Steven W. Orr wrote:
> On Thursday, Apr 26th 2007 at 01:45 -0400, quoth Matt Kettler:
>
> =>ram wrote:
> =>> Are the spammers testing some new spamtool
> =>> I am getting mails with just a single word like "gushes" "using" etc
> =>>
> =>> what is this about now ?
> =>>
> =>Read the archives
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> thanks Duncan -- a great read, and looks promising!
> Would it help btw if we came up with a spec for what a score-generation
> tool needs to generate, in terms of score ranges and so on?
> This would also be useful for the future (I'
Not sure this is an SA problem at all, but maybe you can give me a clue.
I seem to be losing messages. They are received by my mail system:
Apr 26 10:28:45 heckle sendmail[9295]: [ID 801593 mail.info] l3QHShh9009295:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=78591, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=, delay=00:00:02,
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Bret Miller wrote:
I said:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbc.com
try:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.sbc.com
If that does work, it goes against what is documented. I haven't had any
problem with whitelist_f
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Bret Miller wrote:
> I said:
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbc.com
try:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.sbc.com
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> One of my users is supposed to get messages from this person, but they
> often get marked as spam. So I want to whitelist, and I can use
> whitelist_from, but I want to use whitelist_from_rcvd. BUT, it doesn't
> work for me.
>
> I said:
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbc.com
>
> Which I
One of my users is supposed to get messages from this person, but they
often get marked as spam. So I want to whitelist, and I can use
whitelist_from, but I want to use whitelist_from_rcvd. BUT, it doesn't
work for me.
I said:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbc.com
Which I think means that
On Thursday, Apr 26th 2007 at 01:45 -0400, quoth Matt Kettler:
=>ram wrote:
=>> Are the spammers testing some new spamtool
=>> I am getting mails with just a single word like "gushes" "using" etc
=>>
=>> what is this about now ?
=>>
=>Read the archives for more details, however the general
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> RDJ is supposed to download to the RulesDuJour directory. After it
> downloads
> the files there, it moves them from ${TMPDIR} to ${SA_DIR}. ${TMPDIR} is
> RDJ's
> working directory. You don't want SA reading it's rules from there. RDJ
> may
> have multiple copies of each
As many of you know, I do front end spam filtering and I block a lot of
spam. I have been feeding some of this blocked spam to others who can
use it to mine for information like IPs to block, virus infected hosts,
URIBL etc. I also have several feeds as to what kind of spam you want
and I add h
Hi Tim,
> Is there a good test for these?
I don't get many of them, probably because I block them at MTA via
zen.spamhaus.org. But the ones that do get through are caught nicely
by the BOTNET rules.
Chau,
Andy.
--
If it ain't broke, improve it.
Matt Kettler wrote:
You imply Comcast has sufficient technical know-how to manage a network.
For a while their own outbound mailserver wasn't even generating a HELO
or EHLO.
Is that what it was? I had been getting a lot of complaints that random
Comcast users couldn't email anyone one o
Duncan Findlay writes:
> Hi everybody,
>
> As you may already know, Steven Birk and I have been working on our
> 4th year undergraduate project in Math and Engineering at Queen's
> University.
>
> The goal of our project was to examine the use of logistic regression
> as a potential replacement
Matt Kettler wrote:
ram wrote:
Are the spammers testing some new spamtool
I am getting mails with just a single word like "gushes" "using" etc
what is this about now ?
Read the archives for more details, however the general consensus is
it's due to:
1) a mass run of short-email
14 matches
Mail list logo
