Tool to give report of rejected addresses

2007-05-19 Thread Steven W. Orr
I'm running SA with sendmail and spamass-milter with a reject score set to 5. It occurred to me that I never actually saw the daily list of email addresses of people whose messages were rejected. i.e., I never had an option to view any possible false positives. It turns out it's not a simple gr

Zen and the art of assassinating spam

2007-05-19 Thread Jerry Durand
Someone was asking about the Zen RBL from Spamhaus.org, it just occurred to me I should mention this for anyone who doesn't read the not-so-fine print. Do NOT use Zen for scoring mail bodies, Spamhaus tells you this and it will get you in trouble. Zen has includes dynamic IP addresses, b

RE: new "technical" spam

2007-05-19 Thread Keith De Souza
Yup, FuzzyOCR should do the job... Cheers Keith -Original Message- From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 May 2007 22:02 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: new "technical" spam Looks like FuzzyOCR should have a field day with that one. ImageInfo would proba

Spamassassin 3.2.0

2007-05-19 Thread Ming Hou
Hi, I just realized there are big changes in Spamassassin 3.2.0 that is required several perl modules, like: Mail::DKIM Mail::DomainKeys Encode::Detect My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required Crypt::OpenSSL::Random and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get Crypt::OpenSSL::

R: R: Question about reporting

2007-05-19 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > > > Oh, really? > > > > So why I get a DCC_CHECK only after manually reporting (with > spamassassin > > -r) a spam? > > > I have no idea. > > Are you running a check *immediately* befor

Re: R: Question about reporting

2007-05-19 Thread Matt Kettler
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > Oh, really? > > So why I get a DCC_CHECK only after manually reporting (with spamassassin > -r) a spam? > I have no idea. Are you running a check *immediately* before calling spammassassin -r? If not, the difference is probably due to passage of time more than any

Re: spamhaus blacklist

2007-05-19 Thread Matt Kettler
night duke wrote: > Hi i wish to know if i can try spamhaus blacklist and how can i do it If you're using SpamAssassin, it's enabled by default. All you need is a recent version of the Net::DNS perl module. The SpamHaus blacklists show up as three different SA rules: RCVD_IN_SBL, RCVD_IN_XBL and

spamhaus blacklist

2007-05-19 Thread night duke
Hi i wish to know if i can try spamhaus blacklist and how can i do it Thanks - LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com

Re: BAYES_99 triggered on every message

2007-05-19 Thread Duane Hill
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: Jari Fredriksson wrote: b) I have cleaned the database with sa-learn --clean (Still BAYES_99 while the bayes should be off!) What's that do? Did you mean --clear? Yup. Are you sure you did that --clear while logged in as

Re: BAYES_99 triggered on every message

2007-05-19 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Matt Kettler wrote: > Jari Fredriksson wrote: b) I have cleaned the database with sa-learn --clean (Still BAYES_99 while the bayes should be off!) >>> What's that do? Did you mean --clear? >>> >> >> Yup. >> >> > Are you sure you did that --clear while logged in as the righ

Delaying messages to increase score

2007-05-19 Thread Alexis Manning
Has anyone run any numbers on how quickly the score of an average spam increases over time? I'm using SA just on my own box so have the luxury of being able to delay likely looking messages for a few hours without any user complaints! My current set up is <7.5 is delivered, 7.5-15 is quarantin

R: Question about reporting

2007-05-19 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > Dears, > > > > what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a > given > > threshold (say, 10-12)? > > > > Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or S

Re: new 'technical' spam

2007-05-19 Thread Duncan Hill
On Fri, May 18, 2007 22:01, Loren Wilton wrote: > Looks like FuzzyOCR should have a field day with that one. ImageInfo > would probably also help. Unfortunately, it's a hyperlink, not a cid, so OCR wouldn't even see it.