One issue is that I have fast_spamassassin turned on so I don't get to
filter on specific rules that a mail hits. Do you use this and if so,
do you know if you have to filter based on the rule getting hit?
This is the Qmail thing that throws away the SA markup, isn't it?
I'm not running vbounce
J. wrote the following on 4/8/2007 4:11 PM -0800:
> --- Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Also, have you taken a look at the SA "vbounce" ruleset? See:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/VBounceRuleset
>>
>
> One issue is that I have fast_spamassassin turned on so I
--- Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, have you taken a look at the SA "vbounce" ruleset? See:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/VBounceRuleset
One issue is that I have fast_spamassassin turned on so I don't get to
filter on specific rules that a mail hits. Do you use thi
--- Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J. wrote the following on 4/8/2007 11:14 AM -0800:
> > Not sure if this is connected to my agressive smtp connection
> rejection
> > campaign over the past week, but we've been hit for the first time
> in
> > many months with a backscatter spam attack.
On Sunday 08 April 2007, John D. Hardin wrote:
>On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings;
>>
>> trigger phrases of the ip address, presented in the form of
>>
>> * ^X-Originating-IP: "from \[xxx\.xxx\.xxx\.xxx\]"
>>
>> don't seem to be working.
>>
>> Is my syntax for the use of the '\'
J. wrote:
> Not sure if this is connected to my agressive smtp connection rejection
> campaign over the past week, but we've been hit for the first time in
> many months with a backscatter spam attack. Spammer(s) use random
> addresses with our domain for their spamming so we get the flood
> (13000
J. wrote the following on 4/8/2007 11:14 AM -0800:
> Not sure if this is connected to my agressive smtp connection rejection
> campaign over the past week, but we've been hit for the first time in
> many months with a backscatter spam attack. Spammer(s) use random
> addresses with our domain for th
Not sure if this is connected to my agressive smtp connection rejection
campaign over the past week, but we've been hit for the first time in
many months with a backscatter spam attack. Spammer(s) use random
addresses with our domain for their spamming so we get the flood
(13000+ since midnight) of
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> trigger phrases of the ip address, presented in the form of
>
> * ^X-Originating-IP: "from \[xxx\.xxx\.xxx\.xxx\]"
>
> don't seem to be working.
>
> Is my syntax for the use of the '\' escape wrong?
No, but I question the quotes - are t
--- "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, J. wrote:
>
> > --- "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > You might want to look at this instead of trying to hand-roll
> > > obfuscation rules:
> > >
> > > http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/antispam/obfusc.pl
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Subject: Re: procmailrc question
Procmail questions are offtopic for the spamassassin list. You should
ask those in a procmail users forum. However I can't resist...
> trigger phrases of the ip address, presented in the form of
>
> * ^X-Originating-IP: "from \[xxx\.xxx\.x
Greetings;
trigger phrases of the ip address, presented in the form of
* ^X-Originating-IP: "from \[xxx\.xxx\.xxx\.xxx\]"
don't seem to be working.
Is my syntax for the use of the '\' escape wrong?
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, an
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, J. wrote:
> --- "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You might want to look at this instead of trying to hand-roll
> > obfuscation rules:
> >
> > http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/antispam/obfusc.pl
>
> Thanks John. I have no idea what the program does but it does
13 matches
Mail list logo
