R Lists06 wrote:
>> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Separate.
>>
> *snip*
>
>> In general, for options that you can do many of on one line, you only
>> put the option name itself once, you don't repeat it.
>>
>
> Thanks
>
> What I was getting at is what if there are multiple sending hosts...
>
At 06:35 PM 4/9/2007, Kelly Jones wrote:
I have about 20 domains, and any email to any of these domains
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) forwards to a single mailbox.
I handle email for all these domains myself, but it's becoming a hassle:
% dictionary attacks mean I often get the same spam repeatedly
WHY
I have about 20 domains, and any email to any of these domains
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) forwards to a single mailbox.
I handle email for all these domains myself, but it's becoming a hassle:
% dictionary attacks mean I often get the same spam repeatedly
% I'm too scared to change my SMTP config (to
On one server I manage, I found Botnet to be a tremendous help in
tagging spam, but does produce some FPs, almost entirely because of
misconfigured DNS. After notifying several mail/network admins of
their fubar DNS, I got tired of trying to clean up the Internet and
throttled Botnet back to 4.5 p
> Matt Kettler wrote:
> Separate.
*snip*
> In general, for options that you can do many of on one line, you only
> put the option name itself once, you don't repeat it.
Thanks
What I was getting at is what if there are multiple sending hosts...
Obviously the thing that changed was the last para
R Lists06 wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> Can lines be combined in a situation like this...
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] hisdomain.com whitelist_from_rcvd
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] hisotherdomain.com
>
>
> does this work or should this be done?
>
No. If you run spamassassin --lint, it should gener
Greeting,
Can lines be combined in a situation like this...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] hisdomain.com whitelist_from_rcvd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hisotherdomain.com
does this work or should this be done?
can they be combined into one statement or should they be separate?
Any other tips e
I have my trusted network setup correctly - but botnet fires on so many
domains, domains which would normally like to trust.
Yes its entirely possible its not set up right...but i followed the
instructions as best i could.
Bill Landry wrote:
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote the following on 4/9/20
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote the following on 4/9/2007 4:37 PM -0800:
> Bill Landry wrote:
>> Peter Russell wrote the following on 4/9/2007 3:41 PM -0800:
>>> We dont use Botnet anymore, it fires on anything/everything and
>>> drives me nuts.
>>>
>> You must not have Botnet and/or your trusted_networks
Bill Landry wrote:
Peter Russell wrote the following on 4/9/2007 3:41 PM -0800:
We dont use Botnet anymore, it fires on anything/everything and
drives me nuts.
You must not have Botnet and/or your trusted_networks setup correctly
then.
Bill
I am running Postfix+Amavisd-new+SA 3.1.7 gateways
Hey everyone,
I've found various opinions on this when I search so thought I would ask
here and see what people say.
Currently I have a debian box with spamassassin being called by qmail on
incoming emails, emails are then forwarded back out to the external mail
servers.
I am wanting to
I don't believe we use spamd as we run spamassassin from within MailScanner.
Is there a similar fix for our MailScanner configuration?
Thanks
Kiwidesign
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Messages-receiving-High-Score-but-still-getting-through-tf3503348.html#a9911174
Sent f
Peter Russell wrote the following on 4/9/2007 3:41 PM -0800:
We dont use Botnet anymore, it fires on anything/everything and drives
me nuts.
You must not have Botnet and/or your trusted_networks setup correctly then.
Bill
We dont use Botnet anymore, it fires on anything/everything and drives
me nuts.
Content analysis details: (7.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
1.5 FH_RELAY_NODNS We could no
At 01:53 PM 4/9/2007, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Can anyone run any of these messages to see how your rules score them?
Mostly stock symbol spam. I've been improving our scoring with updates
today, but still not able to come up with any rules to cover these:
http://esmtp.webtent.net/mail1.txt
--- Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone run any of these messages to see how your rules score
> them?
> Mostly stock symbol spam. I've been improving our scoring with
> updates
> today, but still not able to come up with any rules to cover these:
>
> http://esmtp.webtent.n
Can anyone run any of these messages to see how your rules score them?
Mostly stock symbol spam. I've been improving our scoring with updates
today, but still not able to come up with any rules to cover these:
http://esmtp.webtent.net/mail1.txt
http://esmtp.webtent.net/mail2.txt
http://esmtp.webte
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Scott Lockwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:46 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > Nobody has an edition with the problem. The only edition is, he is
> > harder to help him in Spanish who English. If his English is as bad
> as
> > m
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:46 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> Nobody has an edition with the problem. The only edition is, he is
> harder to help him in Spanish who English. If his English is as bad as
> my Spanish, you can always use the fish of Babel de AltaVista. I used
> it to write this note
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Scott Lockwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:09 +0200, night duke wrote:
> > Quisiera dar las gracias a toda la gente de la lista.
