Hi
Actually, all of my .cf are put into /etc/mail/spamassassin/
can i said at spamassassin to read too all .cf of on another
directory ?
Sample: /etc/mail/spamassassin/Private/*.cf
Thanks
It might be useful to note in the USERS SECTION opening paragraph that NONE
of the functions listed in the subsequent long detailed list of User
functions and switches is of any use at all unless it is enabled.
This is the first rule listed in the RULES section. And furhter
investigation indi
At 10:03 AM 5.4.2007 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>>> Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
>>> and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
>>> please use it!
>>>
>>
Heute (04.05.2007/18:44 Uhr) schrieb Rosenbaum, Larry M.,
>> From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Hi, list, I have a cron job running in order to learn from each user's
>> HAM and SPAM subdirs. Whenever it runs, it complains like this:
>>
>> Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK re
Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
please use it!
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/dow
> From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi, list, I have a cron job running in order to learn from each user's
> HAM and SPAM subdirs. Whenever it runs, it complains like this:
>
> Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK redefined at
> /usr/share/perl/5.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
> at /usr/
Graham Murray wrote:
> I am using spamassassin 3.2.0 and Postgresql 8.2.4 for bayes and awl.
>
> I am seeing several messages from Postgresql like the following
>
> spamd[18408]: WARNING: nonstandard use of \\ in a string literal
> spamd[18408]: LINE 1: select
> put_tokens(1,'{"003272\\\
Under MailScanner on an old Fedora Core 1 box here 3.2.0 ran at half the speed
of 3.1.8.
I'm not sure what was causing it.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent
Anders Norrbring wrote:
>
> I just ran into a big problem..
>
> [25735] warn: bayes: database version is different than we understand
> (3), aborting! at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm
> line 136
Double check your config for your database, make sure it
Maciej Friedel wrote:
> I can't make sa-compile because
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# spamassassin --lint
> [23577] warn: Couldn't get Connecting IP header X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP for
> message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, skipping greylisting call
> [23577] warn: rules: failed to run CG_FUJI_JPG test, skipping:
At 06:40 04-05-2007, Graham Murray wrote:
I am using spamassassin 3.2.0 and Postgresql 8.2.4 for bayes and awl.
I am seeing several messages from Postgresql like the following
spamd[18408]: WARNING: nonstandard use of \\ in a string literal
spamd[18408]: LINE 1: select
put_tokens(1,'{"003\
Jason Bertoch [Electronet] writes:
> Have the Botnet rules been absorbed into SA 3.2.0, or are the new rules
> compliamentary? Specifically, I'm looking at FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D and
> FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB.
They're complementary (as far as I know).
--j.
Ditto. I'm running 5.8.4 in one machine, and 5.8.8-4 in another, and
happens in both of them...
2007/5/4, Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This apparently is fixed in perl 5.8.8, but still happens in 5.8.6,
> 5.8.5, etc.
I see it in perl 5.8.8
-
I can't make sa-compile because
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# spamassassin --lint
[23577] warn: Couldn't get Connecting IP header X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP for
message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, skipping greylisting call
[23577] warn: rules: failed to run CG_FUJI_JPG test, skipping:
[23577] warn: (Can't locate obje
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
You can use gray-listing to avoid "blind spot" (detection delay) of such
lists to increase their efficiency.
Yes, this is what I will try to archive in the future.
Two standard questions to clear the picture:
a) Do you block dynamic ip addresses
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This apparently is fixed in perl 5.8.8, but still happens in 5.8.6,
> 5.8.5, etc.
I see it in perl 5.8.8
Have the Botnet rules been absorbed into SA 3.2.0, or are the new rules
compliamentary? Specifically, I'm looking at FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D and
FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB.
Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ElectroNet Intermedia Consulting
3411 Capital Medical Blvd.
Tallahassee, FL 3
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
This apparently is fixed in perl 5.8.8, but still happens in 5.8.6,
5.8.5, etc.
