spamd: result: Y 5 -
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VERIFIED,DK_SIGNED,DK_VERIFIED,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_MIMEOLE,SPF_PASS
My guess, and only a guess, is that the mail message might somehow have been
corrupted on the first try, and "fixed" by th
Jason Haar wrote:
>
> spamd: result: . 1 -
> DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
>
>
I can at least answer the DomainKey differences now. Exchange likes
removing headers it thinks aren't necessary - so although Dell is
signing their emails, the headers don't show up in
We are seeing SA-3.2.0 acting strangely/inconsistently on our FC3 servers
Ever since upgrading from 3.1.8 to 3.2.0, we have started tagging HAM
that we never had problems with before. e.g. we just had it tag email
from Dell as spam with scores >5 as follows:
spamd: result: Y 5 -
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM
Pyzor is not actively maintained. It has not been for a while. All new
pyzor installations use the main pyzor server. That server is overloaded
and queries will often timeout (5 seconds wasted). Some generous person
(Milton?) created a mirror a while ago and it responds much quicker. The
mailin
On Sunday 13 May 2007 12:28, Gary V wrote:
Thanks for the excellent notes!
> The run 'pyzor discover'. This creates
> /root/.pyzor/servers which is a file that contains the IP address and
port
> to the main pyzor server. Don't use that server. Edit and change to
> 82.94.255.100:24441
Why?
--
The run 'pyzor discover'. This creates
/root/.pyzor/servers which is a file that contains the IP address and
port
to the main pyzor server. Don't use that server. Edit and change to
82.94.255.100:24441
Why?
I believe I've read that the main Pyzor servers are noted for returning
timeouts rat
On Sunday 13 May 2007 12:28, Gary V wrote:
Thanks for the excellent notes!
> The run 'pyzor discover'. This creates
> /root/.pyzor/servers which is a file that contains the IP address and port
> to the main pyzor server. Don't use that server. Edit and change to
> 82.94.255.100:24441
Why?
--
P
On Sunday 13 May 2007, jdow wrote:
>I can't. But I can offer sympathy. Welcome to the world of the "Joe Job."
>It is the chief reason that I have pledged to NEVER EVER find in favor of
>a spammer if I find myself on a jury with him as the plaintiff or defendant.
>
>Besides, I'd probably jump over t
> Bart, you're right here, but if I was a spammer, I would avoid using
> SPF/SenderID-protected e-mail addresses in my From: headers, since it would
> reduce the choices of my message reaching dest.
I can say that since we started using SPF at $DAYJOB and finally killed the
fershlugginer catchall
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 5/13/07, Gregory P. Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > SPF seems very interesting. Does spamAssassin automatically use an
> SPF
> > record if it exists?
>
> There's a plugin.
>
> > Do I set up an SPF record w
Thanks for the heads up on this... This has given me a few ideas on
some custom blocking software... If it works out, ill be sure to
release it...
On 5/13/07, Faisal N Jawdat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the level of the traffic, you might look at implementing
something like Deny Spammers
Thanks for the heads up on this... This has given me a few ideas on
some custom blocking software... If it works out, ill be sure to
release it...
On 5/13/07, Faisal N Jawdat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the level of the traffic, you might look at implementing
something like Deny Spammers
On 5/13/07, Gregory P. Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SPF seems very interesting. Does spamAssassin automatically use an SPF
record if it exists?
There's a plugin.
Do I set up an SPF record with whoever manages my MX DNS record?
Yes. It's a TXT record. Some DNS hosting companies will s
PS
wget http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/sample-spam.txt
razor-check -d sample-spam.txt | more
The razor servers run on tcp port 2703.
_
PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows
Live
Greetings
I am not new to SA
However, I am new to razor and pyzor... I must admit to only cursory
viewing
of any of those type of posts for the past year or more...
Are those of you running medium to high volume mail servers happy with
razor
and pyzor for just the scoring they provide?
Sho
Given the level of the traffic, you might look at implementing
something like Deny Spammers at he /24 level (rather than the host
level).
https://sourceforge.net/projects/deny-spammers/
-faisal
On May 13, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Jason Frisvold wrote:
On 5/12/07, Jason Frisvold <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 16:19 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > -Messaggio originale-
> > Da: Gregory P. Ennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 15:16 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > > > -Messaggio originale-
> > > > Da: Gregory P. Ennis [mailto:[EMAIL
We cannot seem to get a clean updated copy of 20_vbounce.cf for some reason.
Dunce hat accepted.
Is there anyway that the Dev's or someone can make this more easily
accessible as a text file without the wrapping and such...
thanks
--
Abba Communications
Spokane, WA
www.abbacomm.net
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Gregory P. Ennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 15:16 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > > -Messaggio originale-
> > > Da: Gregory P. Ennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Everyone,
> > >
> > > I have used spamassassin on
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 09:53 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gregory P. Ennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 9:50 AM
> > To: jdow
> > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Inappropriate use of E-Mail addresses
> >
> >
At 05:52 13-05-2007, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I have used spamassassin on our mail servers now for over 4 years and
have nothing but high praise for what it has done for us. However,
recently we have been hit by bounced e-mail that is related to the
inappropriate use of some of our e-mail address
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory P. Ennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 9:50 AM
> To: jdow
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inappropriate use of E-Mail addresses
>
>
> OK... now we are getting somewhere exactly what I want
> to do ...
OK... now we are getting somewhere exactly what I want to do ...
maybe we should create a neighborhood spam watch society :)
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 06:12 -0700, jdow wrote:
> I can't. But I can offer sympathy. Welcome to the world of the "Joe Job."
> It is the chief reason that I have pledged
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Gregory P. Ennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Everyone,
>
> I have used spamassassin on our mail servers now for over 4 years and
> have nothing but high praise for what it has done for us. However,
> recently we have been hit by bounced e-mail that is rela
I can't. But I can offer sympathy. Welcome to the world of the "Joe Job."
It is the chief reason that I have pledged to NEVER EVER find in favor of
a spammer if I find myself on a jury with him as the plaintiff or defendant.
Besides, I'd probably jump over the jury box railing and gouge his eyes
Everyone,
I have used spamassassin on our mail servers now for over 4 years and
have nothing but high praise for what it has done for us. However,
recently we have been hit by bounced e-mail that is related to the
inappropriate use of some of our e-mail addresses.
It appears that some spam art
26 matches
Mail list logo