> > Efectivamente puedo hablar en Ingles o en castellano pero hay ciertas
> > cosas que quizas se entien
I got an obvious spam a little while ago that got scored
"X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?" so I looked up the message in
the system log. Check out line 5 below (server killed by SIGTERM):
Apr 9 10:35:02 localhost spamd[8657]: spamd: result: Y 14 -
BAYES_99,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:09 +0200, night duke wrote:
> Quisiera dar las gracias a toda la gente de la lista.
> Efectivamente puedo hablar en Ingles o en castellano pero hay ciertas
> cosas que quizas se entienden mejor en el idioma que suelo usar todos
> los dias,el castellano o español.
>
> El
Dean Shaw wrote:
We recently installed Google Analytics on our site and would like to
incorporate the tracking on our HTML-based email campaigns. On our
first attempt Spam Assassin flagged our email as ‘porn’. The only
different factor was the inclusion of GA code in the HTML of the email.
Dean Shaw wrote:
We recently installed Google Analytics on our site and would like to
incorporate the tracking on our HTML-based email campaigns. On our
first attempt Spam Assassin flagged our email as ‘porn’. The only
different factor was the inclusion of GA code in the HTML of the email.
Quisiera dar las gracias a toda la gente de la lista.
Efectivamente puedo hablar en Ingles o en castellano pero hay ciertas cosas
que quizas se entienden mejor en el idioma que suelo usar todos los dias,el
castellano o español.
El principal problema que tengo con el spamassassin es que es
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
> Dean Shaw wrote:
> > We recently installed Google Analytics on our site and would like to
> > incorporate the tracking on our HTML-based email campaigns.
>
> Regardless of that issue, you do realise that putting Javascript
> into emails is
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 13:13 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:07:35PM -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > sa-update -D --updatedir /usr/local/share/spamassassin --channel
> > updates.spamassassin.org
>
> Do you have a reason to be using --updatedir? If not, stop it.
>
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:07:35PM -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> sa-update -D --updatedir /usr/local/share/spamassassin --channel
> updates.spamassassin.org
Do you have a reason to be using --updatedir? If not, stop it.
> Also, I ran sa-update alone and noticed on our FreeBSD system that i
I am getting reports a quite a few spam messages and found a lot when
looking in our archives. Trying to debug our SA 3.1.7 configuration, I
am finding the following when doing 'sa-update -D', we do seem to be
getting a lot of stock symbol spam getting through. If I clear out the
updates from the l
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:19:54AM -0700, hubby2debbie wrote:
> I've gone to etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre, as well as the v310.pre and
> v312.pre files in the same directory, and all three of them have the
> directive "loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat" (uncommented).
If the plugins
>
> *- it can be done under certain circumstances and reworking the standard
> config files a little bit, but unless you know what these are without my
> telling you, you should use a pre file. :)
>
I've gone to etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre, as well as the v310.pre and
v312.pre files in t
--- "Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "J." said:
> >Thanks Ram. Not sure how to implement recipient verification with
> my
> >setup, but I'll look into it. I have an SPF record for my domain
>
> I'm confused. Are you all saying that J's mail server was processing
> a
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:41:38AM -0700, hubby2debbie wrote:
> I'm running spamassassin on a linux vps, which had it already installed, but
> none of the plugins were installed. I've loaded the available plugins into
> the etc/spamassassin/Plugin/ directory, and enabled the TextCat plugin in
> the
I'm running spamassassin on a linux vps, which had it already installed, but
none of the plugins were installed. I've loaded the available plugins into
the etc/spamassassin/Plugin/ directory, and enabled the TextCat plugin in
the user_prefs file. I've also added a directive stating what languages
"J." said:
>Thanks Ram. Not sure how to implement recipient verification with my
>setup, but I'll look into it. I have an SPF record for my domain
I'm confused. Are you all saying that J's mail server was processing all
incoming e-mails, even if there wasn't an alias set up on that domain? in ot
We recently installed Google Analytics on our site and would like to
incorporate the tracking on our HTML-based email campaigns. On our first
attempt Spam Assassin flagged our email as 'porn'. The only different factor
was the inclusion of GA code in the HTML of the email.
Has anyone enc
On 9 Apr 2007, at 15:18, J. wrote:
--- ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) Verify recipient addresses
2) Add SPF records for your domain. And blacklist those servers who
accept forged mails from your domain and bounce them
3) If you are suddenly facing a flush of Mailer-"Demons" give a
TEMPFAIL
--- ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 11:14 -0700, J. wrote:
> > Not sure if this is connected to my agressive smtp connection
> rejection
> > campaign over the past week, but we've been hit for the first time
> in
> > many months with a backscatter spam attack. Spammer(s) us
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 11:14 -0700, J. wrote:
> Not sure if this is connected to my agressive smtp connection rejection
> campaign over the past week, but we've been hit for the first time in
> many months with a backscatter spam attack. Spammer(s) use random
> addresses with our domain for their sp
39 matches
Mail list logo