Hm, I have a Slackware 11.0 box with perl 5.8.8 and I'm getting the same
message. This problem also was there already with the previous version of
spamassassin and FuzzyOcr
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
> Hi, list, I have a cron job running in order to learn from each user's
> HAM and SPAM subdirs. Whenever it runs, it complains like this:
>
> Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK redefined at
> /usr/share/perl/5.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
> at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/POSIX.pm line 19
>
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
> Hi, list, I have a cron job running in order to learn from each user's
> HAM and SPAM subdirs. Whenever it runs, it complains like this:
>
> Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK redefined at
> /usr/share/perl/5.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
> at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/POSIX.pm line 19
>
Yup. Maybe a little too early to jump to conclusions, but since we're
running SA 3.2.0 here (two days ), less spam has made through it. I
have some spam trap accounts set up, and since the upgrade, none of
them has got any messages! (their daily rate varied from 2 to 10
messages a day).
As for th
Hi, list, I have a cron job running in order to learn from each user's
HAM and SPAM subdirs. Whenever it runs, it complains like this:
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_NONBLOCK redefined at
/usr/share/perl/5.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/POSIX.pm line 19
Any hints on how to avoid this nag?
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
please use it!
Downloads are available from:
http://spamas
I am using spamassassin 3.2.0 and Postgresql 8.2.4 for bayes and awl.
I am seeing several messages from Postgresql like the following
spamd[18408]: WARNING: nonstandard use of \\ in a string literal
spamd[18408]: LINE 1: select
put_tokens(1,'{"003272260274052"...
spamd[18408]
> Is anyone noticing small, medium, or large improvements in
> how well 3.2.0 does it's job compared to 3.1.8 ???
I'm seeing less spam slipping through in 3.2.0 rc3 than with 3.1.8. Of
course, that could be coincidental, but I'd rather attribute it to the
SA upgrade.
Bret
At 01:43 PM 5.2.2007 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now available! This is the official release,
>and contains a significant number of changes and major enhancements --
>please use it!
>
>Downloads are available from:
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update
Hi!
I tried to use sa-compile. sa-compile itself succeeded and body_0 rules are
built.
But after restarting spamd I get lots of message complaining about missing
body_400.pm up to body_1000.pm and same for body_neg400.pm to body_neg1000.pm.
eg.:
Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/bo
Anders Norrbring wrote:
>
> I just ran into a big problem..
>
> [25735] warn: bayes: database version is different than we understand
> (3), aborting! at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm
> line 136
>
>
> Any ideas please?
>
> Anders
What version did y
I had a problem with re2c v0.11.3 segfaulting when bogus-virus-warnings.cf
was in use (?). 0.12.0 runs ok.
A.
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Quoting Justin Mason:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5435
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1708378&group_id=96864&a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Not sure if it's entirely on-topic, but at least I want to monitor it
> closely.
>
> A while ago I implemented graylisting, which works quite well. But since
> 2 days ago I'm seeing loads of mails which are passing by the
> greylisting (so they are being se
> -Original Message-
> From: Abba Communications [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 11:20 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: notice diff between using 3.1.8 and 3.2.0 ?
>
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Is anyone noticing small, medium, or large improvement
Quoting Justin Mason:
>>> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5435
>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1708378&group_id=96864&atid=616200
>>> re2c 12.0 works for me.
>> re2c-0.11.1:Compile regular express
> yep, apparently 0.11.3 works -- see bug 5435.
A
Hi,
YN Verma wrote:
Hi
Can anyone tell me why this message is appearing
Insecure dependency in `` while running with -T switch at
/usr/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Sys/Hostname/Long.pm line 91, line 86.
Regards
I recently tracked this down on my systems. Sys::Hostname::Long tries
to work out
Max de Mendizábal wrote:
Hi Max, hi all!
Sorry for the thread hijacking...
I tested the rules with spamassassin --lint and everything is OK, but
stops scoring.
Perhaps you could provide your rulesdujour config?
which Version?
Maybe some old "prex" rules (RulesDuJour)?
Max de Mendizábal
Ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Jerry Durand wrote:
All DSL/dialup accounts get a 554 from us (using a couple of RBLs), so
I've actually seen our spam decrease lately.
I've used RBLs too, in the past. However, i've noticed legitimate
mailservers sometimes turn up in such lists
35 matches
Mail list logo
