!) by errors like this:
Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0x00, immediately
after start byte 0xd
After googling, it seems the common answers are to either upgrade to Perl
5.88
(I'm running 5.85) or stop using the SARE rules. Is there a third choice?
Perhaps an uncoming patch for 3.20?
Perhaps a third answer would be to get the latest versions of the rules
files?
Doc fixed those errors a
Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I get an error when trying to remove an address from AWL:
>
> # spamassassin -x --remove-addr-from-whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [85023] warn: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed: Out of
> memory during ridiculously large request at
> /usr/loca
On Friday 25 May 2007 7:06 pm, Henry Kwan wrote:
> Just updated to 3.20 this week and because everything seem to be working
> fine, I didn't notice my log files getting bloated (up to 8GB!) by errors
> like this:
>
> Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0x00,
> immediately af
Just updated to 3.20 this week and because everything seem to be working fine, I
didn't notice my log files getting bloated (up to 8GB!) by errors like this:
Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0x00, immediately
after start byte 0xd
2) in pattern match (m//) at /etc/mail/s
Mike Fahey wrote:
> spamassassin server - 3gb ram, intel quad core 2.4 cpu,freebsd 6.2
>
> Every day the bayesian database gets corrupted. We see the following
> in the log file. We only use sqlite for scores.
>
> bayes: cannot open bayes databases
> /usr/local/share/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W:
> l
Hi Stefan,
I get a lot of these Spam mails:
http://home.arcor.de/stefan_jakobs/spam-mail.txt.
And spamassassin doesn't recognise them. Here is the X-Spam header:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11]
I'm using amavisd-new 2.3.3 and Spamassassin 3.1.
Thanks for the explaination John - much appreciated..
Cheers
keith
-Original Message-
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 May 2007 18:27
To: Keith De Souza
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamd not starting
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Keith De Souza wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Keith De Souza wrote:
> When I try to restart spamd is come up with this:
>
> Shutting down spamd: [FAILED]
> Starting spamd: [ OK ]
The default init script does not wait for all children to exit before
reporting a failed stop. You'll see that if you happen to try a
resta
Mike Fahey writes:
> spamassassin server - 3gb ram, intel quad core 2.4 cpu,freebsd 6.2
>
> Every day the bayesian database gets corrupted. We see the following in
> the log file. We only use sqlite for scores.
>
> bayes: cannot open bayes databases /usr/local/share/spamassassin/bayes_*
> R/W:
Hello,
I'm wondering if any had experienced this before. I have had a look in my
maillog
and this is what it is saying
server40038 spamc[16428]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed,
retrying (#3 of 3): Connection refused
When I try to restart spamd is come up with this:
Shutting
spamassassin server - 3gb ram, intel quad core 2.4 cpu,freebsd 6.2
Every day the bayesian database gets corrupted. We see the following in
the log file. We only use sqlite for scores.
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /usr/local/share/spamassassin/bayes_*
R/W:
lock failed: Interrupted syste
Hello list,
I get a lot of these Spam mails:
http://home.arcor.de/stefan_jakobs/spam-mail.txt.
And spamassassin doesn't recognise them. Here is the X-Spam header:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11]
I'm using amavisd-new 2.3.3 and Spamassassin 3.1.
Hello,
I get an error when trying to remove an address from AWL:
# spamassassin -x --remove-addr-from-whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[85023] warn: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed: Out of memory
during ridiculously large request at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAs
ram writes:
> I am currently using SA 3.1.7 trying to updgrade to SA 3.2
>
> whitelist_auth whitelists a sender if he is validated using SPF or
> DK/DKIM .
>
> I can say
>
> whitelist_auth netcore.co.in
>
> Can I also say something like
> blacklist_unauath netcore.co.in
>
> ( ie if n
AbbaComm.Net wrote:
>> Never mind, looking into this further there's no problem with the change
>> made in r447014. The issue is qmail should be adding "with ESMTPA" and
>> not "with ESMPTA".
>>
>> Daryl
>
> What do you mean?
>
> Is there a prob between qmail or qmail accessories and SA that you
We have configured Exim gateways so that it calls SA. After tagging -
it goes to other mail servers within (sometimes outside). We have no
control of mail after it passes the gateway. I don't know how to teach
bayes about spam in this case.
Any suggestion will be useful.
Many thanks
Sujit
--
I am currently using SA 3.1.7 trying to updgrade to SA 3.2
whitelist_auth whitelists a sender if he is validated using SPF or
DK/DKIM .
I can say
whitelist_auth netcore.co.in
Can I also say something like
blacklist_unauath netcore.co.in
( ie if netcore.co.in && not validated then blac
AbbaComm.Net wrote:
Never mind, looking into this further there's no problem with the change
made in r447014. The issue is qmail should be adding "with ESMTPA" and
not "with ESMPTA".
Daryl
What do you mean?
Is there a prob between qmail or qmail accessories and SA that you have
found?
No.
Like Bill said, the T and P are transposed in what is supposed to be
"with ESMTPA". It took me copying and pasting your sample received
header into a regression test, it failing, and me swearing a bit before
I noticed it.
Daryl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Daryl,
you are speaking in riddle
20 matches
Mail list logo
