Anton Melser wrote:
> Hi,
> I am writing a programme which needs to parse the summary (_SUMMARY_)
> returned by SA, and after combing the docs couldn't find relevant
> specs. It appears that the lines are a fixed length, but I couldn't be
> sure... is there anywhere I can get the specs so my parser
Andy Spiegl wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
When you're just using the BOTNET rule directly, not as a meta-rule, the
BOTNET_SOHO code is called internally, so it should automatically kick in
an exempt a host from BOTNET if it appears to be a soho type mail server.
I'm not sure I understand what you m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/25/07 11:15 PM, John Wilcock wrote:
> Andy Spiegl wrote:
>>
>> But the score for SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE is pretty high:
>> 1.723
>> How does that justify?
>
> No doubt it is "justified" by the fact that the corpora used to
> determine SpamAssassi
John Rudd wrote:
> When you're just using the BOTNET rule directly, not as a meta-rule, the
> BOTNET_SOHO code is called internally, so it should automatically kick in
> an exempt a host from BOTNET if it appears to be a soho type mail server.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "using as
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Anton Melser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
> I am writing a programme which needs to parse the summary (_SUMMARY_)
> returned by SA, and after combing the docs couldn't find relevant
> specs. It appears that the lines are a fixed length, but I couldn't be
Did the filters get me as spam, or are my questions to stupid to even
think about?
Cheers
Anton
ps. If there are docs out there that answer my questions, then please
stoop to providing a link or two...
Andy Spiegl wrote:
...I wonder how to deal with the cases where there is a legitimate
internal mailserver behind dialup-IPs. There are quite a few small
companies that have a small home office network behind a dialup DSL
and run an internal mailserver which relays external mail to the mailserver
It won't be SA doing the deleting. SA does nothing with email except
scan and add the headers (if so set).
What happens to the mail before and after is entirely down to your
mail prog. You can't bounce a message from SA, nor can you delete a
message from SA; all you can do is scan it and add some
Oenus Tech Services wrote:
> After much testing, we have decided to put the RBLs on Postfix for
> performance reasons. Before checking with those RBLs, our system does
> EHLO checks against a known-spammer blacklist database as well to filter
> the most obvious cases. Then we use zen.spamhaus.org,
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Eric Beaurivage wrote:
Dear SpamAssassin Users,
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) Exchange
SpamAssassin Sink (www.christopherlewis.com) 1.2.76
I'm using the above versions under Windows 2000 Server and as soon as
someone is sending us an e-mai
Eric Beaurivage wrote:
Dear SpamAssassin Users,
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) Exchange SpamAssassin
Sink (www.christopherlewis.com) 1.2.76
I'm using the above versions under Windows 2000 Server and as soon as someone
is sending us an e-mail with a name containing a c
Dear SpamAssassin Users,
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) Exchange SpamAssassin
Sink (www.christopherlewis.com) 1.2.76
I'm using the above versions under Windows 2000 Server and as soon as someone
is sending us an e-mail with a name containing a comma + a french accent in
Strange, I checked the log and there is no closing bracket in the message id.
Maybe this screwed with something in the SA/procmail process.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dbsanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 8:15 PM
>> To
...I wonder how to deal with the cases where there is a legitimate
internal mailserver behind dialup-IPs. There are quite a few small
companies that have a small home office network behind a dialup DSL
and run an internal mailserver which relays external mail to the mailserver
of their provider wh
FUN PROJECT:
Help Rob McEwen test his new anti-spam tools!
As many already know... I'm one of a **small** handful of organizations with
authority to blacklist and whitelist "at will" on SURBL and I've provided
much administrative assistance to SURBL for years, particularly in
preventing false pos
> spam/virus mail had been blocking before this). We stopped
> using bayesian at all since 1.-Many of our customers get
Ps, bayesian isn't just for manual training. Maybe set a high/low score in
auto learning, but it does help.
__
> -Original Message-
> From: dbsanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 8:15 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Mail Lost? How can this happen?
>
>
>
> Not sure this is an SA problem at all, but maybe you can give
> me a clue. I seem to be losi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although I have some negative-score rules, my ham mails never score
> too much below zero. I've set auto learning for ham to -12 to be sure
> spam never gets marked as ham and my bayes database doesn't get
> polluted- i think it's quite bad if ham mail would be au
> -Original Message-
> From: Oenus Tech Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:33 AM
> To: Luis Hernán Otegui
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RBL tests on MTA vs. RBL rules on SA
>
>
> After much testing, we have decided to put the RBLs on
After much testing, we have decided to put the RBLs on Postfix for
performance reasons. Before checking with those RBLs, our system does
EHLO checks against a known-spammer blacklist database as well to filter
the most obvious cases. Then we use zen.spamhaus.org,
safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net, and bl.spamco
Duncan Findlay writes:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> > thanks Duncan -- a great read, and looks promising!
>
> > Would it help btw if we came up with a spec for what a score-generation
> > tool needs to generate, in terms of score ranges and so on?
> > This wou
Hi all,
I'm using spamd/spamc software for mail scanning on my mail server... I'm
running spamassassin from (debian sarge 3.1 r1 dvd, it's I think spamassassin
3.0.3). My problem is that I have a mail "firewall" with 25 spamd proccesses
but when arriving this limit I have read that spamd queues
Hi,
Although I have some negative-score rules, my ham mails never score too
much below zero. I've set auto learning for ham to -12 to be sure spam
never gets marked as ham and my bayes database doesn't get polluted- i
think it's quite bad if ham mail would be autolearned as spam (i guess
much
23 matches
Mail list logo
